Started By
Message
If that was targeting
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:43 pm
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:43 pm
Then the play in the endzone in the A&M/Miami game was certainly targeting. It was way worse.
4
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:44 pm to Hugh McElroy
I support the rule but that dude was not defenseless and was a runner
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:46 pm to GetmorewithLes
He was definitely a runner and not defenseless
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:47 pm to GetmorewithLes
quote:
I support the rule but that dude was not defenseless and was a runner
What dude? In the A&M game? He was textbook defenseless.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:47 pm to Hugh McElroy
Bruh he hit him square in the face. Textbook targeting.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:47 pm to LCLa
As a runner
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:48 pm to Hugh McElroy
Tackler did everything right, still punished. NCAA is asshoe.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:48 pm to Hugh McElroy
quote:
quote:I support the rule but that dude was not defenseless and was a runner What dude? In the A&M game? He was textbook defenseless
He is talking about this game. No one cares about the A&M game anymore.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:49 pm to Hugh McElroy
No. Tonight. He had turned up and was running. Not defenseless.
When I got home after the A&M
game I was shocked not one overture was made/asked for a targeting call. And it was so obvious.
When I got home after the A&M
game I was shocked not one overture was made/asked for a targeting call. And it was so obvious.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:49 pm to Hugh McElroy
quote:
the A&M/Miami game
No one cares
Go back to watching youtube highlights of your regular season
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:50 pm to Dingeaux
quote:
He was definitely a runner and not defenseless
Say what? He was held by other defender and unable to move or dodge hit. Hit was 100% at his head.
There have been so many bogus targeting calls this year and that was one of the most legit ones you will ever see.
Think about why the rule was made.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 8:52 pm to OU Guy
I cere. We should still be playing.
We should have at least had two plays from the one yard line to force OT.
We should have at least had two plays from the one yard line to force OT.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:08 pm to Hugh McElroy
On second look slo mo I know its technically targeting (head/neck area) but defender did turn his head away to try and not hit helmet to helmet.
Rule says hits to head/neck are targeting.
Rule says hits to head/neck are targeting.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News