Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/26/13 at 1:27 pm to bbap
quote:
a tad better. yall at least were competing on the boards the chances i've gotten to watch.
Rebounds are not as important with this philosophy.
One day I will explain it in detail...
Mizzou fans were too damn dumb to understand it.
This post was edited on 11/26/13 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 11/26/13 at 1:28 pm to DaleDenton
you tried to yesterday. that's fine you believe that but you wont convince me. you got trounced on the boards yesterday and it's why you lost.
Posted on 11/26/13 at 1:29 pm to bbap
Need to make those and get the and 1. *shakeshead*
Posted on 11/26/13 at 1:29 pm to bbap
You can't give up OFF 20 boards like you did to Cal, but that isn't the sole reason why they lost.
Greater emphasis is placed on defending than rebounding position to some it up.
Greater emphasis is placed on defending than rebounding position to some it up.
This post was edited on 11/26/13 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 11/26/13 at 1:30 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
but that isn't the sole reason why they lost.
maybe not the sole reason but it was the biggest reason.
Posted on 11/26/13 at 1:33 pm to bbap
Its a rebound/turnover balance.
The net of rebounds and turnovers
Arkansas: 14 offensive minus 10 turnovers minus Cal's 29 defensive = -25
California: 19 offensive minus 18 turnovers minus Ark's 18 defensive = -17
Arkansas ended 36 Cal possessions with forced turnovers and defensive rebounds. The Bears offset this damage with 19 offensive rebounds, which is a big number given their rate of misses.
California ended 39 Arkansas possessions with forced turnovers and defensive rebounds. The Hogs countered with 14 offensive rebounds, which was a low number vs. the total chances.
Greater emphasis is placed on defending than going to the boards leading to possible easy buckets via threes, there should be better positioning for long rebounds if the players are doing what they should.
The net of rebounds and turnovers
Arkansas: 14 offensive minus 10 turnovers minus Cal's 29 defensive = -25
California: 19 offensive minus 18 turnovers minus Ark's 18 defensive = -17
Arkansas ended 36 Cal possessions with forced turnovers and defensive rebounds. The Bears offset this damage with 19 offensive rebounds, which is a big number given their rate of misses.
California ended 39 Arkansas possessions with forced turnovers and defensive rebounds. The Hogs countered with 14 offensive rebounds, which was a low number vs. the total chances.
Greater emphasis is placed on defending than going to the boards leading to possible easy buckets via threes, there should be better positioning for long rebounds if the players are doing what they should.
Posted on 11/26/13 at 1:35 pm to DaleDenton
Hogs look much more focused today
Posted on 11/26/13 at 1:36 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Arkansas crashing the boards early.
Posted on 11/26/13 at 1:38 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Its a rebound/turnover balance.
The net of rebounds and turnovers
Arkansas: 14 offensive minus 10 turnovers minus Cal's 29 defensive = -25
California: 19 offensive minus 18 turnovers minus Ark's 18 defensive = -17
Arkansas ended 36 Cal possessions with forced turnovers and defensive rebounds. The Bears offset this damage with 19 offensive rebounds, which is a big number given their rate of misses.
California ended 39 Arkansas possessions with forced turnovers and defensive rebounds. The Hogs countered with 14 offensive rebounds, which was a low number vs. the total chances.
Greater emphasis is placed on defending than going to the boards leading to possible easy buckets via threes, there should be better positioning for long rebounds if the players are doing what they should.
thats a whole lot of words to basically say you cant rebound but oh its ok thats our philosophy. i dont think anyone is buying it. sorry.
Posted on 11/26/13 at 1:42 pm to bbap
quote:
thats a whole lot of words to basically say you cant rebound but oh its ok thats our philosophy. i dont think anyone is buying it. sorry.
You could have just said, I don't under stand the game, only know what ESPN commentators tell me, and that is the only way.
Posted on 11/26/13 at 1:45 pm to bbap
damn he almost got smashed on by a white dude
Posted on 11/26/13 at 1:45 pm to DaleDenton
The more I watch games this season, the more I'm convinced Jordan Mickey is one of the best 5 freshmen this year.
Posted on 11/26/13 at 1:47 pm to vengeanceofrain
quote:
damn he almost got smashed on by a white dude
i dont know. looked to me like the white kid pulled it back because he knew he was about to get stuffed.
Posted on 11/26/13 at 1:48 pm to bbap
Terrible on-ball defense.
Posted on 11/26/13 at 1:48 pm to beebefootballfan
quote:
what a flop
meh. he traveled too before the charge.
Posted on 11/26/13 at 1:49 pm to bbap
quote:
thats a whole lot of words to basically say you cant rebound but oh its ok thats our philosophy. i dont think anyone is buying it. sorry.
To admit that rebounding is an important part of basketball will be to admit that Anderson isn't Jesus Christ. It's not happening. Not this year.
Posted on 11/26/13 at 1:49 pm to beebefootballfan
Been a while since I played and burned out on BB but when did it become an offensive foul when the defensive players feet aren't set? Did the rules change?
Page 21 of 31
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News