Started By
Message
re: If You're STILL Complaining about a Conspiracy...........
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:06 pm to Rex
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:06 pm to Rex
Show me the penalties against Bama and their opponents for SEC games only. Show the same for Fla.
I guess we can start there. I don't know them, and dont care to research...but if it means that much to you, pull those stats up.
4
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:09 pm to aroussel3Tigers
I think if bama did not cheat with the regularity that they have in the past this may not have had the same type of impact.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:12 pm to aroussel3Tigers
If it's not a conspiracy, why are we still talking about it?
bama/refs=conspiracy
plus, most ole miss fans are in the klan
enjoy,that is all
bama/refs=conspiracy
plus, most ole miss fans are in the klan
enjoy,that is all
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:16 pm to Teague
the facts
-it was a terrible blown call which cost LSU the *opportunity* to compete for a game that was still up for grabs. the game is now over and nothing can and will be done about it.
-we have 2 more huge games vs ole miss and arky that we have to win this year
thats all that matters at this point, and we will see bama next year in baton rouge.
-it was a terrible blown call which cost LSU the *opportunity* to compete for a game that was still up for grabs. the game is now over and nothing can and will be done about it.
-we have 2 more huge games vs ole miss and arky that we have to win this year
thats all that matters at this point, and we will see bama next year in baton rouge.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:21 pm to aroussel3Tigers
quote:
Show me the penalties against Bama and their opponents for SEC games only. Show the same for Fla.
I guess we can start there. I don't know them, and dont care to research...but if it means that much to you, pull those stats up.
Here you go:
Penalties against vs. SEC teams
Bama 5th
Florida 7th
LINK
Penalties against opponents vs. SEC teams
Bama 4th
Florida 2nd
LINK
If anybody has any real facts instead of whining, feel free to post them. Otherwise, you have no complaints.
This post was edited on 11/12/09 at 9:22 pm
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:27 pm to puttytat
quote:
and I haven't admitted anything......put words in my mouth if it makes you feel justified
You have no words of your own. You have no rebuttal. So yeah, I'll put words in your mouth. "that article is crap, whahh waaaa". Which part of it is crap? Come on and tell us or else shut up about the whole thing.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:28 pm to Teague
I'm leaving now, but I'll be back tomorrow just in case any of you thought of an argument. I don't expect to see anything except, "that's BS".
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:28 pm to Teague
dude you cannot bring in a blog from al.com and establish creditability. frick that is like Moveon. org trying to say bush knew about 911.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:34 pm to aroussel3Tigers
It's pretty obvious that Teague is a little disturbed about Bama being involved in all of this negative talk. Hell, I'm already over the bullshite calls against us and we lost.
Teague, let it go fellow, and enjoy your season. You may even get a ship.
Ask me if I gave a shite when USC thought they were better than our BCS ship team. Hell no.
Controversy, it lives on when we don't let go.
Teague, let it go fellow, and enjoy your season. You may even get a ship.
Ask me if I gave a shite when USC thought they were better than our BCS ship team. Hell no.
Controversy, it lives on when we don't let go.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:37 pm to aroussel3Tigers
I'm still failing to see how this is not a conspiracy.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 9:48 pm to Teague
quote:
Show me one point that is incorrect in what he said. You jackasses are just full of shite and have NOTHING to back it up with.
be glad to, although i'm not concerned about any conspiracy theories.
quote:
My bigger question is whether or not Julio Jones touching the ball (he did) makes it a dead ball because he was out of bounds (he was).
quote:
Eligibility Lost by Going Out of Bounds
ARTICLE 4. No eligible offensive receiver who goes out of bounds during a
down shall touch a legal forward pass in the field of play or end zones or while
airborne until it has been touched by an opponent or official (A.R. 7-3-4-I-III).
PENALTY—Loss of down at the previous spot [S16 and S9].
so he can't down it before PP gets the chance to intercept it. not gonna weigh in on the rest though, i don't believe in a provable conspiracy. i just think we're putting up with plain old unacceptable officiating.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 10:33 pm to Teague
I don't believe in the conspiracy theory stuff anyway but
1) starts out by questioning it was caught by peterson, whether it was touched by jones, whether he was in bounds... pretty much a non-starter if he pretends to be objective. Makes a couple inaccurate claims about the rules anyway (which would only apply anyway if jones touched the ball - which he did not)
Any reasonable gump knows that was an interception and just points out LSU had work to do if they were going to do anything with it and leaves it at that
2) then it goes on to obsess about overall stats instead of noting a couple weird calls went both alabama's and florida's way when they needed them to ensure wins... that's the suspicious part to people that do believe in the conspiracy stuff
1) starts out by questioning it was caught by peterson, whether it was touched by jones, whether he was in bounds... pretty much a non-starter if he pretends to be objective. Makes a couple inaccurate claims about the rules anyway (which would only apply anyway if jones touched the ball - which he did not)
Any reasonable gump knows that was an interception and just points out LSU had work to do if they were going to do anything with it and leaves it at that
2) then it goes on to obsess about overall stats instead of noting a couple weird calls went both alabama's and florida's way when they needed them to ensure wins... that's the suspicious part to people that do believe in the conspiracy stuff
Posted on 11/12/09 at 10:43 pm to Teague
In the comments section...
quote:
I think it's pretty funny that an Alabama writer is writing a column about officiating. Are you seriously trying to make an argument that human beings are not naturally biased? Because if so, it's a pretty silly argument.
Please find out where the SEC officials are from, and give us percentages by state. Quit using the artificial "numbers" that make your silly argument look decent.
Ironic ... An Alabama sportswriter, writing a pro-Alabama article, yet contending against biases. Very nice journalism, my friend. Way to stay objective.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 11:39 pm to Teague
Eat a bowl of dicks teague, and go post ur dumb shite on a gump board u shite stirring maggot.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 11:43 pm to Cornholio
quote:
Eat a bowl of dicks teague, and go post ur dumb shite on a gump board u shite stirring maggot.
this is the gump board biatch.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 11:51 pm to Funky Tide 8
No it isn't, it's TIGERdroppings.com. Now go back to playing butt darts with your boyfriend, you maggot.
This post was edited on 11/12/09 at 11:54 pm
Posted on 11/12/09 at 11:52 pm to Cornholio
its the GUMPrant.
Posted on 11/13/09 at 12:21 am to Funky Tide 8
One of the dumbest article I've read in a long time... This guy was probably drunk when he was watching the game or probably didn't even watch the game at all and is just writing about shite he heard from the gumps. The whole nation watched it and they would disagree to every word this guy said. 
This post was edited on 11/13/09 at 12:23 am
Posted on 11/13/09 at 12:35 am to MoreOrLes
quote:
I think if bama did not cheat with the regularity that they have in the past this may not have had the same type of impact.
Since when does one incident involving a booster paying Albert Means qualify as "cheating with regularity"?
Posted on 11/13/09 at 12:39 am to bamaboy87
arse darts: bamas favorite game
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News