Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/5/25 at 9:30 am to jangalang
Yes, Ole Miss is a football school. They love their football, have supported their team in years where the win/loss record sucked, and have contributed to the culture that is the SEC. I would say yes, they are a football school.
Posted on 2/5/25 at 9:35 am to John Milner
quote:
More than Auburn is
O my sweet baby. Let me hold you.
Posted on 2/5/25 at 9:35 am to pankReb
quote:
Billy Cannon
Stepped out of bounds....
And a felon!
Posted on 2/5/25 at 9:59 am to Landmass
1 poll out of many doesn't grant you a legit Natty bud.
Posted on 2/5/25 at 10:11 am to BigNastyTiger417
quote:
1 poll out of many doesn't grant you a legit Natty bud.
8-2 Minnesota is on your list over a 10-0 ole miss? Aight....
Go shite yourself with your buddy Joe, talk DEI and other liberal bs.
OM was fricked by liberal media, not even a debate. By acknowledging that, makes you part of the problem. Trump should ship your arse to Canada
Posted on 2/5/25 at 10:12 am to BigNastyTiger417
Apparently Oregon won the national championship this year as well.
Posted on 2/5/25 at 10:15 am to jangalang
quote:
Apparently Oregon won the national championship this year as well.
If Oregon is the 8-2 Minnesota team... Yes they did...
I bet you are a big ole liberal aren't you. You support they robbed the southern schools of titles for what the states political parties were doing.
Posted on 2/5/25 at 10:15 am to NWLA_Bama
quote:
Yes, Ole Miss is a football school. They love their football, have supported their team in years where the win/loss record sucked, and have contributed to the culture that is the SEC. I would say yes, they are a football school.
They have great SEC qualities. But their record against Auburn is 12-35. They dont deserve the distinction.
Posted on 2/5/25 at 10:18 am to Insurancerebel
quote:
I bet you are a big ole liberal aren't you. You support they robbed the southern schools of titles for what the states political parties were doing.
What could Mississippi's political parties be doing that Alabama wasn't doing in 1957 when Auburn was concensus? Goat sex?
Posted on 2/5/25 at 10:23 am to jangalang
Auburn is not a measuring stick of being a "football school".
Posted on 2/5/25 at 10:30 am to jangalang
quote:
What could Mississippi's political parties be doing that Alabama wasn't doing in 1957 when Auburn was concensus? Goat sex?
Well it couldn't be that consensus since Ohio State splits it with them! Knuckle head.
Besides Auburn was banned from post season that year for paying players! PFFFFF
This post was edited on 2/5/25 at 10:33 am
Posted on 2/5/25 at 10:32 am to jangalang
Stop, just stop with the tomfoolery. Not having a great record against Auburn doesn't negate all the other things their program has done in its history. Auburn isn't that important.
Posted on 2/5/25 at 10:34 am to Insurancerebel
I dont care that some laundromat named Ohio State National Champions in 1957.
All reputable sports polls named Auburn national championss
All reputable sports polls named Auburn national championss
Posted on 2/5/25 at 10:35 am to NWLA_Bama
quote:
Stop, just stop with the tomfoolery. Not having a great record against Auburn doesn't negate all the other things their program has done in its history.
What other things have they done that cannot be negated?
Posted on 2/5/25 at 10:36 am to jangalang
quote:
I dont care that some laundromat named Ohio State National Champions in 1957.
The coaches named Ohio state national champions.
"The national championship was split with Auburn No. 1 in the AP Poll and Ohio State, despite one loss, ranked No. 1 by the UPI coaches poll, Football Writers Association of America and International News Service."
Probably would have been "consensus" if politics were not part of it.
Posted on 2/5/25 at 10:41 am to Insurancerebel
Guess you should be mad at the AP and read a book.
Posted on 2/5/25 at 10:49 am to jangalang
quote:
Guess you should be mad at the AP and read a book.
I think Mississippi had a better case for #1 than Southern Cal did, which I'll go over in detail when I compare the 2 teams near the end of this article, but obviously the AP poll didn't even have 10-0 Mississippi #2. They had 8-1 Wisconsin rated higher despite a loss (Southern Cal gave them a 2nd loss in the Rose Bowl). Clearly Mississippi commanded very little respect, and there is a reason for that.
This is the 5th time in 6 years 1957-1962 that we have an SEC team vying for the MNC against a non-Southern team, and I've discussed this issue in previous MNC articles, but the big problem for the South at this time was segregation. This wasn't just because segregation caused poll voters to have a political bias against Southern teams, but also because segregation forced SEC MNC contenders to only play against other all-white teams, severely restricting the level of their competition. On top of that, they generally only played teams from their own region, and as such they were easy for the rest of the nation to forget about or ignore.
non ole miss guy explains south was screwed
This post was edited on 2/5/25 at 10:51 am
Posted on 2/5/25 at 10:54 am to Insurancerebel
The AP, Billingsley, Sagarin, and a handful of other outfits named Auburn national champions despite having a postseason ban. Sounds like we werent screwed at all.
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News