Started By
Message

re: Is it reasonable to expect Tennessee football to turn around?

Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:50 am to
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28553 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:50 am to
quote:



And then exclude what he refers to as Tennessee's best era


Who came blame him, we all know SoG is Vol in disguise and his whole plan was to build up creditably as a Bama fan than turn on all of us when we wouldn't see it coming in an off-season thread.
Posted by Huddie Leadbetter
Member since May 2016
3822 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:50 am to
quote:

SummerOfGeorge


You have a link to where I said 25 years is too small a sample size?
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105802 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:51 am to
quote:

He is ignoring the short term of 10 years, which is often used in measuring statistics


Often used by who? Why don't we do the last 5? How about the last 20?

It seems to me you are TRYING to ignore the 1990s. That's not a haphazard sample brother.

quote:

he's ignoring the more important longer term of the 47 years since integration of SEC teams.


I literally posted the stats earlier and you responded by talking about SEC Winning % and basically ignoring all the other stats.
Posted by David Ricky
Hailing From Parts Unknown
Member since Sep 2015
25906 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Can we all just agree that UT is missing the coach that can take them to the promise land. Facilities are top notch, fan base is huge but they need a legendary coach and an improved athletic department (which may be the case now).



I completely agree.
Posted by Huddie Leadbetter
Member since May 2016
3822 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Those hillbillies were decent when every team was playing white boys.



what's the problem then?


The obvious problem for UT is that those days are long the hell gone.
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105802 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:52 am to
quote:

You have a link to where I said 25 years is too small a sample size?


You kidding me?



In response to using since 1992

quote:

It's not indicative of real trends to look at a small sample


Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28553 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:52 am to
quote:



You don't even get the point, do you?


No, no one understands your point

I guess it is just all of us that are wrong because we are secret Vol homers
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
70096 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:52 am to
He's saying Tennessee's crackers >>> Other people's Crackers
Posted by BigOrangeBri
Nashville- 4th & 19
Member since Jul 2012
12836 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:53 am to
Then why not just pick the year in which the SEC began? That is a very important line of demarcation for the conference. You know, since it's when it began. But again, that wouldn't support your narrative
Posted by craigbiggio
Member since Dec 2009
31805 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:53 am to
I'm going to disregard Bama's run since 2008 since their blacks are better than everyone else's blacks
Posted by David Ricky
Hailing From Parts Unknown
Member since Sep 2015
25906 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:54 am to
Posted by Huddie Leadbetter
Member since May 2016
3822 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:55 am to
quote:

You have a link to where I said 25 years is too small a sample size?



You kidding me?



In response to using since 1992

quote:
It's not indicative of real trends to look at a small sample


Which obviously isn't the same as "25 years is too small a sample size"

I'm still waiting for that one.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
70096 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:55 am to
quote:

I'm going to disregard Bama's run since 2008 since their blacks are better than everyone else's blacks




Yep, their blacks are superior. Serious blacks at Bama.
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105802 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:56 am to
quote:

I'm going to disregard Bama's run since 2008 since their blacks are better than everyone else's blacks


How dare you racist







Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
70096 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:56 am to
quote:

In response to using since 1992

quote:
It's not indicative of real trends to look at a small sample


Which obviously isn't the same as "25 years is too small a sample size"



Umm, yes it is
Posted by Huddie Leadbetter
Member since May 2016
3822 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Then why not just pick the year in which the SEC began? That is a very important line of demarcation for the conference. You know, since it's when it began. But again, that wouldn't support your narrative


Oh, but I also didn't say that UT has never been one of the best SEC teams. I said they haven't been since the SEC teams integrated.

Some of you keep trying to spin my comments, but you miserably fail at it.
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105802 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Which obviously isn't the same as "25 years is too small a sample size"


I'm sorry, so "its not indicative of real trends" is not the same as "bad sample"?

So a period of time that makes up 25% of the entirety of something's history isn't enough to see some trends? Alright.
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28553 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:57 am to
quote:


Which obviously isn't the same as "25 years is too small a sample size"

I'm still waiting for that one.


You have to be trolling at this point
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105802 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:58 am to
quote:

UT has never been one of the best SEC teams


quote:

I said they haven't been since the SEC teams integrated.



I mean, that's just stupid Huddie. They were the 2nd best team in the SEC in the 1990s, won 2 SEC Titles and 1 National Title.

I hate them too (and really fvckin hated them too, living every second of every day as the lone Bammer in a sea of Orange), but that's just not being rational.
Posted by Huddie Leadbetter
Member since May 2016
3822 posts
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:59 am to
quote:

In response to using since 1992

quote:
It's not indicative of real trends to look at a small sample


Which obviously isn't the same as "25 years is too small a sample size"




Umm, yes it is


If you're too ignorant to understand the difference, let alone that it isn't the same comment, then it's pointless to try to explain it to you.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter