Started By
Message
re: Is Missouri better than they were given credit for or is LSU really that bad?
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:31 am to JesusQuintana
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:31 am to JesusQuintana
quote:He was in so early that he was pretty much the starter.
I’d like to get to play the Tennessee game again with Bazelak playing the entire time.
1
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:31 am to TRUERockyTop
Some of both. Bazelak should've been the starter from the beginning, he could be the next Drew Lock
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:31 am to rich4pres
quote:
You lost by 23. Cmon man.
Right. Id love to play that game again. Would be so much closer the 2nd time around.
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:32 am to rich4pres
Yeah, we did. We also wasted 3 possessions to start the game playing Robinson and when Bazelak came in we dropped two perfect passes that would have went for TDs
It is what it is
It is what it is
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:32 am to mizslu314
quote:
Right. Id love to play that game again. Would be so much closer the 2nd time around.
Yeah, maybe under three touchdowns. Maybe
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:33 am to JesusQuintana
quote:
Yeah, we did. We also wasted 3 possessions to start the game playing Robinson
You lost by four possessions.
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:36 am to Prof
quote:
He was in so early that he was pretty much the starter.
Robinson played the first 3 series and we scored zero points. I’m not even sure we got a first down.
When Bazelak came in we were moving down the field on every drive.
You guys won the game, not trying to take that away. Just saying it could have been much different with the right QB and if our receivers didn’t have the most drops in program history for a game
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:36 am to rich4pres
Mizzou had 5 drops that were easy catches, 0 against LSU using a bunch of new WR's. Ballsack starting wasn't the only change, there were several changes made between Tennessee and LSU that caused for instant improvement.
Im in no way saying we beat UT, but Id feel very confident is saying we would lose by less than 10
Im in no way saying we beat UT, but Id feel very confident is saying we would lose by less than 10
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:37 am to rich4pres
Tennessee would have still won the game, our defense could not stop the run.
But, our offense was so bad to start that game. By the time Drink made the QB switch it was already 14-0.
But, our offense was so bad to start that game. By the time Drink made the QB switch it was already 14-0.
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:38 am to kczoutiger
quote:
our defense could not stop the run.
Jeffcoat taking Turners place was a step in the right direction
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:39 am to TRUERockyTop
LSU is THAT bad
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:41 am to mizslu314
quote:
You lost by 23. Cmon man.
quote:
Right. Id love to play that game again. Would be so much closer the 2nd time around.
So, if they played again (in your scenario)...would UT be playing their Senior DB (Shamburger), or the True Freshman that started against Mizzou the first time because of contact tracing?
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:43 am to TRUERockyTop
LSU is that bad
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:43 am to TRUERockyTop
Missouri is pretty good on offense, but overall they are not very good. The number of fumbles they gave LSU should have cost them that game. LSU is abad football team.
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:44 am to Gings5
I imagine we'll have a better record at the end of the season than Tennessee. So we have that going for us.
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:46 am to mizslu314
quote:
Mizzou had 5 drops that were easy catches, 0 against LSU using a bunch of new WR's. Ballsack starting wasn't the only change, there were several changes made between Tennessee and LSU that caused for instant improvement.
Im in no way saying we beat UT, but Id feel very confident is saying we would lose by less than 10
Remember, UT was down 2 defensive starters due to contact tracing.
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:48 am to TRUERockyTop
It took 3 weeks to get to 1-2 beating a 1-2 team. Not saying LSU is bad, but Mizzou hasn't been tested. Also, their schedule is shite where they could win out. Oh boy, you played Alabama. We do that every year and even the last 2 Arkansas has put up points, on BETTER Alabama teams.
This post was edited on 10/12/20 at 11:49 am
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:49 am to madmaxvol
No one is taking away the fact that Tennessee would have won. The difference is that we spotted you 14 points before the QB change. We didn't have a pulse and our defense was gassed for being on the field for so long. It really should have been 17 nothing with the missed FG. We lost that game because we could not line up properly, tackle, and stop the run and would have regardless. The difference is we would have been in it a little longer than what it ended up being.
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:50 am to TRUERockyTop
We are really that bad
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:51 am to JesusQuintana
quote:
I would not be at all surprised if they beat Florida this weekend
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News