Started By
Message
re: ESPN's early 2013 SEC rankings
Posted on 1/8/13 at 2:36 pm to tiggerthetooth
Posted on 1/8/13 at 2:36 pm to tiggerthetooth
quote:
Why does anyone care about who the last 4 teams in the SEC are? They all suck, THE END.
Only an arky poster would say "I would put us at 10th" in a 14 team ranking.
0
Posted on 1/8/13 at 2:51 pm to inelishaitrust
seems spot on with the exception of vandy and UF being a little high, imo...
Posted on 1/8/13 at 3:14 pm to Crockett
I would love to see one of these analysts put Vandy above someone in the Big 6 just to see the shite storm that would make 
But Vandy definitely has the potential for 7th. It has a pretty high ceiling with the talent we are bringing in, but our floor is equally as low. Should be a roller coaster of a season. We'll know after the first game of the season what to expect.
But Vandy definitely has the potential for 7th. It has a pretty high ceiling with the talent we are bringing in, but our floor is equally as low. Should be a roller coaster of a season. We'll know after the first game of the season what to expect.
Posted on 1/8/13 at 3:18 pm to X
quote:
7. Vanderbilt: The Commodores have made enough strides under James Franklin that they’ll have to deal with some real expectations in 2013. They finished No. 23 in the final Associated Press poll and bring back a lot of their key players. Receiver Jordan Matthews’ decision to stay in school was a coup for the Commodores. The quarterback battle will be worth watching with Jordan Rodgers graduating, and the defense is in excellent hands with Bob Shoop at the helm.
8. Ole Miss: Did anybody see coming what Hugh Freeze did with Ole Miss’ program in his first season? The Rebels managed seven wins and did it with freshmen and first-year players lining up all over the field. Freeze is also recruiting like gangbusters, so there’s more help on the way. Donte Moncrief is an explosive receiving threat, and if quarterback Bo Wallace can cut down on his turnovers, the Rebels should be even better on offense.
Well, fortunately we're getting this out of the way and hopefully proving him wrong. Good rankings for the most part though.
Posted on 1/8/13 at 3:28 pm to OMLandshark
[quote] (We were better than they were this year and bring back more next year) [/quote}\]
More Ole Miss sour grapes. We beat them in their house and they are poor sports about it. They don't want to give the victor any credit at all. This, I am afraid, is what this message board has become all about.
But regarding next year, don't get your hopes up that Vanderbilt will be deficient at quarterback or any other position. If you win, you will have to earn it. And I am sure the same applies to us.
More Ole Miss sour grapes. We beat them in their house and they are poor sports about it. They don't want to give the victor any credit at all. This, I am afraid, is what this message board has become all about.
But regarding next year, don't get your hopes up that Vanderbilt will be deficient at quarterback or any other position. If you win, you will have to earn it. And I am sure the same applies to us.
Posted on 1/8/13 at 3:33 pm to Prominentwon
quote:
I know you guys have seen Anchorman.
I'm Vince Vaughan at the top of the ladder in the bear cave scene
I haven't. Is Vince Vaughan mad in that scene?
Posted on 1/8/13 at 3:36 pm to X
I'm fine with this list. Top 3 in the east is going to be a jumble again.
South Carolina has the easiest schedule, so I'll take them as east winners. Florida needs one more season to fully repair the shite storm on the offensive side of the ball. The defense should still be pretty good though.
Georgia has the best offense, but not sure how good the defense will be losing all of those starters.
South Carolina has the easiest schedule, so I'll take them as east winners. Florida needs one more season to fully repair the shite storm on the offensive side of the ball. The defense should still be pretty good though.
Georgia has the best offense, but not sure how good the defense will be losing all of those starters.
Posted on 1/8/13 at 3:37 pm to X
Alabama loses 11 starters and LSU loses 8.
Posted on 1/8/13 at 3:41 pm to Gladius Veritas
what's not to understand?
quote:
Auburn goes 3-9, 0-8 in the SEC, loses to Arkansas 24-7, Arkansas hires a better coach and an equal/better coaching staff, so Auburn is 3 spots ahead of Arkansas?
Posted on 1/8/13 at 4:03 pm to vol017
quote:
A 4-8 team losing the ony two players worth mentioning?
So a 3-9 team losing Blake, McCalleb, lutz and lemonier is better?
Posted on 1/8/13 at 4:04 pm to gohogs141
That's more like it, Arky and Auburn mixing it up. Equals if you may.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News