Started By
Message
Posted on 10/15/16 at 9:23 am to CapstoneGrad06
maybe clemson will get another shot at SEC's one team this year. our special teams and and in my view, secondary are both better this year. i wish bama still had that qb from last year b/c other then those bombs to the tight end, he wasn't that good. like clemson's chances facing him again
This post was edited on 10/15/16 at 9:24 am
Posted on 10/15/16 at 9:24 am to Tillman
Don't be obtuse. You know what I'm getting at.
Frank Howard
Hootie Ingram
Charlie Pell
Danny Ford
Tommy Bowden
Dabo Swinney
That's a lot of former Alabama players and assistants to serve as head coach at Clemson.
Frank Howard
Hootie Ingram
Charlie Pell
Danny Ford
Tommy Bowden
Dabo Swinney
That's a lot of former Alabama players and assistants to serve as head coach at Clemson.
Posted on 10/15/16 at 9:24 am to Tillman
You struggled to beat Troy and Auburn. You don't want the real thing.
Posted on 10/15/16 at 9:25 am to CapstoneGrad06
none of them play on the field though. in recent years u would have to credit Watson and Boyd as much as anybody. one from virginia, one from georgia
This post was edited on 10/15/16 at 9:25 am
Posted on 10/15/16 at 9:25 am to Tillman
Are you a god damn idiot or major troll?
Posted on 10/15/16 at 9:26 am to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
You struggled to beat Troy and Auburn. You don't want the real thing
those were first two games of season and Clemson despite 'struggling' scored 30 on troy, who is 4-1 and most likely wins their conference.
This post was edited on 10/15/16 at 9:27 am
Posted on 10/15/16 at 9:27 am to Tillman
I can summarize your posts in this thread with one word:
Excuses
Excuses
Posted on 10/15/16 at 9:27 am to Tillman
quote:
You struggled to beat Troy and Auburn. You don't want the real thing
those were first two games of season and Clemson despite 'struggling' scored 30 on troy, who is 4-1 and most likely wins their conference.
This post was edited on 10/15 at 9:27 am
Did you just say that
You struggled to beat Troy and Auburn. You don't want the real thing
those were first two games of season and Clemson despite 'struggling' scored 30 on troy, who is 4-1 and most likely wins their conference.
This post was edited on 10/15 at 9:27 am
Did you just say that
This post was edited on 10/15/16 at 9:28 am
Posted on 10/15/16 at 9:28 am to VVega
wut excuse have i made. lol i saw plenty of excuses when bama lost to a mediocre ole miss team at home last year, 2nd year in row they lost to ole miss
Posted on 10/15/16 at 9:28 am to VVega
That is correct, that's all they have. They didn't play a complete game which, includes special teams. It was a huge glaring issue they had and Bama exploited it.
Posted on 10/15/16 at 9:29 am to TheTideMustRoll
Yes, frick those hillbilly, low down, pumpkin puke Orange, no good, snitches. I can't stress this enough, frick Tennessee!
Posted on 10/15/16 at 9:29 am to CrimsonBoz
so we are agreeing with each other, Clemson wins if not historically bad on special teams which is what i said. it is not an excuse, it is a factual obseravvtion lol
if i was doing an excuse, i would point out boelware, shaq lawson and mckensie alexandar were all hurt in the bama game. clemson also had a much tougher opponent in first round, and should have gotten Michigan state but Alabama/SEC bias got them MSU.
if i was doing an excuse, i would point out boelware, shaq lawson and mckensie alexandar were all hurt in the bama game. clemson also had a much tougher opponent in first round, and should have gotten Michigan state but Alabama/SEC bias got them MSU.
This post was edited on 10/15/16 at 9:31 am
Posted on 10/15/16 at 9:30 am to Tillman
What does us playing Ole Miss have to do with us beating you for the natty? I'll help, nothing. You lost. You can what if it to death but you lost to a better team. Sorry.
Posted on 10/15/16 at 9:31 am to Tillman
I am telling you one area you lost in, special teams. You also lost on some coverage in secondary , and some DL issues at times. So it wasn't just your special teams that lost you the game.
This post was edited on 10/15/16 at 9:32 am
Posted on 10/15/16 at 9:31 am to CrimsonBoz
many sports experts said after the game they thought Clemson would beat alabama like 8 out of 10 times.
if you look at bama's scehdule last year, they didn't really play anybody. ole miss was their best regular season opponent and they lost the game at home. they then get the team that should have been the 4 seed and Clemson's opponent in the first round, while Clemson gets the Olklahoma team that many thought was the best team in country at that point.
if you look at bama's scehdule last year, they didn't really play anybody. ole miss was their best regular season opponent and they lost the game at home. they then get the team that should have been the 4 seed and Clemson's opponent in the first round, while Clemson gets the Olklahoma team that many thought was the best team in country at that point.
This post was edited on 10/15/16 at 9:33 am
Posted on 10/15/16 at 9:32 am to CrimsonBoz
It's the old Al Bundy Bulldog approach. Act like a bafoon while trolling.
Posted on 10/15/16 at 9:33 am to Tillman
Too bad we only play it once. You have one chance to get it right.
Posted on 10/15/16 at 9:33 am to CrimsonBoz
lol who knew?
if our 3 stars on defense were healthy, i think it different story.
i can live with 14-1 lol most title teams in the past only had 12 wins, some of them only 11
if our 3 stars on defense were healthy, i think it different story.
i can live with 14-1 lol most title teams in the past only had 12 wins, some of them only 11
This post was edited on 10/15/16 at 9:35 am
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News