Started By
Message

re: Herbstreit: People are failing to grasp this is a new era

Posted on 11/4/15 at 10:12 am to
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
26152 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 10:12 am to
quote:

LSU is #2 in the playoff poll, ahead of defending champ Ohio State and all they want to talk about is where Alabama is ranked. It is pathetic.


I think the entire SEC would agree, Ohio State doesn't really deserve that 3 spot. Florida, IMO is more deserving. Plus, the committee ranked LSU higher than both other polls, so we benefitted as well.

And mark it down, if LSU loses a close one on Saturday, I doubt we fall below 5. The committee will reward LSU for one loss on the road to a top 4 team (although I don't understand their hate towards UF?)
Posted by Bamatab
Member since Jan 2013
16137 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 10:22 am to
quote:

(although I don't understand their hate towards UF?)

I'm pretty sure that they took into account that UF lost their starting QB. Harris isn't near as proficient of a QB as Grier was, especially in McElwain's system. If Grier was still the starting QB, they would be ranked higher.
Posted by gatortrav88
Member since Oct 2014
3807 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 10:30 am to
The sec ain't good Enough for that to happen
Posted by cjared036
Houston, tx
Member since Dec 2009
9569 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 10:35 am to
i agree with this.

does not matter tho. we lose this weekend and we gone...

we win this weekend and we are legitimate top 4 team.

I think the CFB people enjoy watching people lose their minds over this.
Posted by Skeeterpop
Member since Oct 2014
421 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 10:41 am to
Rankings and Perception at the time you play are more important than weeks later.

Anyone can go out and beat Tiger Woods on the golf course today. Beating him today and being ranked ahead of him is no where near what it would have meant several years ago in his prime.

When you play a team who is mentally on a roll, has all their major playmakers and undefeated. They are a better team at that point than they would be weeks later with multiple injuries and having been beat and lost that mental momentum and confidence.

Look at boxing. Mike Tyson had beat people before the bell had even rung. He was thought of as the greatest fighter in decades. Then when someone didnt fall and took him to the wire and won, all of a sudden he was not as good. Its perception and perception is reality.
Posted by RandySavage
Member since May 2012
33587 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 10:59 am to
quote:

Ummmm...when we played them Georgia and Aggie were Top 10 teams and Wisky was ranked Top 20 as well. We also lost to a ranked Ole Miss team. Bama has by far played a tougher schedule and had more quality wins.


Oh, you're going with the well they were ranked when we played them angle? Gotcha, yea that's brilliant. I guess ND needs credit for that top 15 win over 3-6 Georgia Tech.

Texas A&M I'll admit I forgot about. After they got destroyed by Ole Miss I forgot about them and had no clue they could be ranked after that.
This post was edited on 11/4/15 at 11:08 am
Posted by Taurus 357
Great Lakes
Member since Dec 2014
4994 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:00 am to
quote:

Florida, IMO is more deserving.

Based on what, a close call to Kentucky, Tennessee and East Carolina? Tennessee got beat by Arky, who got beat by Toledo, who just got beat by a team that gave Ohio State all it could handle. Florida is playing very good, but they got a Georgia and Mizzou who are so offensively challenged that it's considered a plus by either team to just make it to the red zone. LSU ran all over them. That's a fact. UF is about where they should be right now.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
71474 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Based on what, a close call to Kentucky, Tennessee and East Carolina? Tennessee got beat by Arky, who got beat by Toledo, who just got beat by a team that gave Ohio State all it could handle


And Alabama lost to Ole Miss who lost to Memphis who barely beat Bowling green, Cincinatti and South Florida. Your point?

Transitive properties play absolutely no role in these rankings, so your logic is null and void.
Posted by Indigold
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2013
1710 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Because that's not how playoffs work. The regular season is to find the best teams. The playoffs is a tournament with those teams

The regular season is a tournament. At least it used to be..
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
79860 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:13 am to
quote:

and yet, no computers or human polls agree with the chorus of you butthurt lsu fans. strange how that works. must be a conspiracy.





Who is butt hurt here? So you think LSU fans are the only ones that don't think bama should be 4? Did you even watch the selection show or any other espn show after the rankings came out? No, instead you are bitching on an LSU website.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:16 am to
quote:

Rankings and Perception at the time you play are more important than weeks later.

Anyone can go out and beat Tiger Woods on the golf course today. Beating him today and being ranked ahead of him is no where near what it would have meant several years ago in his prime.

When you play a team who is mentally on a roll, has all their major playmakers and undefeated. They are a better team at that point than they would be weeks later with multiple injuries and having been beat and lost that mental momentum and confidence.

Look at boxing. Mike Tyson had beat people before the bell had even rung. He was thought of as the greatest fighter in decades. Then when someone didnt fall and took him to the wire and won, all of a sudden he was not as good. Its perception and perception is reality.

That there is all wrong.

For one thing, you're combining two separate and distinct ranking systems. You are also taking into account preseason rankings which everyone seems to agree are meaningless - until they want to use them to bolster their team's SOS.

Auburn was ranked #6 in the preseason and #18 when LSU beat them. LSU has no business claiming that win over Auburn as a top-20 win.
Posted by Taurus 357
Great Lakes
Member since Dec 2014
4994 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:21 am to
Look man. I didn't create the transitive property. I'm only accentuating the narrative that a lot of the Ranters have. Team X beat Team Y, who beat team Z. But team Z smoked team X.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
71474 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:23 am to
quote:

I didn't create the transitive property


I didn't insinuate that you did.

quote:

I'm only accentuating the narrative that a lot of the Ranters have. Team X beat Team Y, who beat team Z. But team Z smoked team X


We are not talking about rant logic; read the OP. We are talking about the playoff design. And the playoff design does not include transitive property.
Posted by 14&Counting
Dallas, TX
Member since Jul 2012
40198 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:26 am to
quote:

, you're going with the well they were ranked when we played them angle? Gotcha, yea that's brilliant.


Do you not see the flaw in your logic....Bama beats Team X. Team X was a Top 10 team when Bama played them. Bama beats the crap out of Team X and Team X drops in the polls. Hence, everyone says Team X isn't a quality win because they are now not ranked as high.

It's a ridiculous premise.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
71474 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:28 am to
Hoping you saw my post in the other thread that LSU has the highest SOS in the SEC. No need for you to spew the idiocy that Alabama has a tougher schedule when they statistically do not. Not to mention you get LSU at home and LSU gets Bama on the road.

Carry on.
Posted by Taurus 357
Great Lakes
Member since Dec 2014
4994 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:29 am to
All right then. If it's just your opinion that Florida should be higher then it's just my opinion that they are where they should be. Hopefully the committee gets this part correct, and I think I'm in the majority on this: the SEC champ will get a bid. But let's say Florida wins out until the SEC title game and loses in a tight game. If it's to Bama with 1 loss, does the committee consider LSU with their only loss to Bama as a second SEC team like 2012? Now it's moot if Florida wins out anyways. But if Florida wins out and wins a nail biter in Atlanta vs. Unbeaten LSU would the Tigers be the second team in?
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
71474 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:31 am to
I think your scenario is tough to predict because we still have Notre Dame, TCU and Baylor. I'd need to know how they ended up in tis scenario.

I do not think a non SEC champ, with 1 loss (even if only to bama on the road) is going to get in over an undefeated Big 12 champ.
Posted by 14&Counting
Dallas, TX
Member since Jul 2012
40198 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:32 am to
quote:

Hoping you saw my post in the other thread that LSU has the highest SOS in the SEC.


No I missed it but frankly find that hard to believe. LSU has one quality win over Florida...It's next best win is a 2-point victory over the Grinders. Your OOC win was over probably the worst team in the ACC and you will play exactly one less game than everyone else. Not LSU's fault of course but Bama was playing #20 Power 5 Wisky at a neutral site.

Tell me again about that schedule.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
71474 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:37 am to
quote:

Tell me again about that schedule.



Ok, I can tell you again since you asked.

LSU has the highest SOS in the SEC.
Posted by 14&Counting
Dallas, TX
Member since Jul 2012
40198 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:38 am to
quote:

LSU has the highest SOS in the SEC


Bama on the road amirite?
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter