Started By
Message

re: Is an ejection from the game enough for Wade?

Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:29 am to
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57004 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:29 am to
quote:

Only a dumbass punt returner who doesn't fully understand his job gets cracked on that play.


Yes, you have gone full retard with that statement right there.

ETA: 200

This post was edited on 10/31/11 at 9:30 am
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:33 am to
I would suspend him for the next game not for the hit but for his behavior afterwards with his coaches.
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
29386 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:34 am to
quote:

I would suspend him for the next game not for the hit but for his behavior afterwards with his coaches.


I'm sure Petrino will take your opinion under advisement.
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25421 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:38 am to
quote:


I posted in the original thread and got called and idiot and a dumbass by about 20 people because i stated the following:
1. no fair catch was called. If Vandy teaches their return guys to call fair catches by A) Shielding their eyes from the sun or B) extending their arm horizontally in order to keep balance while running, the spec teams coach should be fired. I somehow doubt they do either of the above.
2. i saw no celebration. the announcers spoke of celebration but after watching it 20 times, i have yet to see any celebration. IF YOU HAVE VIDEO/PICS OF SAID CELEBRATION, PLEASE POST IT. I saw him get up all excited-like. When you boom someone (especially not yet knowing there was a penalty on the said hit) you will get up very excitedly.
3. the play wasn't ejection-worthy. i guess 80% of the SECrant posters have been on punt coverage teams. They must all know how easy it is to time a hit on a punt returner without being able to see the ball.
4. Horrible play by the return man. If he does the same thing on the same play against any other team, he will get BOOMED again.
5. Yes, there was an obvious kick-catch interference. Yes, he initiated helmet-to-helmet contact (such as Jarvis Landry did on Tre Mason). It is hard not to lower your head and brace for the impact you know is coming.
6. Also, if Wade doesnt boom that guy, the other arky player right next to him would have. Cause thats how you play football... Pussies.


true story
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25421 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:40 am to
quote:

I would suspend him for the next game not for the hit but for his behavior afterwards with his coaches.


yeah...he was clearly upset about the ejection because he didn't know what he really did. He kept saying..."I didn't know coach"
Posted by GonzoLeslie
Alabama
Member since Sep 2011
3695 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:42 am to
Again, I've been accused of going "full retard" three times, each without one single bit of factual substance or logical reasoning.

Tell me how im wrong or what im missing.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54691 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Only difference b/w this play and Wade's was that the punt returner clearly called for a fair catch here.

And the fact that he launched himself into the players head instead of his chest and then acted like a jack arse after the play. It was a cheap shot and it was to the guy's head. It is an extremely dangerous and completely unnecessary play and he should have been kicked out of the game.
This post was edited on 10/31/11 at 9:44 am
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
29386 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:45 am to
quote:

And the fact that he launched himself into the players head instead of his chest and then acted like a jack arse after the play. It was a cheap shot and it was to the guy's head. It is an extremely dangerous and completely unnecessary play and he should have been kicked out of the game.


Stick to worrying about AU players committing armed robberies. Petrino will take care of Wade.
Posted by Raz4back
Member since Mar 2011
3988 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:46 am to
First off the penalty was 100% correct. I'm not sure about the ejection, I'd be fine either way. What I don't get is the "defenseless player" bs. If the ball would have arrived just prior to the hit the returner would have been just as "defenseless" yet no penalty would have been called (perhaps helmet to helmet, although as LSU fans say about the Johnson hit, it looked like he made first contact with his shoulder), in fact, any fan base would celebrate that as a great play if a gunner crushed a return man as soon as a caught the ball.

I've returned punts, and I can assure you that you are defenseless until you have full possession of the ball and have time to make some sort of move. If you want to truly protect a "defenseless" return man then bring back the halo rule. Otherwise these kind of plays will occasionally happen.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57004 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:46 am to
quote:

Tell me how im wrong or what im missing.


Your statement

quote:

Only a dumbass punt returner who doesn't fully understand his job gets cracked on that play.


Do you not understand the concept of a punt return. He(the return man) is allowed to catch the ball, with either a fair catch( which he waived with his left hand) or no fair catch signal being waived. So why is he a "dumbass" for getting cracked prior to being able to catch the ball.


Apparently you don't fully understand the rules
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96490 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:47 am to
do people really think he should be kicked off that team? that is pretty harsh imo.
Posted by GonzoLeslie
Alabama
Member since Sep 2011
3695 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:47 am to


defenseless player. should have been ejected.
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96490 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:49 am to
quote:

I would suspend him for the next game not for the hit but for his behavior afterwards with his coaches. yeah...he was clearly upset about the ejection because he didn't know what he really did. He kept saying..."I didn't know coach"


he didnt know what? that you can lay out of a punt returner a full second before the ball gets there? or he didnt know the punt returner didnt have the ball?
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96490 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:49 am to
you should quit posting in this thread.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57004 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:50 am to
quote:

defenseless player. should have been ejected.


Oh, so he didn't have the ball in his possession? You need to go back to whatever hole you came out of.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54691 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:50 am to
quote:

1. no fair catch was called.
True, but mostly irrelevant.

quote:

2. i saw no celebration. the announcers spoke of celebration but after watching it 20 times, i have yet to see any celebration. IF YOU HAVE VIDEO/PICS OF SAID CELEBRATION, PLEASE POST IT.
I've seen video of him hoping up and down, but the cameras didn't really stay on him, so no one that wasn't there can say for sure. However, I just don't see announcers making that up. Also, his behavior on the sideline wasn't exactly commendable or classy.
quote:

3. the play wasn't ejection-worthy.
He made an unnecessary, malicious and gratuitous hit to the head of defenseless player at full speed. Definitely ejection worthy. Kick off the team worthy, etc.-definitely not. It was just one dumbass play.
quote:

4. Horrible play by the return man.
Debatable, but ultimately irrelevant. The rules allow for him to have the opportunity to catch the kick without someone taking his head off befoer it happens. Had the hit occurred post catch, you would have a point.
quote:

Yes, there was an obvious kick-catch interference.
Exactly.
quote:

Yes, he initiated helmet-to-helmet contact
Exactly.
quote:

(such as Jarvis Landry did on Tre Mason).
Except that Tre Mason had the ball and wasn't in a defenseless position. That is what is most egregious about it; going to a guys head that is in a defenseless position.
This post was edited on 10/31/11 at 9:59 am
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
29386 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:51 am to
Gonzo, you're right. Don't let these fools mess with you. They have nothing else to talk about because their football teams suck this year.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57004 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:51 am to
quote:

do people really think he should be kicked off that team? that is pretty harsh imo.


I don't think so. But some sort of minor suspension, sure. a half game, maybe full game tops
Posted by Eternalmajin
Member since Jun 2008
13506 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:52 am to
quote:

6. Also, if Wade doesnt boom that guy, the other arky player right next to him would have. Cause thats how you play football... Pussies.


Funny, all the other Arky players around him were pulling up or veering out of the way.
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96490 posts
Posted on 10/31/11 at 9:52 am to
quote:

They have nothing else to talk about because their football teams suck this year.


who is they?
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter