re: ESPN Twitter SEC vs Pac 10 - Interesting

Good thing for us Uab's offense is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than LSU's.

It's not like we lost to UAB though. I seem to remember LSU doing that not to long ago.

The PAC10 is finally putting up some competition to USC. The SEC will send 6 to 8 teams to Bowl Games and win most of them. I'll have to wait and see what the PAC10 does this year. They are off to a good start so far.

I'm not saying we're as good as those top teams, but USC is the only PAC-10 team that might be able to stop us from pounding the ball. Oregon would beat us but we would have the ball so long, they wouldn't be able to pull a Tennessee.

The problem Oregon will run into is that their speed around the edge is exactly what the SEC is built to stop. Add no defense to that equation and you have real problems. Stanford is the PAC-10s best team and i don't see them beating florida or alabama. Don't think because Georgia is 1-3 they are a bad team. they lost to Arkansas(who had alabama on the ropes), They lost to an improved state team who is going to prove they are a solid team by the end of the year. Plus once green is back then the Georgia offense will have some life in it.

You give Georgia AJ Green and don't take away those two touchdowns and we lose that game.

quote:

---

remember when they could destroy every team in the SEC last year?

---

link? I never said such things. I said they could hang with the top teams and would beat the others more times than not.

quote:

---

Every time Oregon has a win, you go off about how fricking great they are...

---

Link to me going off on any win this year?
I never said they were great, they have issues on the D line and physical teams can beat them....especially the good ones. I did think they would beat OSU but I don't believe I said they would kill them.

Also, I don't believe I am pimping them here at all.

eta...it is obvious you have a problem with me, do us both a favor and don't respond to me. You don't see me responding to you out of nowhere. There is a reason for that. I would love to say more but I value my abilities to post on this site much more than telling a little sissy off who can't handle others opinions.

quote:

---

Florida seems to have done well, they do however have much better recruits but I don't think it is impossible for them to play with most of the teams in the SEC.

---

florida has so much more speed than oregon. The offense will work in the SEC its just that florida has focused on speed, speed and a little more speed.

quote:

---

They need D-tackles bad but the good thing about them is they provide turnovers for the offense. That is their main focus. They don't get the recruits yet to do what the top SEC teams do. They would kill for half of LSU's talent.

---

Weakness on the Lines is almost a guarantee that you will have trouble in the SEC. It means i'll extend my prediction to go ahead and say Arkansas could beat them as well

I don't care what Van Pelt says. There's no way in hell Stanford beats Florida on a neutral field. Also, I saw Oregon play on Saturday night and I'm not impressed at all with their defense. Arizona State was moving the ball up and down the field all night but kept turning the ball over at the worst possible times. Arizona State is a pretty solid team and I have no idea what to think about UCLA. The rest of the conference is either vastly overrated (USC, Arizona, Oregon State) or not good at all (Washington, Washington State, Cal). I'm just not very impressed with that conference.