Started By
Message
re: (Final Draft) Evidence Mounts of a Scandal in the SEC
Posted on 7/26/13 at 2:46 pm to sarc
Posted on 7/26/13 at 2:46 pm to sarc
Am is delusional. , Saban with a week off and half the offseason to prepare. 35-10. Bama! Maybe?
I did however go back through Bama schedule through 2008, and the earliest bye was week 5. In the year with 2 byes like this year , the first bye was week 6.
I'm sorry, maybe it is all coincidental, but if it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's probably not a cow!
I did however go back through Bama schedule through 2008, and the earliest bye was week 5. In the year with 2 byes like this year , the first bye was week 6.
I'm sorry, maybe it is all coincidental, but if it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's probably not a cow!
2
Posted on 7/26/13 at 2:47 pm to 3rddownonthe8
No, you're right. The SEC has conspired with Bama to give them the easiest possible schedule.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 2:53 pm to TreyAnastasio
I'm not calling it a conspiracy, I just think if you have people making decisions, with allegiances in place , it is difficult to put those aside. I think if Bama fans would just come forward and say yeah we got an easy schedule, and not just continually defend it. This would go away.
Because the fact is you got a great schedule to run the table, and it wasn't based an prior scheduling or future scheduling or luck of the draw, you were given a great schedule. It's just fact.
Because the fact is you got a great schedule to run the table, and it wasn't based an prior scheduling or future scheduling or luck of the draw, you were given a great schedule. It's just fact.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 2:55 pm to 3rddownonthe8
quote:
I just think if you have people making decisions, with allegiances in place
The SEC ADs?
quote:
I think if Bama fans would just come forward and say yeah we got an easy schedule,
We have been for months
quote:
his would go away.
Have you met the LSU fans on this board?
quote:
Because the fact is you got a great schedule to run the table, and it wasn't based an prior scheduling or future scheduling or luck of the draw, you were given a great schedule. It's just fact.
AS was UGA
This post was edited on 7/26/13 at 2:56 pm
Posted on 7/26/13 at 3:01 pm to TreyAnastasio
Has A UGA fan ever said the last 2 years were not great schedules? Show me. I haven't , we got great schedules. The first year was old rotation, and one of the games was against the defending Champ. Last year was easy , just because . And we didn't take advantage. Your schedule come out of no where, you are blind if you don't think so.
And the ADs do approve schedule , but don't create them. If they were to make a big deal, wouldn't that cause some issues?
And the ADs do approve schedule , but don't create them. If they were to make a big deal, wouldn't that cause some issues?
This post was edited on 7/26/13 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 7/26/13 at 3:03 pm to 3rddownonthe8
Also Slive runs it, they pretty much do what he says. I've never heard on AD complain about the SEC offices, why is that you think? Cause Slive runs the show and let's his guys do what they want.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 3:04 pm to 3rddownonthe8
quote:
I did however go back through Bama schedule through 2008, and the earliest bye was week 5. In the year with 2 byes like this year , the first bye was week 6.
Again, I don't think you understand how bye scheduling works. One factor is the Conference schedule that comes from the SEC. The other factor is when each school chooses to schedule OOC games. So, going back to 2008, how many years did Bama have a conference game scheduled in Week 2? 0. So Bama could've had a week 2 bye each of those seasons if that's what they wanted.
This post was edited on 7/26/13 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 7/26/13 at 3:06 pm to sarc
Why was AM moved to week 3 from back half of the season like last year?
Posted on 7/26/13 at 3:10 pm to 3rddownonthe8
Maybe the SEC office got tired of Arky complaining about having to play Bama early in the year.
Maybe they didn't want A&M to have to play LSU and Bama back to back.
Maybe they wanted LSU, Bama, and A&M to all have the option of scheduling byes before playing each other
Maybe they didn't want A&M to have to play LSU and Bama back to back.
Maybe they wanted LSU, Bama, and A&M to all have the option of scheduling byes before playing each other
This post was edited on 7/26/13 at 3:15 pm
Posted on 7/26/13 at 3:13 pm to sarc
Ok
Posted on 7/26/13 at 3:15 pm to tickfawtiger
quote:
tickfawtiger
Holy shite you're dumb.
RA'd thread for an anchor.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 3:17 pm to McManus
Understatement of the Year: TL;DR
Can somebody please explain to me why this conspiracy shite didn't happen when Bama sucked?
Can somebody please explain to me why this conspiracy shite didn't happen when Bama sucked?
Posted on 7/26/13 at 4:06 pm to PrivatePublic
Well first of all those schedules were locked in a long time with rotation home and home then off. Other than placement in schedule , there wasn't much to do. And just because the previous regime wasn't playing games, doesn't mean this one isn't.
All they had to go was give schedule Bama UGA and LSU UK and nothing would have been said.
All they had to go was give schedule Bama UGA and LSU UK and nothing would have been said.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 4:07 pm to tickfawtiger
quote:
The "unbiased" SEC schedulers CHANGED the A&M vs. Bama game from late in the season and just AFTER the LSU game, to an earlier date to AVOID back/back difficult opponents like last year
Where do you guys come up with this shite? Does someone just say this over on tiger rant and y'all take it as gospel? It's funny that y'all resort to making shite up to further your conspiracies.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 4:09 pm to McManus
quote:
McManus
BlueTuna?!?! is that you?
Posted on 7/26/13 at 4:09 pm to 3rddownonthe8
quote:
Why was AM moved to week 3 from back half of the season like last year?
It wasn't moved, its always been that time. It's just another made up fact to further the delusions.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 4:10 pm to PrivatePublic
quote:This question is the silver bullet. The stake to the heart of the nutcases. Thank you, my friend.
Can somebody please explain to me why this conspiracy shite didn't happen when Bama sucked?
Posted on 7/26/13 at 4:11 pm to 3rddownonthe8
quote:
Well first of all those schedules were locked in a long time with rotation home and home then off. Other than placement in schedule , there wasn't much to do. And just because the previous regime wasn't playing games, doesn't mean this one isn't. All they had to go was give schedule Bama UGA and LSU UK and nothing would have been said.
Does not follow the premise they did with everyone else.. It actually is fairly logical and the op and most fail to see. They would rather let the conspiracy show through.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 4:15 pm to NYCAuburn
Posted on 7/26/13 at 4:15 pm to JuiceTerry
No the silver bullet is why everyone questions the schedule except the Bama fans. Fans , coaches, media, other conferences ... What is more likely the fans drinking crimson kool aid. Or the rest of the college football world?
Page 11 of 14
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News