Started By
Message
re: Fla won with their 2nd best pitcher against a guy with 14 innings on the year by 1
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:21 pm to KajunGator
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:21 pm to KajunGator
quote:
Dyson Horvath Kowar Rubio I think we will be ok in the pitching department
Dyson
Kowar
Horvath
Rubio
Not confident at all with Horvath or Rubio on the mound.
0
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:21 pm to Wild Thang
Florida won by 1 starting their 2nd best pitcher against a guy that's got 14 innings of pitching on the year.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:23 pm to Box Geauxrilla
quote:
The "against a guy with 14 innings on the year" is a side note, so it gets wrapped by commas.
Wrong.
It's a complete statement, therefore it doesn't require any commas.
He is missing a period though.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:27 pm to Jorts R Us
quote:
Florida won by 1 starting their 2nd best pitcher against a guy that's got 14 innings of pitching on the year.
Ok. But how,minus my first missed comma, was it so horrible?
Think I nailed the commas there lmao.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:29 pm to magildachunks
quote:
Wrong.
It's a complete statement, therefore it doesn't require any commas.
quote:
He is missing a period though.
FML
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:39 pm to magildachunks
I do have a legit gripe on the missing period. Who actually places one in the title?
I actually enjoy this convo.
I took too many English classes for me not to write correctly.
I actually enjoy this convo.
I took too many English classes for me not to write correctly.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:40 pm to magildachunks
quote:
It's a complete statement, therefore it doesn't require any commas.
I maybe wrong here, and I'm cool if I am, but I think it needs commas because you can pull that prep phrase out of the sentence and it's still a complete thought. It would then be:
"Florida won with their second best pitcher by one"
The "against a guy..." is just a preposition phrase and should be surrounded by commas.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:50 pm to Box Geauxrilla
I actually think the comma should be before 'against', yet I still think the 'by 1' is fine. JMO
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:52 pm to Wild Thang
Ok jeez lol..it your title wasn't that bad. Is that what you want to hear?
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:55 pm to ShreveportTiger1987
I'll stick up for him. It wasn't bad at all, and conveyed the message easily. I certainly didn't understand the hate for it. Especially by message board standards.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:58 pm to ShreveportTiger1987
Well, it was called horrible English, so I happen to take issue.
If the argument is a preposition, and the use of commas, then I take offense to the description of 'horrible'.
We are now talking detailed issues, when usually misspelling 'their/there' calls into the word 'horrible' regarding English.
So whatevs #letitgo lol
If the argument is a preposition, and the use of commas, then I take offense to the description of 'horrible'.
We are now talking detailed issues, when usually misspelling 'their/there' calls into the word 'horrible' regarding English.
So whatevs #letitgo lol
Posted on 6/27/17 at 5:12 am to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
So, Florida won the game is what you're saying?
And no mention of refs anywhere. That's gotta be a first.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 7:09 pm to geauxcoco
quote:
You dont want to face these guys with our backs against the wall...and the cws on the line. Don't expect the same results baw. Just sayin.
Batter up!
Posted on 6/27/17 at 10:30 pm to cajunbama
Did they use their best pitcher tonight? 
Posted on 6/27/17 at 10:33 pm to cajunbama
quote:
Did they use their best pitcher tonight?
No.
Which is why the phrase 'on paper' was used.
But bump if you like.
I've only given congrats to Florida.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News