Started By
Message
re: ESPN: Did the SEC force them to turn-around their anti-Jesus stance?
Posted on 12/17/13 at 5:54 pm to scrooster
Posted on 12/17/13 at 5:54 pm to scrooster
ESPN should be able to run whatever they want. And when they do or don't I won't really care. Not everyone who loves SEC football, lives in the south and might even lean to the right politically gives a toss about religion.
Posted on 12/17/13 at 5:56 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
The problem is the diatribe the OP made, and his Whiskey Bent level of overthinking. Just no religious stuff at all. We need to train people to just turn off their Jesus brains when they log in.
Damn you to hell ... DAMN YOU TO HELL!!!
And that's "Mr. scrooster" to you.
Posted on 12/17/13 at 6:06 pm to scrooster
quote:
Damn you to hell ... DAMN YOU TO HELL!!!
And that's "Mr. scrooster" to you.
Sorry, Mr. Scrooster. Won't make that mistake again. I apologize.
Posted on 12/17/13 at 6:44 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
The problem is the diatribe the OP made, and his Whiskey Bent level of overthinking. Just no religious stuff at all. We need to train people to just turn off their Jesus brains when they log in.
Wishful thinkin man
Posted on 12/17/13 at 6:52 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Sorry, Mr. Scrooster. Won't make that mistake again. I apologize.
Accepted.
You temporarily disrupted my hypothalamus ... that was close.
Posted on 12/17/13 at 7:43 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Also, most of the deep south is probably anti-Catholic(I know quite a few who are VERY anti-Catholic), so I find this aspect of it comical.
Count me in that number
Catlicks are the worst thing to ever happen to mankind
Posted on 12/17/13 at 7:55 pm to Lacour
quote:
Catlicks are the worst thing to ever happen to mankind
Third worst ... and even then it's debatable.
Catholics vote liberal progressive ... so yeah, I can see why you'd type something like that though.
But ESPN is in the northeast where it is predominantly Catholic and predominantly liberal progressive ... yet they insulted the hell out of Notre Dame and Touchdown Jesus with that bimbo got up drunk roasting Mike and Mike ... what was her name? Dana Jacobson maybe? Yeah, hold on ... here you go. She was chugging vodka at the podium and f-bombing Jesus and Notre Dame. She was booed off the stage by the Southerners in the crowd ... along with the Domers and BCers of course.
Posted on 12/17/13 at 8:46 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
In Biblical Christianity, the god-man Jesus motivated by love died as a criminal by crucifixion as a propitiation for man's sins to a perfectly holy God. This is the very cornerstone of Christianity. It is anathema to Islam.
I realize that some consider this foreign to this board. However, it was the sports network that spawned the religious discussion.
In Qur'anical Islam... Jesus appears in 93 verses. His birth is still virginal, his message still one of peace and he still performed miracles. He is not crucified, but called to heaven by god. He was still the messiah, but a prophet who lead the way for Muhammad. They also believe that Jesus will return on Judgement Day to smite the Anti-Christ.
It's all BS... Islam diminishes the importance of Jesus in favor of their anointed holy mouthpiece of Allah in the same way that Judaic prophets and teachings are shoved to the rear when Jesus comes a preaching about God. In the end all three are praying to the same bearded guy and then throwing stones at their fellow worshipers. It's this kind of nonsense that makes me shake my head.
Posted on 12/17/13 at 8:53 pm to scrooster
The very idea of rabid "Christians" being persecuted is hilarious. I understand why you want to believe it - you want to be "persecuted for His name's sake". But this isn't grounded in reality. There is no similarity at all between being stoned for believing in Jesus and being dismissed by people who have no patience for your desire to equate Jesus with intolerant social viewpoints.
Posted on 12/17/13 at 9:11 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
The very idea of rabid "Christians" being persecuted is hilarious. I understand why you want to believe it - you want to be "persecuted for His name's sake". But this isn't grounded in reality. There is no similarity at all between being stoned for believing in Jesus and being dismissed by people who have no patience for your desire to equate Jesus with intolerant social viewpoints.
Posted on 12/17/13 at 10:04 pm to 02AGGIE
quote:
you too dip shite
frick you arse wipe.
BTW, did notice how I did that while employing the use of proper grammar?
Posted on 12/17/13 at 10:42 pm to Loathor
quote:
Islam diminishes the importance of Jesus in favor of their anointed holy mouthpiece of Allah in the same way that Judaic prophets and teachings are shoved to the rear when Jesus comes a preaching about God. In the end all three are praying to the same bearded guy and then throwing stones at their fellow worshipers. It's this kind of nonsense that makes me shake my head.
FTR, Jesus did not diminish the Old Testament prophets. I'll be glad to continue the discussion (unless the Admin goes all ESPN on me) but I have no idea who the three or the bearded guy are that you're referring to.
As for the OP, when something comes to the ESPN desk with Jesus' name on it, why are the compelled to cover it up?
Posted on 12/18/13 at 1:07 am to AlwysATgr
You are correct. In reality, Jesus validated the Old Testament prophets. His death and resurrection just invalidated Old Testament law.
Posted on 12/18/13 at 6:20 am to Dick Leverage
I don't agree with the new left these days, but ESPN should be able to run whatever they want too. That's real freedom if you want the truth, but we sorta live under the illusion of real freedom. I dislike the two party system, but when it comes to trying to tell others how to live their lifes. The left takes top prize these days. Each party has their nut jobs, but it's reached the top of the food chain within the left. Both parties usually lose control the longer they're in power though. Many Humans just can't handle the power the USA goverment welds.
Posted on 12/18/13 at 6:42 am to scrooster
quote:The SEC is not a religious organization. It is an athletic organization composed almost entirely of public universities (Vanderbilt is the exception). The SEC has absolutely zero business influencing ESPN on any sort of religious matter.
ETA: ESPN now represents the SEC in some regard ... and they need to remember who we are as a whole. If they are going to rep us, their policies need to take into consideration our outlooks and views moreso than the northeast's on all matters where OUR network is concerned IMHO.
That's the SEC as an organization.
If SEC fans want to call ESPN, then whatever. That's individuals acting as individuals and they have every right to protest/boycott if they want.
edit: personally I don't have a problem with the ad. I'm not religious, but the ad says "here at (wherever) we celebrate the birth of Jesus" so they are clearly talking about themselves and their organization's perspective. They aren't really pushing religion in the commercial and there is nothing that would imply ESPN agrees with their message.
This post was edited on 12/18/13 at 6:46 am
Posted on 12/18/13 at 7:32 am to sugatowng
quote:
This country was founded on Christian principles...It's sad the world leader in sports is too scared to run a Jesus add
This country was not founded on christian principles. The founding fathers were mostly agnostic. This country was founded on the principle that people could worship (or not) as they wish. The whole "in god we trust" was added to currency in 1957 not 1777.
Popular
Back to top


0







