Started By
Message
re: How Accurate are these Clemson posters talking about Alabama?
Posted on 1/3/16 at 7:54 pm to SlowEasyConfident
Posted on 1/3/16 at 7:54 pm to SlowEasyConfident
quote:
The Clemson secondary is vastly superior to michigan states. If he does that vs Clemson I would be surprised
I think Clemson does have a somewhat better pass defense and probably a better pass rush. But do you have as good a run defense as MSU? I don't think so.
We'll see.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 7:58 pm to GTSwarms
It's pretty much Clemson's version of Tidefans.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:01 pm to GTSwarms
I've seen some Clemson fans talking about how Chad Kelly could beat Alabama as a reason they can beat Bama. I would love nothing more than their only loss coming to a team whose only loss was to Swag Kelly.
Here's to hoping the Natty turns out like the Krystal on Bourbon Street with Bama putting nuts on their opponent's face.
Here's to hoping the Natty turns out like the Krystal on Bourbon Street with Bama putting nuts on their opponent's face.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:03 pm to BallstotheWesleyWall
I actually like Clemson's chances in this game. Bama is sold but their run game can be stopped if you sell out. Clemson is a very good passing team and Bama has shown some lapses in that area. I think this game will be pretty entertaining.
That being said, if Watson isn't accurate or mobile enough this could get ugly late in the game.
That being said, if Watson isn't accurate or mobile enough this could get ugly late in the game.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:05 pm to SurfTide
quote:
Dabo Swinney prays to God because he is a good Christian man. God clearly prefers Clemson.



Im pulling for Bama based on this and for the fact that Pawl said Saban would retire if he wins another Natty.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:14 pm to GTSwarms
We will Rush 4 and the will think they are being blitzed every play.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:15 pm to BallstotheWesleyWall
Treadwell is a much better receiver than any of Clemson's. Clemson has one receiver in the top 100 for receiving yards, and he's at #61. I don't buy that Watson is going to have a good day passing like Chad Kelly. It'll be much more like Dak's day vs. Alabama. They don't have a mismatch in the passing game, especially with Alabama's pass rush being the best in college football.
Watson is fast though and he'll scramble for a couple of first downs and if they run the option effectively, it could give Alabama trouble on a couple of drives.
Things I buy:
Alabama rushes for 200 yards+
Clemson holds Alabama under 200 yards passing
Watson gets picked twice (he has thrown 11 picks this season)
Things I don't buy:
Clemson rushing for more than 150
Clemson passing for more than 250
Watson not getting knocked down A TON
It'll be an even game for a while, I think Alabama pulls away with special teams, turnovers, or just getting points from drives. Something like 28-21
Watson is fast though and he'll scramble for a couple of first downs and if they run the option effectively, it could give Alabama trouble on a couple of drives.
Things I buy:
Alabama rushes for 200 yards+
Clemson holds Alabama under 200 yards passing
Watson gets picked twice (he has thrown 11 picks this season)
Things I don't buy:
Clemson rushing for more than 150
Clemson passing for more than 250
Watson not getting knocked down A TON
It'll be an even game for a while, I think Alabama pulls away with special teams, turnovers, or just getting points from drives. Something like 28-21
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:15 pm to BamaScoop
Clemson o line is pretty good. But we will see
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:27 pm to SlowEasyConfident
quote:
The Clemson secondary is vastly superior to michigan states. If he does that vs Clemson I would be surprised
This^^^^
MSU's secondary is nowhere near what it was two years ago. A couple of their DBs are playing on Sundays. I give Alabama a ton of credit for finally using Coker. He played very well while Henry was being contained all game. I think Connor Cook did his team no favors by holding onto the ball too long as well. He has always been a 50% pass completion guy but his receivers played scared too. They had a horrible run offense all year, so going against Bama wasn't going to help this. I was amazed at Alabama's ability to bat the ball down at the LOS. Watson will bring a different element to the game. It should be a good one.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:36 pm to FvlleTIGER777
quote:
I hope they score 48 and beat bama by 30
21-0
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:40 pm to GTSwarms
Doesn't seem accurate, but I will bookmark for laughs for after Bama loses.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:41 pm to SlowEasyConfident
quote:
Clemson o line is pretty good. But we will see
A lot of people's o-lines have been pretty good
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:42 pm to GTSwarms
I don't see what's so ridiculous about them thinking they can beat Alabama. It's not that hard.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:43 pm to GTSwarms
The posters on tigernet are the most delusional bunch I've ever seen. How do you South Carolina fans deal with them?
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:46 pm to Mobtro
quote:
I just don't think that they will score a ton of points against our defense . Call me crazy , but the fact that they are so woefully one dimensional gives me pause . Our defense is tough . Motivated and tough . Rested , motivated and tough . Henry is a horse , but we will see about him in the gameplan. What do ya got besides that , Nicky ? Our offense is clicking too . No mention of that . All the pundits want to talk about is how stout and hige Alabama's defense is . Hmmph.
This post was edited on 1/3/16 at 8:49 pm
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:54 pm to Mobtro
My guess is the Taters own the cocks' asses in the all time series so the cocks have to tolerate it. Spurrier gone, so Dabo gets the last laugh against SCe.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:55 pm to OBReb6
quote:
I don't see what's so ridiculous about them thinking they can beat Alabama. It's not that hard.
But Memphis is a killer.

Posted on 1/3/16 at 8:58 pm to Mobtro
quote:
How do you South Carolina fans deal with them?
They throw batteries
Posted on 1/3/16 at 9:03 pm to SlowEasyConfident
Clemson could win (I don't think they do), but their rationale is ignorant.
Popular
Back to top
