Started By
Message
re: Is it reasonable to expect Tennessee football to turn around?
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:50 am to craigbiggio
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:50 am to craigbiggio
quote:
And then exclude what he refers to as Tennessee's best era
Who came blame him, we all know SoG is Vol in disguise and his whole plan was to build up creditably as a Bama fan than turn on all of us when we wouldn't see it coming in an off-season thread.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:50 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
SummerOfGeorge
You have a link to where I said 25 years is too small a sample size?
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:51 am to Huddie Leadbetter
quote:
He is ignoring the short term of 10 years, which is often used in measuring statistics
Often used by who? Why don't we do the last 5? How about the last 20?
It seems to me you are TRYING to ignore the 1990s. That's not a haphazard sample brother.
quote:
he's ignoring the more important longer term of the 47 years since integration of SEC teams.
I literally posted the stats earlier and you responded by talking about SEC Winning % and basically ignoring all the other stats.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:51 am to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
Can we all just agree that UT is missing the coach that can take them to the promise land. Facilities are top notch, fan base is huge but they need a legendary coach and an improved athletic department (which may be the case now).
I completely agree.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:51 am to craigbiggio
quote:
Those hillbillies were decent when every team was playing white boys.
what's the problem then?
The obvious problem for UT is that those days are long the hell gone.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:52 am to Huddie Leadbetter
quote:
You have a link to where I said 25 years is too small a sample size?
You kidding me?
In response to using since 1992
quote:
It's not indicative of real trends to look at a small sample
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:52 am to Huddie Leadbetter
quote:
You don't even get the point, do you?
No, no one understands your point
I guess it is just all of us that are wrong because we are secret Vol homers
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:52 am to craigbiggio
He's saying Tennessee's crackers >>> Other people's Crackers
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:53 am to Huddie Leadbetter
Then why not just pick the year in which the SEC began? That is a very important line of demarcation for the conference. You know, since it's when it began. But again, that wouldn't support your narrative
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:53 am to Vols&Shaft83
I'm going to disregard Bama's run since 2008 since their blacks are better than everyone else's blacks
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:55 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
You have a link to where I said 25 years is too small a sample size?
You kidding me?
In response to using since 1992
quote:
It's not indicative of real trends to look at a small sample
Which obviously isn't the same as "25 years is too small a sample size"
I'm still waiting for that one.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:55 am to craigbiggio
quote:
I'm going to disregard Bama's run since 2008 since their blacks are better than everyone else's blacks
Yep, their blacks are superior. Serious blacks at Bama.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:56 am to craigbiggio
quote:
I'm going to disregard Bama's run since 2008 since their blacks are better than everyone else's blacks
How dare you racist

Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:56 am to Huddie Leadbetter
quote:
In response to using since 1992
quote:
It's not indicative of real trends to look at a small sample
Which obviously isn't the same as "25 years is too small a sample size"
Umm, yes it is
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:57 am to BigOrangeBri
quote:
Then why not just pick the year in which the SEC began? That is a very important line of demarcation for the conference. You know, since it's when it began. But again, that wouldn't support your narrative
Oh, but I also didn't say that UT has never been one of the best SEC teams. I said they haven't been since the SEC teams integrated.
Some of you keep trying to spin my comments, but you miserably fail at it.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:57 am to Huddie Leadbetter
quote:
Which obviously isn't the same as "25 years is too small a sample size"
I'm sorry, so "its not indicative of real trends" is not the same as "bad sample"?
So a period of time that makes up 25% of the entirety of something's history isn't enough to see some trends? Alright.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:57 am to Huddie Leadbetter
quote:
Which obviously isn't the same as "25 years is too small a sample size"
I'm still waiting for that one.
You have to be trolling at this point
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:58 am to Huddie Leadbetter
quote:
UT has never been one of the best SEC teams
quote:
I said they haven't been since the SEC teams integrated.
I mean, that's just stupid Huddie. They were the 2nd best team in the SEC in the 1990s, won 2 SEC Titles and 1 National Title.
I hate them too (and really fvckin hated them too, living every second of every day as the lone Bammer in a sea of Orange), but that's just not being rational.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:59 am to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
In response to using since 1992
quote:
It's not indicative of real trends to look at a small sample
Which obviously isn't the same as "25 years is too small a sample size"
Umm, yes it is
If you're too ignorant to understand the difference, let alone that it isn't the same comment, then it's pointless to try to explain it to you.
Popular
Back to top


0





