Started By
Message

re: Does the SEC want the Sooners?

Posted on 6/25/15 at 2:18 pm to
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
59125 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 2:18 pm to
I would love it, take em in the West and move AU to the East. kick Mizzou out
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34688 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

I would love it, take em in the West and move AU to the East. kick Mizzou out



The state of Missouri has almost twice the population of the state of Oklahoma.
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
28075 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

OU has been marginalized as frick since A&M and MIZZOU left. Their bread and butter doesn't work anymore. Their whole program DEPENDS on at least A&M being unable to recruit top talent in Texas.


It's not just TAMU. The fact that Baylor and now TCU are really good and pulling in several 4 star recruits, in addition to TAMU and LSU swiping up top recruits in Texas, is really crippling them. These Texas kids have many more options now than just that rust bucket in Oklahoma.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
58899 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

The state of Missouri has almost twice the population of the state of Oklahoma.


Missouri is a single state school in a ~6 million population state

Oklahoma is a dual state school in a ~4 million population state
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
31205 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 2:38 pm to
Screw OU - they had their chance and they stuck with Texas. They made their bed now they have to lay in it.

Posted by aggressor
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2011
8796 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 2:40 pm to
No law but politically it would be almost impossible for OU and OSU to separate. The only way OU could do it is if they found a landing spot for OSU and no one wants them. OU leaving the B12 would push Texas to bail as well and if that happened then the B12 isn't viable as a major conference, it barely is now.

Texas also is stuck politically. Tech, Baylor, and TCU all are dependent on Texas because no other conference would take them as they are Non AAU schools (Tech is esp bad academically) and have tiny fanbases. Texas simply cannot take on the power base of all 3 of those schools to leave unless A&M supported them (lulz). The best part of the divorce with Texas was we left them with the kids and we are free and clear.

More than that though, the only reason to add schools is to make money. Adding OU doesn't make money, at best OU and Texas are net neutral adds because neither adds enough new TV's The only place expansion makes logical sense is Virginia and North Carolina and UVA and UNC are the prizes by far in the re-alignment game. The GOR means nothing if those 2 schools bailed btw because the ACC would fold. The biggest poker game left in realignment is if the Big!G or the SEC gets those 2 schools, they are easily the biggest prizes as 2 of the most powerful public schools in the AAU with extremely deep pockets.
Posted by blacknblu
Member since Nov 2011
10276 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 2:44 pm to
Maybe not a fulltime member. Maybe an OOC we pass around like camp meat 2 games a year - home games only. 1 game in the East, 1 in the West.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
59125 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

The state of Missouri has almost twice the population of the State of Oklahoma


So. It also has a significantly larger population than Arky, La, Ms and Alabama....do you suggest Mizzou is a more integral member of the SEC because the state has 4 million Cardinal fans?

Sure kick Bama out, it splits a state!

OU is down but twice the draw Mizzou is, regionally and nationally
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
75569 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 3:16 pm to
Who wants to listen to boomer frickin' sooner 20 times every Saturday?
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34688 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

So. It also has a significantly larger population than Arky, La, Ms and Alabama....do you suggest Mizzou is a more integral member of the SEC because the state has 4 million Cardinal fans?



Right now Mizzou is worth more to the SEC than Arky, the Miss schools, etc. It is just a fact.

quote:

Sure kick Bama out, it splits a state!



I don't think kicking anyone out is under consideration.

quote:

OU is down but twice the draw Mizzou is, regionally and nationally



Maybe, but that value isn't the same to every conference.

Every conference has a few elite programs that are tent poles, some middle of the road programs for filler, and some cannon fodder to take up the losses. Let look at the tent poles per conference:

4/14 tent poles B1G: Michigan, Ohio St, Penn St., Nebraska

3/14 ACC: Miami, Florida St., Clemson

3/14 PAC: USC, UCLA, Washington

2/10 Big 12: Texas, OU

Compare that to the SEC:

6/14 SEC: Bama, Tenn, LSU, Auburn, UF, GA

By the ratio, the SEC is doing better than any other conference already. It doesn't need another tent pole to still have a great ratio at 16.

That means even though OU might be a great national draw, some OTHER conference needs that national draw more. The SEC needs POPULATION to go sell its already strong brand to.

The problem with taking an OU is the Minnesota Effect: changing times might make it a waste

I mean, for every SEC conference win someone has to lose. Either OU comes in and competes at its historical levels (which REQUIRES one of the Big 6 taking a step down to make room in the W column), or they settle in the middle of the pack and the "national draw" bonus points are lost.

The SEC doesn't need OUs, it needs NC Sts and VPIs. It needs A&Ms and Mizzou. It needs cable subscribers to grow.
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
31205 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 3:43 pm to
Does OU want the SEC?

I think some of their fans realize they missed the train a few years ago and now they're stranded in a conference with a bully and a bunch of peons. The conference is a joke.
Posted by Mizzou4ever
Kansas City, Mo
Member since Nov 2011
15284 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

I would love it, take em in the West and move AU to the East. kick Mizzou o


Sure, but we want the chance to get your arse first before we leave.
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
20985 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Take a look at the realignment threads on LINK (LandTheives)


Oh my! Are their tears sweet! "What if" scenarios out the arse.

Too bad they threw their lot in with the duplicitous Big Tex.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
58899 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

4/14 tent poles B1G: Michigan, Ohio St, Penn St., Nebraska

3/14 ACC: Miami, Florida St., Clemson

3/14 PAC: USC, UCLA, Washington

2/10 Big 12: Texas, OU


I might further split the tent poles
B1G = full pole (UM + OSU) and 3/4 pole (PSU + UNL)
ACC = full pole (FSU + ND) and 3/4 pole (UM and CU)
PAC = full pole (USC historic + OU current) and 3/4 pole (UW + UCLA)
B12 = Full pole (Utx + OU) + no real 3/4 poles


quote:

By the ratio, the SEC is doing better than any other conference already. It doesn't need another tent pole to still have a great ratio at 16.


Amen brother! It is also why the SEC does not need to go to 9 conference games

quote:

The SEC needs POPULATION to go sell its already strong brand to.

The problem with taking an OU is the Minnesota Effect: changing times might make it a waste


Very well put!

FWIW, Had Bernie stayed at Tulane instead of taking the Gopher job imagine Tulane in the SEC now.
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
20985 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

Literally no one wanted Mizzou in the SEC.


As old SLU coach Charlie Spoonhour used to say, "I wasn't my wife's first choice either".

btw, F-U Bucknut.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34688 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Oh my! Are their tears sweet! "What if" scenarios out the arse.



It is the same thing on Shaggybevo. It dawns on them that every option sucks.

The B1G? Fly across the country to play Iowa and Rutgers

The PAC? Be in a division with Utah and Arizona instead of California and deal with late kickoffs

The SEC? You followed Aggy and you have to deal with that shame forever

There is no great option for them. Hence why they got so excited when it looked like for 1.5 seconds that Florida State might go to the Big 12. Or why they pine for Arky or LSU to leave the SEC and join the Big 12 to stabilize that league.

The main thing I see them hoping for is this:



Aka that some major lawsuit, or some sort of regulation, comes in and flips the entire conference thing on its head.

There is the assumption that if this happens that the top 30 or so programs would break away in a mini NFL, leaving behind old conference affiliations. Basically they fricked up so bad that unless someone else resets the clock on conferences they know that they will never have an option that is as good as the 2009 version of the Big 12.

Couldn't happen to a nicer group of people.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34688 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

I might further split the tent poles
B1G = full pole (UM + OSU) and 3/4 pole (PSU + UNL)
ACC = full pole (FSU + ND) and 3/4 pole (UM and CU)
PAC = full pole (USC historic + OU current) and 3/4 pole (UW + UCLA)
B12 = Full pole (Utx + OU) + no real 3/4 poles


Yeah I considered doing it that way but I got lazy. Thank you!

quote:

Amen brother! It is also why the SEC does not need to go to 9 conference games



At least unless we get something REALLY nice in return from the rest of the Power 5. Like some rule change that only benefits the SEC really.

quote:

FWIW, Had Bernie stayed at Tulane instead of taking the Gopher job imagine Tulane in the SEC now.



I bet LSU fans don't want to imagine a SEC-power Tulane.
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

It's not just TAMU. The fact that Baylor and now TCU are really good and pulling in several 4 star recruits, in addition to TAMU and LSU swiping up top recruits in Texas, is really crippling them. These Texas kids have many more options now than just that rust bucket in Oklahoma.



Exactly correct. In 15 years, OU may have the same appeal as picking up Nebraska, but with even less prestige. A once great program that has rusted twice over.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
58899 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

I bet LSU fans don't want to imagine a SEC-power Tulane.


The stadium opened on the old sugar plantation and the first Sugar Bowl had Tulane beating Temple 20-14. I think the "queen of the south" eventually got to what 80K seating? The bigger point is it was on Tulane's campus and was their home stadium during their time in the SEC. Bernie left Tulane after the 30 or 31 Rose Bowl and that Golden Decade of the Gophers would have been the Golden Decade of the Green Wave.
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 4:56 pm to
Auburn whines so much about being in the East I think I'd be ok replacing them with Oklahoma.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 21
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 21Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter