re: I’ll admit it… Georgia has the best defense I’ve ever seen.

It ain't monteg. He spends all day in the dawgrant discord talking to himself about his 3D printer.....

Too funny. I hadnt seen HRD in a minute either

quote:

---

Princeton was one of 2 or 3 teams when they won in 1870/ That is enough to poke fun at that Natty. But how can we expect them to play a 12 game schedule when there weren't 12 teamS? But what is a fair time to consider history relevant? in 100 YEARS a 4 team playoff will look like a joke compared to whatever the game looks like then. When I was a kid everybody called games after WW II more relevant. In the 50s OU had freshman teams larger than the entire roster with modern rules.

---

I am not saying they should play a 12 game schedule. I mean it wasn't THAT long ago we were all playing an 11 game schedule.

But to count those as legit National Championships?

quote:

---

But what is a fair time to consider history relevant?

---

Actually a fair question. Nobody can answer that, but you were crapping on Alabama's titles (After rereading your post, you were not really crapping on Alabama's titles)while touting Princetons'. At least Alabama's were won when there were more than 2-3 teams playing football.

I mean, I get your point, but counting titles when there was only 3 teams playing football? Surely we can agree those were not legit titles, can't we? Even if you want to count them as legit....you wouldn't put them on the same level as Alabama's right?

I get that in 100 years they might not count the ones today. but we should today, shouldn't we? Leave the Princeton/Yale titles against 2 other teams in the 1870's to the pre 1900 teams to claim. not today's.

We are not that far apart in our thinking. The biggest difference is history is relevant to the era but it may become insignificant with enough decades or centuries. Some history lessons are timeless, like you should never loan more money to somebody than what you would or could give them

quote:

---

What we do know, is that in recent history when a good secondary faces an equally good skill player group (WR/RB/QB all of equal talent/ability), the offensive side almost always gets the better of the defensive side.

---

This is really only true with Bama 2020 and LSU 2019. Don't see anyone out there like that this year. Not yet anyway.

quote:

---

OMG! 7 pages of this shite!

---

And you just added to it.

quote:

---

They have not faced a good QB….Bo Nix is ok, but not a really good QB.

---

Have you seen the heisman watch list?

Your really good qb doesnt exist.

quote:

---

I think Richardson would score in the 20s at least on this untested defense.

---

We'll know soon unless Mullen decides not to play him ala Kyle Pitts.

quote:

---

I think Richardson would score in the 20s at least on this untested defense.

---

First year starting QBs are probably this defense's kryptonite. That's usually how it works.