Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

I know I’m preaching to the choir, but...

Posted on 1/3/18 at 3:20 pm
Posted by InsideTheTide
Montgomery, AL
Member since Aug 2017
1044 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 3:20 pm
IMO people saying that UCF belonged in the playoff should think about this...

Swap UCF with any team in the playoffs. What are the odds that UCF goes unscathed with their schedules versus the odds that one of the 4 teams goes unscathed with UCFs schedule?

Could this possibly be one of the factors that crossed the committees mind?

This is just my opinion, and I could be crazy for having it. Thoughts?
Posted by fareplay
Member since Nov 2012
4838 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 3:21 pm to
Noone cares, either you are talking about aranda or you arent talking
Posted by InsideTheTide
Montgomery, AL
Member since Aug 2017
1044 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 3:22 pm to
Quite frankly, no one outside of Lousianna and Texas give a shite about that right now.
Posted by GameCocky88
Mount Pleasant, SC
Member since Dec 2015
4837 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 3:23 pm to
It was a lot easier sell before they buttfricked Auburn by double digies
Posted by InsideTheTide
Montgomery, AL
Member since Aug 2017
1044 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 3:24 pm to
Auburn isn’t a good team away from JH though. I don’t understand why people can’t see that.
Posted by UGATiger26
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2009
9044 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

Could this possibly be one of the factors that crossed the committees mind?


It's the same reason that Hawaii didn't play for the NC in 2007. Their schedule was terrible.

I agree that there need to be some changes in CFB. Whether that's expanding the playoffs, altering the regular season schedules, etc. I don't know.

But I do know that people can't use UCF's win over Auburn to retroactively argue that they should've been included in the playoffs, whose participants were decided before the Peach Bowl was played.

Had UCF beaten Auburn in the regular season, then they would have a valid argument.

It's like a high school senior who submits an average application to MIT and gets denied. Then he decides to single-handedly build a rocket engine, and tells MIT "See what I did? Why did you deny me?" Their response would be "Well shite son, had you submitted that information along with your application, we probably would've made a different decision."
This post was edited on 1/3/18 at 3:59 pm
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44021 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

What are the odds that UCF goes unscathed with their schedules versus the odds that one of the 4 teams goes unscathed with UCFs schedule?

No way to know.
But UCF went out and did all that they were asked to do.
Surely you can understand why they may be disappointed.
I sure as heck would be.
Posted by InsideTheTide
Montgomery, AL
Member since Aug 2017
1044 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 3:35 pm to
I can understand the disappointment, but as football program that wants to be taken seriously you have to put at least one or two decent teams on your schedule if you want to play for the big dance. We’ve seen this happen with multiple teams in the past. Just last year Western Michigan was undefeated in the regular season and no one cried when they weren’t put into the playoffs.
Posted by Tuscaloosa
11x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
46613 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 3:36 pm to
Literally nobody alive truly believes UCF deserved to be in or deserves to be called a national champion. They bring it up to poke at the system, the SEC, and the Bama/UGA fan bases.
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44021 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 3:40 pm to
I don’t disagree with you; but as a smaller program, there’s only so much you can do.
I’m just saying it’s impossible to speak in hypotheticals (e.g., “What if Team X played Team Y’s schedule?”).
I 100% get their frustration.
Same argument TCU used to have; and at present, there’s no answer.
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
24927 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 3:40 pm to
UCF this year was no more deserving (perhaps less so) than other undefeated teams who were not considered for the sport's national championship as they clearly weren't playing the same caliber football as the big boys. E.g. TCU (2010), Boise (2006, 2009), Auburn (2004), Utah (2004, 2008), Marshall (1999), Tulane (1998), (Auburn 1993), etc. Winning one game in a meaningless bowl doesn't make up for the rest of the season.
Posted by Johnny B Goode
Fort Campbell, KY
Member since Jul 2012
2061 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Literally nobody alive truly believes UCF deserved to be in or deserves to be called a national champion. They bring it up to poke at the system, the SEC, and the Bama/UGA fan bases.




I agree, this is nothing but a smart PR stunt by the UCF AD.
Posted by ColoBama
The Kayng of College Fusball, CO
Member since Dec 2016
7433 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

but as a smaller program, there’s only so much you can do.


WRONG.

Join a real conference. They can always do that. It may take a LONG time but no day like the present to get started on it.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83462 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

It was a lot easier sell before they buttfricked Auburn by double digies
What game did you watch?
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44021 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

Join a real conference.

Just like that, huh?
The University of Houston has been campaigning to join a “real” conference for years.
It’s been their entire existence, of late.
I think you know that’s not how it works.


I’m not suggesting that any of the teams who made the CFP shouldn’t have.
But if you can’t see why UCF’s players and fans may be bummed, there’s not much I can say.
Posted by Michael354
Member since Sep 2017
94 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 4:01 pm to
If UCF think they're so good let them be in the SEC conference and face names such as Alabama, Clemson, Georgia, etc and we'll see how long they stay undefeated.
Posted by UAtide11
Member since Apr 2014
2190 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

What are the odds that UCF goes unscathed with their schedules versus the odds that one of the 4 teams goes unscathed with UCFs schedule?


Name the playoff participant that went unscathed with their own schedule first.

I mean Wisconsin's schedule was no better than UCF's and they were a conference championship away from being in.


People like to act like the bottom 2/3 of the SEC (or Big10, Big12, Pac12, whatever) is way better than it really is. Is the average SEC schedule tougher than an AAC schedule, sure it is. Could you fill out an SEC schedule that was as weak as UCF's schedule, I think you could.
This post was edited on 1/3/18 at 4:19 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter