Started By
Message
re: How do you rank the dumpster fires?
Posted on 9/17/24 at 11:32 am to pankReb
Posted on 9/17/24 at 11:32 am to pankReb
quote:
You simped for Jamie’s fricking Winston for years. You’ve lost the right to have thoughts on anything.
You think your program is better than anything mid tier. Far more delusional. Hold onto that baseball natty tight
Posted on 9/17/24 at 11:37 am to Insurancerebel
How much available for NIL isn't public, so all the rankings are pretty subjective. The best things to look at for available data for a school's wealth is the size of the endowment and athletic revenues.
The endowment at Ole Miss is around $800 million. Florida's is about $2.4 billion.
Ole Miss's athletic revenues were about $142 million. UF's were around $189 million.
The endowment at Ole Miss is around $800 million. Florida's is about $2.4 billion.
Ole Miss's athletic revenues were about $142 million. UF's were around $189 million.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 11:41 am to whatiknowsofar
Jamies. Winston.
Hey remember when you managed 10 wins with a Heisman qb and two NFL wide receivers?
Also remember when you one-man-army’d the Saints aboard for Jamies fricking Winston?

Hey remember when you managed 10 wins with a Heisman qb and two NFL wide receivers?
Also remember when you one-man-army’d the Saints aboard for Jamies fricking Winston?

Posted on 9/17/24 at 11:51 am to pankReb
quote:
Hey remember when you managed 10 wins with a Heisman qb and two NFL wide receivers?
I do. It would've been Ole Miss's best season ever.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 11:53 am to Landmass
Miss St and Florida are the worst…. Just bleak, bleak situations.
LSU has plenty of talent and BK is recruiting extremely well. They’ll be fine. Jury is out on whether he can win a championship, and my suspicion is that he cannot. I think LSU will be a perennial 9-3 or 10-2 team, make the playoff frequently, but not win any championships.
Arkansas has a bit of hope. They look better than expected. Their issues are systemic in that they are located in a small state with relatively low talent… far from a coast. Just don’t see how that program ever turns the corner no matter who the coach is.
Vandy is Vandy. They are just who they are. The right coach can come in and win 7-8 games if everything falls into line, but that’s their ceiling. And it’s unreasonable to expect that type of low bar success to become common. It might be achieved for a 1-2 year stint (like under James Franklin) but it can’t be sustained.
Kentucky is similar to Arkansas. The football program is systemically flawed to be able to achieve real, national success… due to geography, proximity to talent, etc. Stoops is in for some trouble. He benefited massively from Divisions, having MS State as his annual West opponent, and Louisville being down for quite some time. All that is changing with the new scheduling format.
From 2016-2023, Kentucky won 61 total games, with more than 70% of those wins coming against either FCS opponents or teams that failed to have a winning record. In the last 8 seasons, exactly HALF of all Kentucky’s SEC opponents have failed to finish the season with a winning record (Vandy 8x, Missouri 5x, Miss St 5x, Florida 4x, S Carolina 4x, Tennessee 3x, rotating West opponent 3x).
On top of playing BY FAR the easiest conference schedule of any SEC program, they have also played the easiest OOC schedule… playing 2.5 OOC opponents per season that were either FCS or finished with a losing record.
Total this up, and in the past 8 seasons Stoops has benefited by playing 6.5 games per seasons against opponents who were FCS or finished with a losing record. Of course he’s going to average 7.6 wins per season when he starts out with such an easy advantage. With the new scheduling format though, that advantage of playing in the East goes away, and Stoops will win fewer games as a result. And it will get worse when we go to a 9-game conference schedule. Sell your Kentucky stock.
Auburn is not going to have a great year. If we win this weekend against Arkansas, I think we can win 6-7 games. If we lose this weekend God help us. But with the way Freeze is recruiting I expect Auburn to be competing for championships again in 2025 and beyond. Long term future is bright.
Texas A&M is sitting on a lot of talent. Elko seems to be recruiting well. I think a consistent 7-10 wins is likely over the coming year with a playoff birth every 4-5 years.
South Carolina- I like Beamer and I hope he does well. I think they get to 6 wins this year and I think 5-7 wins will likely be the norm there due to the competitive nature of the league.
Looking out to the rest of this year and into the next 5 years, I’d rank the current state/trajectory of the SEC like this… ie ranking the programs on how many games I think they’ll win between now and the end of the decade:
1. Georgia
2. Texas
3. Alabama
4. LSU
5. Tennessee
6. Auburn
7. Texas A&M
8. Oklahoma
9. Ole Miss
10. Missouri
11. Florida
12. South Carolina
13. Arkansas
14. Miss St
15. Kentucky
16. Vanderbilt
LSU has plenty of talent and BK is recruiting extremely well. They’ll be fine. Jury is out on whether he can win a championship, and my suspicion is that he cannot. I think LSU will be a perennial 9-3 or 10-2 team, make the playoff frequently, but not win any championships.
Arkansas has a bit of hope. They look better than expected. Their issues are systemic in that they are located in a small state with relatively low talent… far from a coast. Just don’t see how that program ever turns the corner no matter who the coach is.
Vandy is Vandy. They are just who they are. The right coach can come in and win 7-8 games if everything falls into line, but that’s their ceiling. And it’s unreasonable to expect that type of low bar success to become common. It might be achieved for a 1-2 year stint (like under James Franklin) but it can’t be sustained.
Kentucky is similar to Arkansas. The football program is systemically flawed to be able to achieve real, national success… due to geography, proximity to talent, etc. Stoops is in for some trouble. He benefited massively from Divisions, having MS State as his annual West opponent, and Louisville being down for quite some time. All that is changing with the new scheduling format.
From 2016-2023, Kentucky won 61 total games, with more than 70% of those wins coming against either FCS opponents or teams that failed to have a winning record. In the last 8 seasons, exactly HALF of all Kentucky’s SEC opponents have failed to finish the season with a winning record (Vandy 8x, Missouri 5x, Miss St 5x, Florida 4x, S Carolina 4x, Tennessee 3x, rotating West opponent 3x).
On top of playing BY FAR the easiest conference schedule of any SEC program, they have also played the easiest OOC schedule… playing 2.5 OOC opponents per season that were either FCS or finished with a losing record.
Total this up, and in the past 8 seasons Stoops has benefited by playing 6.5 games per seasons against opponents who were FCS or finished with a losing record. Of course he’s going to average 7.6 wins per season when he starts out with such an easy advantage. With the new scheduling format though, that advantage of playing in the East goes away, and Stoops will win fewer games as a result. And it will get worse when we go to a 9-game conference schedule. Sell your Kentucky stock.
Auburn is not going to have a great year. If we win this weekend against Arkansas, I think we can win 6-7 games. If we lose this weekend God help us. But with the way Freeze is recruiting I expect Auburn to be competing for championships again in 2025 and beyond. Long term future is bright.
Texas A&M is sitting on a lot of talent. Elko seems to be recruiting well. I think a consistent 7-10 wins is likely over the coming year with a playoff birth every 4-5 years.
South Carolina- I like Beamer and I hope he does well. I think they get to 6 wins this year and I think 5-7 wins will likely be the norm there due to the competitive nature of the league.
Looking out to the rest of this year and into the next 5 years, I’d rank the current state/trajectory of the SEC like this… ie ranking the programs on how many games I think they’ll win between now and the end of the decade:
1. Georgia
2. Texas
3. Alabama
4. LSU
5. Tennessee
6. Auburn
7. Texas A&M
8. Oklahoma
9. Ole Miss
10. Missouri
11. Florida
12. South Carolina
13. Arkansas
14. Miss St
15. Kentucky
16. Vanderbilt
Posted on 9/17/24 at 11:53 am to whatiknowsofar
quote:
It would've been Ole Miss's best season ever.

And that’s STILL not the best you think it is. But I wouldn’t expect anything less from the Winston Simp.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 12:00 pm to Landmass
quote:
Hopeless right now: - MSU - Florida - LSU (Because they have Brian Kelly)
You know what’s hilarious. Brian Kelly accomplished (at LSU) in just one year what Ole Miss has never been able to do. Yet…. LSU is hopeless. Got it. lol
Posted on 9/17/24 at 12:05 pm to Tammany Tom
quote:
You know what’s hilarious. Brian Kelly accomplished (at LSU) in just one year what Ole Miss has never been able to do. Yet…. LSU is hopeless. Got it. lol
It’s the same tired line every one of you idiots repeats.

Congrats on him winning the division that one year.
He followed it up by shitting the bed while having a Heisman QB and two NFL WRs.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 12:30 pm to pankReb
quote:
we’ve already corrected you on this.
I'm sorry. I didn't look all the way back to 196fricking2 to find your best season. Congrats.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 12:31 pm to pankReb
quote:
He followed it up by shitting the bed while having a Heisman QB and two NFL WRs.
As opposed to lane just shitting the bed regularly.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 12:32 pm to Landmass
My only safe space is our National Championships and Sec titles. Plus knowing between dropping fries at McDonalds your on your phone obsessed with LSU.
Enjoy your season cause you gonna lose your coach. Then you will be back to wishing for Egg Bowl wins. Would say act like a winner but then again, it’s Ole Miss.
Enjoy your season cause you gonna lose your coach. Then you will be back to wishing for Egg Bowl wins. Would say act like a winner but then again, it’s Ole Miss.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 12:34 pm to AUTiger789
It took until page 4 to have a decent reply. 

Posted on 9/17/24 at 12:45 pm to whatiknowsofar
Still wrong and still an idiot. But carry on.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 12:47 pm to whatiknowsofar
Continuing to prove to us that you don’t understand how words work. To the surprise of no one.
I notice you keep ignoring the Winston mentions. Are you finally understanding that he’s a fricking bum?
I notice you keep ignoring the Winston mentions. Are you finally understanding that he’s a fricking bum?
Posted on 9/17/24 at 12:52 pm to AUTiger789
quote:
Auburn is not going to have a great year. If we win this weekend against Arkansas, I think we can win 6-7 games. If we lose this weekend God help us. But with the way Freeze is recruiting I expect Auburn to be competing for championships again in 2025 and beyond. Long term future is bright.
You boogs need to come to the understanding that there is no long term commitment from high school recruits anymore. Hell, if Freeze doesn’t pony up millions this offseason you’re going to lose your 3 Jerry Rice wide receivers, that’s a guarantee.
Recruiting no longer builds a foundation for long term success, majority of the players transfer if they are worth a damn after 1-2 years.
The key is plugging those holes, and Freeze didn’t do shite when it was obvious he needed a new QB.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 12:54 pm to Landmass
Pretty rich coming from an Ole Miss fan. Your team has never won anything of importance ever. Congrats on nothing.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 1:04 pm to pankReb
quote:
It’s the same tired line every one of you idiots repeats. Congrats on him winning the division that one year. He followed it up by shitting the bed while having a Heisman QB and two NFL WRs.
Look Clown, I’m not a Brian Kelly fan. I’m a LSU fan. And…. The reality is this: We are one of only a handful of programs that can win national championships with just about any coach (Les Miles & Ed O are proof positive). Will everyone we hire win one? Probably not, but the ones that don’t win a championship will have significantly better success than 80% of the schools in this conference.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 1:09 pm to pankReb
quote:
I notice you keep ignoring the Winston mentions. Are you finally understanding that he’s a fricking bum?
Ive never seen a poster melt harder about a player than you not accepting that Winston played well for the saints. It fricks your world up hahhaa
Posted on 9/17/24 at 1:15 pm to Tammany Tom
quote:
Probably not, but the ones that don’t win a championship will have significantly better success than 80% of the schools in this conference.
Which further melts panky. He would kill for the two year run BK had, or even a handful of Miles seasons, and the 2019 team Ed had is better than anything Ole Miss will ever put out.
Popular
Back to top
