Started By
Message
If we were officially allowed to pay athletes
Posted on 1/24/20 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 1/24/20 at 2:58 pm
What school would win? USC?
6
Posted on 1/24/20 at 2:59 pm to fareplay
Are you fishing for complements because you know your athletic department has the highest revenue?
Posted on 1/24/20 at 3:01 pm to fareplay
quote:
If we were officially allowed
Why would making it official change anything?
Posted on 1/24/20 at 3:02 pm to fareplay
Harvard.
Posted on 1/24/20 at 3:07 pm to fareplay
Well Aggie already over pays their coaches so we know they won’t pay for the right talent on the field...
Posted on 1/24/20 at 3:10 pm to EKG
quote:
Harvard.
ridiculous. Harvard much too snooty to pay students.
Posted on 1/24/20 at 3:11 pm to TwoDatBait
It’s only overpaying if it’s an issue for the parties involved.
I wouldn’t pay any of these guys a fraction of what they earn.
But if the employer extends the offer, and the candidate accepts?
It is what it is.
I will forever remain puzzled why any of you ever bring up this topic.
I have great respect for almost every SEC institution; but I couldn’t care less what you pay your employees.
I wouldn’t pay any of these guys a fraction of what they earn.
But if the employer extends the offer, and the candidate accepts?
It is what it is.
I will forever remain puzzled why any of you ever bring up this topic.
I have great respect for almost every SEC institution; but I couldn’t care less what you pay your employees.
Posted on 1/24/20 at 3:22 pm to EKG
Harvard doesn't even put their athletes on scholarship.
Posted on 1/24/20 at 3:23 pm to fareplay
Aggies. Based on jimbos contract of course
Posted on 1/24/20 at 4:47 pm to fareplay
The school would never pay athletes, the NCAA would just allow them to license their image and put that on the market. They could make commercials or sell video games or what not. Nothing would change at atm.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News