Started By
Message
re: ESPN Report - Auburn & synthetic Marijuana (Spice)
Posted on 4/4/13 at 6:21 pm to PepaSpray
Posted on 4/4/13 at 6:21 pm to PepaSpray
quote:
But what is with all the brow-beating and the hush money payouts? Why all the legal counsel? Why all the scandals with players and their grades at AU?
vast media conspiracy.
we haven't seen anything like this since the GOP was out to get clinton in the 90's.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 6:32 pm to CaptChaos
quote:
CaptChaos
HAHAHAHA. That is funny.

Posted on 4/4/13 at 6:51 pm to diddydirtyAubie
quote:
diddydirtyAubie
ESPN Report - Auburn & synthetic Marijuana (Spice)
are parents even allowed to know that you failed a drug test if you're over 18? HIPPA laws?
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act???

I think you mean FERPA...the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. And the answer to your question is almost certainly yes.
"FERPA also permits a school to disclose personally identifiable information from education records of an "eligible student" (a student age 18 or older or enrolled in a postsecondary institution at any age) to his or her parents if the student is a 'dependent student' as that term is defined in Section 152 of the Internal Revenue Code. Generally, if either parent has claimed the student as a dependent on the parent's most recent income tax statement, the school may non-consensually disclose the student's education records to both parent."
FERPA
This post was edited on 4/4/13 at 6:57 pm
Posted on 4/4/13 at 6:59 pm to Bham4Tide
Honey badger would have eligible at Auburn.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 7:00 pm to Bham4Tide
quote:
The first of the Tigers to come to trial, Antonio Goodwin, was convicted in June 2012, and sentenced to 15 years in prison. At his trial, Dyer, who lent the players a gun allegedly used in the crime, admitted to chronically smoking synthetic marijuana. In a jailhouse interview with ESPN, Goodwin estimated that "half the team probably smoked spice."
This is why we can't have nice things.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 7:02 pm to BrerTiger
I'm starting to think the defense attorneys for these guys are setting this all up for the trials. Trying to make the robbery look like someone else's fault.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 7:02 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:You seem really smart. Is there any privacy provision in that act that he might be referencing?
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act???
Eta: fwiw, I think ferpa is more applicable and that auburn wouldn't be a covered entity under hipaa, but it isn't a laughable assertion.
This post was edited on 4/4/13 at 7:09 pm
Posted on 4/4/13 at 7:07 pm to WDE24
quote:
WDE24
The law shite just got real

Posted on 4/4/13 at 7:10 pm to WDE24
quote:
WDE24
ESPN Report - Auburn & synthetic Marijuana (Spice)
quote:
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act???
You seem really smart. Is there any privacy provision in that act that he might be referencin
Maybe, maybe not, but you seem like a bright guy, so you tell me...was his question about retaining health insurance when someone changes or loses a job, or a family's right of privacy related to a child's educational records?
Posted on 4/4/13 at 7:12 pm to Smoke7024
quote:
I'm starting to think the defense attorneys for these guys are setting this all up for the trials. Trying to make the robbery look like someone else's fault.
Yup.
The defense attorneys are looking to blame Auburn for the personal failings of these young men.
While I'm sure there's some truth to Auburn being at fault for not doing enough to monitor or enforce, it always makes it that much more difficult for the NCAA to prove anything when you've got "witnesses" with serious credibility issues. Emmert admitted as much today.
Personally, I hope the truth comes out -- good, bad and ugly. But realistically I wouldn't count on it.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 7:13 pm to BamaGradinTn
Hipaa has a privacy clause that prevents the disclosure of medical information that has nothing to do with insurance when changing jobs and his question was perfectly legitimate.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 7:21 pm to WDE24
quote:
WDE24
ESPN Report - Auburn & synthetic Marijuana (Spice)
Hipaa has a privacy clause that prevents the disclosure of medical information that has nothing to do with insurance when changing jobs and his question was perfectly legitimate.
Of course it was...because at Auburn football players are paid employees.

But seriously, his question had nothing to do with health information. It was about disciplinary records of a student and a parent's right to know.
This post was edited on 4/4/13 at 7:25 pm
Posted on 4/4/13 at 7:22 pm to BamaGradinTn
You really know nothing about hipaa do you? You are embarrassing yourself here.
Being an employee has nothing to do with anything.
Being an employee has nothing to do with anything.
This post was edited on 4/4/13 at 7:24 pm
Posted on 4/4/13 at 7:39 pm to WDE24
quote:
WDE24
ESPN Report - Auburn & synthetic Marijuana (Spice)
You really know nothing about hipaa do you? You are embarrassing yourself here.
Being an employee has nothing to do with anything.
Look, fool, even you should have enough brain cells to read the law and see that it has nothing to do with parents having access to their children's school disciplinary records.
Jesus, are you really this stupid?
Who's covered under HIPAA.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 7:45 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
Look, fool, even you should have enough brain cells to read the law and see that it has nothing to do with parents having access to their children's school disciplinary records.
Jesus, are you really this stupid?
Who's covered under HIPAA.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 7:46 pm to BamaGradinTn
Nice crawfish.
hipaa protects against the release of private medical information from certain covered entities. A drug test is medical information, not disciplinarian. I said in my first post that hipaa didn't apply, but that it wasn't a laughable question. You thought it was funny because you read the title of hipaa and thought it was only about insurance portability.
hipaa protects against the release of private medical information from certain covered entities. A drug test is medical information, not disciplinarian. I said in my first post that hipaa didn't apply, but that it wasn't a laughable question. You thought it was funny because you read the title of hipaa and thought it was only about insurance portability.
This post was edited on 4/4/13 at 7:50 pm
Posted on 4/4/13 at 7:47 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Wasn't illegal or against NCAA rules at the time if I am not mistaken.
Taking the old "steroids weren't illegal in MLB" stance I see
Posted on 4/4/13 at 7:49 pm to wartiger2004
quote:
Is this not what the LSU players were busted with the week of the AU LSU game in 2011?
LSU players were suspended, Auburn players were shown the red carpet
Popular
Back to top
