Started By
Message
Posted on 5/15/13 at 3:18 pm to cyde
quote:
You, on the other hand, have done practically nothing but troll and incite. I believe a post quality review is in order.
Typical Ohio fan
Posted on 5/15/13 at 3:19 pm to Sheetbend
If we were to claim that, this dipshit would be posting these links to prove that the National media doesn't agree that it was a fluke...I'm confused.
Posted on 5/15/13 at 3:20 pm to EvilVodka
quote:
So a team can go undefeated, win the SEC, and not make the championship game one year, but in a different year, not even win the SEC and still make it?
The SEC in 2011 wasn't the same SEC as it was in 2004.
Posted on 5/15/13 at 3:25 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
Typical Ohio fan
If any school has more of a strange obsession with their coaches than bama, it is state.
Sheetbend keeps talking about the SEC/bama schedule, just waiting to hear justifacation of the big 10/osu
This post was edited on 5/15/13 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 5/15/13 at 3:29 pm to EvilVodka
OP is surely a flame.
Alabama is definitely a dynasty. Even with 3 the outlook going forward is still very good.
Alabama is definitely a dynasty. Even with 3 the outlook going forward is still very good.
Posted on 5/15/13 at 3:30 pm to EvilVodka
1. Three championships in four years
Not only is Alabama the only program to pull this off during the Bowl Championship Series era, but the Crimson Tide is college football’s first back-to-back consensus national champion since Nebraska in 1994-95. Outside of the Cornhuskers, who can claim a controversial split championship in 1997, you have to go all the way back to Notre Dame in the late 1940s to find a comparison.
2. Championship dominance
During those four seasons, Alabama played in six postseason games, four bowls and two Southeastern Conference championships. Three of the opponents were ranked No. 1, while the others were No. 2, No. 3 and No. 9, and coming in they had a combined record of 72-2. Alabama outscored them 213-82, for an average outcome of 35.5-12.5.
At one point during its three BCS title games, the Crimson Tide scored 79 unanswered points over seven-plus championship quarters, stemming from the fourth quarter against Texas and concluding during the second half of Alabama’s 42-14 dismantling of the Fighting Irish.
3. The Crimson Tide’s 61 victories since the start of the 2008 season are the most in a five-year span in SEC history and tied Nebraska (1993-1997) for the most in major college football. By beating Auburn on Nov. 24, 2012, Alabama passed the SEC record (58) established by the Florida teams of 2005-09.
Not only is Alabama the only program to pull this off during the Bowl Championship Series era, but the Crimson Tide is college football’s first back-to-back consensus national champion since Nebraska in 1994-95. Outside of the Cornhuskers, who can claim a controversial split championship in 1997, you have to go all the way back to Notre Dame in the late 1940s to find a comparison.
2. Championship dominance
During those four seasons, Alabama played in six postseason games, four bowls and two Southeastern Conference championships. Three of the opponents were ranked No. 1, while the others were No. 2, No. 3 and No. 9, and coming in they had a combined record of 72-2. Alabama outscored them 213-82, for an average outcome of 35.5-12.5.
At one point during its three BCS title games, the Crimson Tide scored 79 unanswered points over seven-plus championship quarters, stemming from the fourth quarter against Texas and concluding during the second half of Alabama’s 42-14 dismantling of the Fighting Irish.
3. The Crimson Tide’s 61 victories since the start of the 2008 season are the most in a five-year span in SEC history and tied Nebraska (1993-1997) for the most in major college football. By beating Auburn on Nov. 24, 2012, Alabama passed the SEC record (58) established by the Florida teams of 2005-09.
Posted on 5/15/13 at 3:30 pm to Ole Colonel 27
quote:
OP is surely a flame.
So is nearly every post in this thread.
Posted on 5/15/13 at 3:32 pm to pvilleguru
Big Daddy has it figured out now after 28 pages.
He says BCS and pre-BCS NC'S aren't good enough criteria for BAMA to claim championships, but other teams Dynasties can use both to claim theirs.
Then he says 3/4 isn't good enough because of 2/4 conference championships isn't enough. So basically because BAMA didn't win the SECC in 2011 we aren't a Dynasty, which = butthurt that BAMA got to rematch and win the NC.
He says BCS and pre-BCS NC'S aren't good enough criteria for BAMA to claim championships, but other teams Dynasties can use both to claim theirs.
Then he says 3/4 isn't good enough because of 2/4 conference championships isn't enough. So basically because BAMA didn't win the SECC in 2011 we aren't a Dynasty, which = butthurt that BAMA got to rematch and win the NC.
Posted on 5/15/13 at 3:35 pm to BIG DADDY 73
quote:
Big Daddy has it figured out now after 28 pages.
He says BCS and pre-BCS NC'S aren't good enough criteria for BAMA to claim championships, but other teams Dynasties can use both to claim theirs.
Then he says 3/4 isn't good enough because of 2/4 conference championships isn't enough. So basically because BAMA didn't win the SECC in 2011 we aren't a Dynasty, which = butthurt that BAMA got to rematch and win the NC.
Well, yeah. The fact that more than 85% of the people who have championed the OP's cause have been LSU fans supports this theory.
This post was edited on 5/15/13 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 5/15/13 at 3:36 pm to Ole Colonel 27
I think nothing...
Yet
Yet
This post was edited on 5/15/13 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 5/15/13 at 3:38 pm to Ole Colonel 27
Raise your e-cred
This post was edited on 5/15/13 at 3:38 pm
Posted on 5/15/13 at 3:42 pm to cyde
quote:
You, on the other hand, have done practically nothing but troll and incite. I believe a post quality review is in order.
Please don't run home whining to daddy. I am sorry if I hurt your feelings.
Wait! Where did I put that real dynasty button?
Posted on 5/15/13 at 3:42 pm to mwlewis
Im all bout some Rant cred. It make playas not want to frick wit me an my crew 
Posted on 5/15/13 at 3:43 pm to EvilVodka
Alabama is in a dynasty but it is not as dominant as the Us, Nebraska, or Florida states
Popular
Back to top


0







