Started By
Message

FYI: The Full Text of the NCAA Rulebook Regarding Targeting
Posted on 7/23/13 at 8:36 pm
Posted on 7/23/13 at 8:36 pm
This is going to be the most controversial change to the NCAA rulebook in decades. Estimates based on the number of targeting calls last year show that a minimum of 110-120 players will be ejected under this rule this coming season. The SEC Rant will go crazy debating every potential targeting call this season so here is the full text of the NCAA rulebook so we can be informed about what it means to "target with the crown of the helmet" and what it means to "initiate contact to the head or neck of a defenseless player."
To summarize, 1. you cannot target any player with the crown of your helmet, regardless of whether you hit their head, and 2. you cannot initiate contact using any part of your body to the head or neck of a defenseless player.
The Rules:
To summarize, 1. you cannot target any player with the crown of your helmet, regardless of whether you hit their head, and 2. you cannot initiate contact using any part of your body to the head or neck of a defenseless player.
The Rules:
quote:
Targeting and Initiating Contact With the Crown of the Helmet
ARTICLE 3. No player shall target and initiate contact against an opponent
with the crown (top) of his helmet. When in question, it is a foul. (Rule 9-6)
(A.R. 9-1-3-I)
PENALTY—15 yards. For dead-ball fouls, 15 yards from the succeeding
spot. Automatic first down for fouls by Team B if not in conflict with other
rules.
For fouls in the first half: Disqualification for the remainder of the
game. For fouls in the second half: Disqualification for the remainder of
the game and the first half of the next game. If the foul occurs in the second
half of the last game of the season, players with remaining eligibility shall
serve the suspension during the first game of the following season. The
disqualification is subject to review by Instant Replay (Rule 12-3-5-f). [S38,
S24 and S47]
For games in which Instant Replay is not used: If a player is disqualified
in the second half, the conference may consult the national coordinator of
football officials who would then facilitate a video review. Based on the
review, if the national coordinator concludes that the player should not
have been disqualified, the conference may vacate the suspension. If the
national coordinator supports the disqualification, the suspension for the
next game will remain.
Targeting and Initiating Contact to Head or Neck Area of a
Defenseless Player
ARTICLE 4. No player shall target and initiate contact to the head or neck
area of a defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or
shoulder. When in question, it is a foul (Rules 2-27-14 and 9-6).
(A.R. 9-1-4-
I-VI)
PENALTY—15 yards. For dead-ball fouls, 15 yards from the succeeding
spot. Automatic first down for fouls by Team B if not in conflict with other
rules.
For fouls in the first half: Disqualification for the remainder of the
game. For fouls in the second half: Disqualification for the remainder of
the game and the first half of the next game. If the foul occurs in the second
half of the last game of the season, players with remaining eligibility shall
serve the suspension during the first game of the following season. The
disqualification is subject to review by Instant Replay (Rule 12-3-5-f). [S38,
S24 and S47]
For games in which Instant Replay is not used: If a player is disqualified
in the second half, the conference may consult the national coordinator of
football officials who would then facilitate a video review. Based on the
review, if the national coordinator concludes that the player should not
have been disqualified, the conference may vacate the suspension. If the
national coordinator supports the disqualification, the suspension for the
next game will remain.
Notes to 9-1-3 and 9-1-4
Note 1
: “Targeting” means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes
of attacking with an apparent intent that goes beyond making a legal tackle or
a legal block or playing the ball. Some indicators of targeting include but are
not limited to:
• Launch—a player leaving his feet to attack an opponent by an upward and
forward thrust of the body to make contact in the head or neck area
• A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with contact at
the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground
• Leading with helmet, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with contact at the
head or neck area
• Lowering the head before attacking by initiating contact with the crown of
the helmet
Note 2
: Defenseless player (Rule 2-27-14):
• A player in the act of or just after throwing a pass.
• A receiver attempting to catch a pass, or one who has completed a catch and
has not had time to protect himself or has not clearly become a ball carrier.
• A kicker in the act of or just after kicking a ball, or during the kick or the
return.
• A kick returner attempting to catch or recover a kick.
• A player on the ground.
• A player obviously out of the play.
• A player who receives a blind-side block.
• A ball carrier already in the grasp of an opponent and whose forward progress
has been stopped.
• A quarterback any time after a change of possession.
This post was edited on 7/23/13 at 10:03 pm
Posted on 7/23/13 at 8:53 pm to Monticello
How in hell are the refs gonna keep up with all of these new rules? There's gonna be a damn flag on every play.
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:01 pm to Monticello
So would this qualify as a flag and ejection? Tom Ritter still doesn't think so. Blatant piece of shite.
This post was edited on 7/23/13 at 9:03 pm
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:10 pm to Monticello
tl;dr
dial shoulda been ejected
dial shoulda been ejected
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:35 pm to Lsuhoohoo
quote:
So would this qualify as a flag and ejection?
Yes. 95 would be ejected for targeting with the helmet, even if it is not head to head.
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:39 pm to Monticello
Don't get me started on that game.
between that hit and the Peterson "non" interception, 2009 LSU @ Bama ranks right up there with 21-0 as a vomit inducing game.

Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:39 pm to Monticello
The most interesting part of your post is how I didn't read a single bit of it.
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:41 pm to Monticello
Great post. This is going to be a shite show. Also, LSU fans are going to derail this conversation with their lunacy.
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:42 pm to Monticello
quote:
A player who receives a blind-side block.
• A ball carrier already in the grasp of an opponent and whose forward progress
has been stopped.
So good bye for making a highlight reel blind side blocks on punt returns? Or cut backs and etc.
So when the RB has been grabbed and is still fighting you can't come in and clean up the tackle to hard? Sad faces
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:44 pm to Swoopin
quote:
The most interesting part of your post is how I didn't read a single bit of it.
Don't worry. 99% of the SEC Rant will not read the rules either. But then they will all bitch and cry every time targeting is, or is not called, and give lots of uninformed thoughts even though they have no idea what the rule is.
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:45 pm to spacewrangler
quote:
So good bye for making a highlight reel blind side blocks on punt returns?
If so LSU would have had guys ejected to hell and back for the hits they kept putting on that poor guy from State year after year.
This post was edited on 7/23/13 at 9:46 pm
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:45 pm to TT9
quote:
How in hell are the refs gonna keep up with all of these new rules? There's gonna be a damn flag on every play
If in doubt, throw em out.
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:46 pm to Monticello
The rules really don't apply because REC that's why
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:49 pm to DMagic
quote:
The rules really don't apply because REC that's why
oh now you dunit.
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:50 pm to Swoopin
quote:
The most interesting part of your post is how Auburn players can't read a single bit of it.
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:53 pm to spacewrangler
quote:
So good bye for making a highlight reel blind side blocks on punt returns? Or cut backs and etc.
You can still blind side block, but can't initiate the block with contact to the head or neck when you blind side block.
quote:
So when the RB has been grabbed and is still fighting you can't come in and clean up the tackle to hard? Sad faces
You can still come in and tackle him, but you can't have one player holding him up and then another come in and spear him with the helmet or initiate contact to his head or neck using any body part, including the shoulders.
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:57 pm to Alahunter
quote:
If in doubt, throw em out.
What is disturbing is that this is the actual NCAA policy specifically stated in the rule:
quote:
ARTICLE 3. No player shall target and initiate contact against an opponent with the crown (top) of his helmet. When in question, it is a foul.
The refs are taught to throw the flag if they think there is any possibility it was targeting. They can then review the ejection part, but the 15 yard penalty remains even if the review shows it was not targeting and the player is not ejected. So you get a penalty for an overturned call. How fricked up is that?
This post was edited on 7/23/13 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:58 pm to Dire Wolf
quote:
17. Vandy
54. Florida
63. Georgia
65. Texas A&M
77. Alabama
89. Auburn
97. Missouri
101. Tennessee
115. South Carolina
125. Kentucky
134. LSU
134. Arkansas
151. Ole Miss
160. Mississippi State
herp derp
ETA: 'Cello, I'm being a smartass. You should put [ quote ] around the actual rule excerpt because your comments summarizing it could stand out better

This post was edited on 7/23/13 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 7/23/13 at 10:09 pm to Monticello
So a LB tackling a RB puts the crown of his helmet into the RB's side - ejection?
This is f'd up.
This is f'd up.
Posted on 7/23/13 at 10:13 pm to Monticello
quote:
When in question, it is a foul.
This is the 'out' that is going to bring a lot of flags. Guys better go back to the old fashioned facemask to the numbers and wrap up technique.
Popular
Back to top
