Started By
Message
re: Is Alabama really a dynasty??
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:44 pm to EvilVodka
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:44 pm to EvilVodka
Don't worry it's just a bad nightmare, it's 2005, you're asleep in your bed, Nick Saban is still at LSU, Mike Shula is still at Alabama, nothing to fear.
This post was edited on 5/14/13 at 3:45 pm
0
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:45 pm to EvilVodka
3/4 titles and 61 wins over the last 5 years in the toughest conference in the country = dynasty
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:47 pm to townhallsavoy
quote:
The first page was full of 3 out of 4 talk but don't forget that they went undefeated in the regular season in 2008 and then in 2010 won 10 games and damn near won the three they lost.
Yes, it's a dynasty, and unless someone in the SEC steps it up, we're looking at potentially the most dominant dynasty in history.
But in 2008, there was a better team....Florida. And then they lost to UTAH in the Sugar Bowl...
Also, no one has addressed the 2 SEC Championships....as many as Tennessee in the late 90s
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:47 pm to EvilVodka
quote:
something that shows they are a little more than a mini-dynasty...
like?????
quote:
IMO, a real DYNASTY dominates over a long period of time...
oh, okay, here it is, a certain time frame. So how long of a time frame?
quote:
So back to the question, I want to see more dominance from Alabama, especially in conference, as far as conference championships.
quote:
Alabama has had a good run, but they certainly haven't dominated
not sure if serious
quote:
then what do you call FSU '87-'00, Miami '83-'94, and Nebraska '92-'01?? Because they've done a hell of a lot more than Alabama's run of the last 4 years...do we need a new term? lol
what have they done in comparison?
again if you are going to make a claim, you might support it, because as of now all I see is your fingers in year ears and screaming. sorry
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:47 pm to USMC Gators
quote:
3/4 titles and 61 wins over the last 5 years in the toughest conference in the country = dynasty
Now way bud. You heard the LSU fan.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:48 pm to 12
NO One Cares outside of the State of Alabama and the states that surrounds it! Stupid Topic 
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:48 pm to EvilVodka
quote:Do you realized you just fricked yourself?
IMO, you should be able to look at their conference championships and spot the dynasty...like FSU in the ACC: FSU in the ACC - Championships
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:49 pm to EvilVodka
quote:
Also, no one has addressed the 2 SEC Championships....as many as Tennessee in the late 90s
Since '09
Bama - 2 SEC titles.
Eveyone else - 1 or fewer
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:49 pm to RT1941
quote:
Do you realized you just fricked yourself?
Maybe he doesn't realize that the ACC was absolute dogshit back then?
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:49 pm to DuckDoc
Lol thanks for the input, hippie
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:50 pm to Patton
You gotta love that even Auburn and UT fans are telling OP he is retarded
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:51 pm to NYCAuburn
You know you are on the wrong side of an argument about Bama when the Auburn fans disagree with you.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:51 pm to genro
Maybe people just like looking dumb on the Internet in front of strangers
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:52 pm to BigD Ag
quote:
TAMU, Sumlin, JFF were not impressed.
lol
Well, we know Alabama fans think they're a dynasty...
I'll consider Alabama a dynasty when they begin to dominate the SEC, similar to Oklahoma in the Big XII over the last decade....that's what I want to see. IMO, the dominance isn't there....
Oklahoma in Big XII Championships
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:53 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
then what do you call FSU '87-'00, Miami '83-'94, and Nebraska '92-'01?? Because they've done a hell of a lot more than Alabama's run of the last 4 years...do we need a new term? lol
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
what have they done in comparison?
I think LSU fan is trying to say those schools took a decade to win as many titles as Alabama, and therefore they did it over a longer period so it's better. Or something, I don't really know. I think he thought he'd have more support in this thread, but he's all alone and grasping at straws.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:53 pm to EvilVodka
Is anyone else gonna come and back you up?
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:54 pm to EvilVodka
So a bunch of conference championships and one national title is > than two conference championships in the toughest league, and three national titles in four years?
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:54 pm to EvilVodka
quote:Just fricked yourself again dude.
I'll consider Alabama a dynasty when they begin to dominate the SEC, similar to Oklahoma in the Big XII over the last decade....that's what I want to see. IMO, the dominance isn't there....
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:55 pm to EvilVodka
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:56 pm to bigpapamac
quote:And sighting the ACC/FSU & BigXII/Oklahoma for comparison's sake. Retarded
I think he thought he'd have more support in this thread, but he's all alone and grasping at straws.
This post was edited on 5/14/13 at 3:58 pm
Page 4 of 34
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News