Started By
Message
re: Iron Bowl Discussion
Posted on 11/14/17 at 6:02 pm to AeroSpaceTiger
Posted on 11/14/17 at 6:02 pm to AeroSpaceTiger
quote:
Oh ok. So you think because we have two losses we'll lose
No, please don't try to overthink or make great leaps. I think you have two losses because you suck. Not rocket science for an astronaut is it?
2
Posted on 11/14/17 at 6:06 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
The refs. They usually have a say-so in this game.
No, they really don't.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 6:06 pm to borotiger
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:11 pm to borotiger
quote:Only in LSU's games.
quote:
The refs. They usually have a say-so in this game.
No, they really don't.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:17 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
4. The refs. They usually have a say-so in this game.
Only when you need a second back on the clock
Posted on 11/14/17 at 8:10 pm to LanierSpots
I felt 65-70% against uga. They just didn't match up well with us.
I would have said 40% pre-injured bama.
I will go with 50% maybe even 55% now.
Every Auburn fan is worried about Hurts legs and Riddley's ability to win the 50/50 balls. A DTQB will make it more difficult for the LB's and Safties to contain the run like we did against uga...you have to hesitate and respect his running ability.
I would have said 40% pre-injured bama.
I will go with 50% maybe even 55% now.
Every Auburn fan is worried about Hurts legs and Riddley's ability to win the 50/50 balls. A DTQB will make it more difficult for the LB's and Safties to contain the run like we did against uga...you have to hesitate and respect his running ability.
This post was edited on 11/14/17 at 8:11 pm
Posted on 11/14/17 at 8:14 pm to coachcrisp
Auburn better win; LSU fans' self-worth depends on it.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 9:04 pm to AeroSpaceTiger
I didn't watch the AU vs MSU game, but assumed they steamrolled the Bulldogs given the score until I saw some of the below comparison on another board.
MSU:
Vs AU = gained 351 total yds (194 yd rushing on 47 attempts)
Vs UA = gained 330 total yds on offense against Alabama (172 yds rushing on 49 attempts)
Vs AU = allowed 511 yds (267 pass/244 rush - with a 60+ yarder run late), 14 first downs
Vs UA = allowed 444 yds (242 pass/202 rush), 19 first downs
For any that watched both, what was key difference that led to such a different outcome? Field position or STs/defensive scores?
MSU:
Vs AU = gained 351 total yds (194 yd rushing on 47 attempts)
Vs UA = gained 330 total yds on offense against Alabama (172 yds rushing on 49 attempts)
Vs AU = allowed 511 yds (267 pass/244 rush - with a 60+ yarder run late), 14 first downs
Vs UA = allowed 444 yds (242 pass/202 rush), 19 first downs
For any that watched both, what was key difference that led to such a different outcome? Field position or STs/defensive scores?
This post was edited on 11/14/17 at 9:06 pm
Posted on 11/14/17 at 9:07 pm to Che Boludo
I read that wrong. Sorry
This post was edited on 11/14/17 at 9:09 pm
Posted on 11/14/17 at 9:08 pm to highcotton2
Our secret weapon is gonna be Collin Sexton in the slot.
Barn fvcccccccked
Barn fvcccccccked
Posted on 11/14/17 at 9:13 pm to Che Boludo
quote:
For any that watched both, what was key difference that led to such a different outcome? Field position or STs/defensive scores?
We scored 49 and gave up 10, ya'll scored 31 and gave up 24. 1 score games are scary. Anything can happen.
This post was edited on 11/14/17 at 9:14 pm
Posted on 11/14/17 at 9:16 pm to Tigerman97
The biggest difference was Auburn got some negative plays and Fitz wasn't very good throwing. Against Alabama he made 3-4 good throws on 3rd down and we didn't get many TFLs. It let them totally control the clock and keep us off the field.
Tip of the cap to them, they did their plan about as well as possible. They had almost no explosive plays and every drive was 3 yards, 2 yards, 5 yards, 4 yards, etc. And when they got in the red zone early they scored TDs.
We only had something like 10 possessions offensively. Luckily we were really good on offense or we might have been in trouble.
Tip of the cap to them, they did their plan about as well as possible. They had almost no explosive plays and every drive was 3 yards, 2 yards, 5 yards, 4 yards, etc. And when they got in the red zone early they scored TDs.
We only had something like 10 possessions offensively. Luckily we were really good on offense or we might have been in trouble.
This post was edited on 11/14/17 at 9:17 pm
Posted on 11/14/17 at 9:51 pm to SummerOfGeorge
(no message)
Posted on 11/14/17 at 10:32 pm to nc14
quote:
rocket science
Only uneducated people say "rocket science' when referring to aerospace engineering
quote:
astronaut
When did I claim to be an astronaut
? Fun fact: six astronauts have graduated from Auburn University, including Ken Mattingly, who was supposed to fly with Apollo 13, but got held for being sick (turns out, he didn't have the measles!). He later was on the Apollo 16 mission.
This post was edited on 11/14/17 at 10:59 pm
Posted on 11/14/17 at 10:36 pm to AeroSpaceTiger
Speak English doc, we ain't scientist.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 10:39 pm to Gary Busey
quote:
Speak English doc, we ain't scientist.
I done be majorin in sum stuff ware we lonch rocketz in 2 the ski
I don't mean to come across as arrogant. Just don't like trolls.
In reality it's not any more difficult than any other engineering, it just has a cooler name
Posted on 11/14/17 at 10:42 pm to AeroSpaceTiger
quote:
Ken Mattingly
one of my favorite NY Yankees.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 10:50 pm to Tigerman97
Thread is a bit too early IMO
Posted on 11/14/17 at 10:54 pm to nc14
Lol you’re dumb as frick
Posted on 11/14/17 at 10:56 pm to AeroSpaceTiger
quote:That was Apollo 13
Ken Mattingly, who was supposed to fly with Apollo 11, but got held for being sick (turns out, he didn't have the measles!).
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News