Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/2/12 at 12:24 am to Riseupfromtherubble
I'm not even butthurt about the game, it was a well played game. Like I said, it didn't really affect the outcome of the game. It was just unnecessary.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 12:25 am to five_fivesix
quote:
shoulder.
NO FLAG
You are dumb trash if you think this.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 12:26 am to dawg4lyfe
quote:
So unnecessary roughness for hitting a QB high is a made up penalty?
Seems legit. Can't wait for your next post.
YES. You are making up a penalty. There is NO rule that says you can't hit someone high.....even with your helmet if you are not using the crown of your helmet. There is one that protects QB's throwing the ball but.... You say QB like Murray was throwing the ball...he wasn't and as a result, Murray isn't classified as a "defenseless player"
So yes, you are trying to invent a penalty that doesn't exist.
This post was edited on 12/2/12 at 12:28 am
Posted on 12/2/12 at 12:26 am to FlukerFlakes
quote:
UGA player that tried to gouge Milliner's eyes out. And then Milliner was called for unsportmanslike.
Second guy/retaliation guy is the one that normally gets busted/gets the flag. Anyone that's ever played football knows this. Don't retaliate, just wait for the next opportunity to get him back.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 12:27 am to GeorgiaTide
quote:
But how would a ball that's that's tipped continue its path without the spiral being disrupted?
Yep.
quote:
I understand the rule.
Can you help me out on it? I have never seen the purpose. I don't see why it needs to be there. It often erases real PI on balls that stay fairly on course
quote:
It sure feels great to win though
Amen
Posted on 12/2/12 at 12:32 am to MrTide33
If a ball is tipped at the line any pass interference is negated. Purpose would be so PI wouldn't be called on a play where the ball shoots up in the air after a tip and both teams are trying to run under it. It also rewards the defense for making a play on the ball.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 12:36 am to GeorgiaTide
quote:
I understand the rule. But how would a ball that's that's tipped continue its path without the spiral being disrupted?
I forgot to add the other two you mentioned. FWIW I was watching the game with a Georgia fan that thought Georgia was getting more favorable calls as well.
It sure feels great to win though
oh really? which of Alabama's two penalties were more favorable calls? lol
Posted on 12/2/12 at 12:37 am to SofaKingTrill
Lacy's fumble and no call TD...may have been favorable. Sure looks like it to me from this image.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 12:38 am to UASports23
That should have been a Lacy TD.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 12:39 am to GeorgiaTide
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/2/12 at 12:40 am
Posted on 12/2/12 at 12:39 am to SofaKingTrill
The 5 or 6 penalties on Georgia that weren't called.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 12:50 am to GeorgiaTide
I see.. Maybe it should be more of a judgment call? Like the trajectory has to be seriously altered. Even Georgia's pass wasn't extremely altered
Posted on 12/2/12 at 12:58 am to MrTide33
That would leave too much of a margin for error on the call. A more fitting solution would be to require video evidence that the ball was tipped on the review for the interference to be called off.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 1:43 am to OBReb6
quote:
They have to suspend him, it not debatable. And if they don't, the SEC are even bigger hypocrites than previously believed, because they suspended trae elston earlier in the year.
This is the issue. Elston got suspended for a game even though a flag wasn't thrown for a hit that was deemed "unnecessary". If Elston deserved a suspension for that hit then Dial does for his. Period.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 1:45 am to RB10
quote:
This is the issue. Elston got suspended for a game even though a flag wasn't thrown for a hit that was deemed "unnecessary". If Elston deserved a suspension for that hit then Dial does for his. Period.
wrong.
Dial didn't hit a defenseless player. Elston DID.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 1:48 am to FlukerFlakes
quote:
Dial didn't hit a defenseless player. Elston DID.
LOL this is so ridiculous it's embarassing. Elston hit a receiver who was still making an attempt at the ball. That was a legit football play by a safety trying to make a play. Dial hit Murray who was obviously not involved in the play and blindsided him. Thats the definition of a dirty hit.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 1:49 am to GCTiger11
quote:mathieu never touched AJ. Mathieu grabbed Dre by his facemask and twisted it like the piece of shite he is. Different. And this was on an interception return and he is obviously leading with his shoulder. Dafuq?
Who gives a frick. It was unnecessary. Had Jarvis Jones done that to McCarron, the Bama fans would be calling for his head like they were for Mathieu last year.
I'll call our guys out but shite you pansies are reaching.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 1:49 am to RB10
quote:
Thats the definition of a dirty hit.
wrong.
it is not a penalty.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 1:53 am to FlukerFlakes
quote:
it is not a penalty
LINK
Here's a nice wide angle for you. Murray is 10 yards away from the play and not even making an attempt at the ball carrier. Not to mention he's already being tackled when the hit occurs. No matter how hard you Bama fans trying to spin this it was a dirty hit.
Page 11 of 27
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News