Started By
Message

re: Death of College Athletics

Posted on 12/7/18 at 8:24 am to
Posted by Mojave1864
Vegoose
Member since Oct 2018
114 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 8:24 am to
quote:

SEC football is threatened by the significant drop in youth and high school football across this country. Football in general is threatened.


Which was not the issue raised in the OP, and therefore not implicated in my response. Read closer.
Posted by HTDawg
Member since Sep 2016
6683 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 8:35 am to
quote:

Which was not the issue raised in the OP, and therefore not implicated in my response. Read closer.


Which was why my response to the op was basically forget about the other sports, football itself is on a march to death.
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 8:37 am to
Thanks for proving my point low IQ
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29177 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 8:38 am to
The SEC is kind of an example of how college athletics should be more ubiquitous and not the "haves/haves not". College football needs to expand the playoff with not one, but two automatic bids for the G5.
Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
7482 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 8:39 am to
Live Sports is where advertisers are throwing buckets of cash. It's the one place where people can't filter out commercials. The Big 10 and SEC Networks are generating vulgar amounts of money for the conferences and the ACC network goes online August 2019 which should be a shot in the arm for the conference. Football and Basketball will perform well, but I'll watch a live Wrestling tournament or some other live Olympic sport if it looks good. I think live Baseball is going to perform well as that college sport seems to be growing in popularity.

How schools are choosing to spend that money is the real issue. If they are trying to keep up with the Jones's then many schools will get burned.

A program just can't flip a switch and be great all of a sudden. It takes a long time to develop and keep the kind of fan base that will support a program through the bad times as well as the good times.

I just don't want to see college football evolve into an NFL model where a 3-4 loss team has a legit chance at competing for a national title. Expanding the playoffs to an NFL type format I think would kill the sport. Regular season games would become meaningless, key players would sit out certain games to save themselves and fans would become more comfortable with a few losses rather than now treating a single loss as a Mortal Kombat Fatality.

College Football is in a really good place but it would only take a few bad decisions to screw it up.
Posted by LarryDavid
Los Angeles
Member since Sep 2010
4207 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 8:41 am to
Oh, yeah, I thought you had taken too many shots to the head and were going to #MeToo us.
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 9:01 am to
We can agree to disagree with the regular seasons becoming meaningless. Even with a 16 game playoff we are talking a much less percentage of total teams than the NFL making the playoff. There are 5 3 loss teams and 1 4 loss team in the top 16. Texas would have been a 3 loss team if not for the championship game. Its a legitimate argument that these teams shouldnt have a chance for a national title...that said those teams probably would never win it.

You also have to look at it as the playoff really being an extension of the regular season. A team would have to win 4 games to take home the NC. If the first two rounds were played on campuses, that would be like two more home and homes.

Im not saying its perfect. There is give and take for everything. For many teams the season becomes meaningless pretty quickly. While the intensity for the undefeated and one loss matchups might lower a bit, the intensity for all other games around the country would offset that tremendously.
Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
7482 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 9:23 am to
I get what you are saying, but College Football doesn't have the parity that you have in the NFL and I never hope it gets that way. While I like the 4 time format, I do think about 6 is about as far as it needs to expand because I think there is a significant drop off in quality of teams after about 6.

There is another issue about expanding the playoffs and that is the cost to the fans. Right now with just 2 playoffs games your are talking very expensive trips that the average college football fan will struggle to be able to pay for with it being over the Christmas holidays...I already think that multiple playoff sites should be set aside to better accommodate teams. If Clemson and Alabama end up playing for the title, it should be played in the South at a play like Atlanta, Charlotte, Tampa, Jax to accommodate the fan bases and the top contender should have that choice. Right now 2 teams from the South will have to go to California to play and that's just not good.

I admit there is a part of me that would not mind an expanded playoff. Let's to it in small increments to see how it works. Lets go to 6 teams for 5 years and if it needs to get bigger then go to 8 for another 5 years with "Look-In" options at the end of each you to make the necessary adjustments.
Posted by agswin
The Republic of Texas
Member since Aug 2011
4337 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Sorry about the fake punt man


When people ask me why I read the Rant, I refer them to post like this.


I laughed for 10 minutes. I love this place.
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 10:43 am to
quote:

There is another issue about expanding the playoffs and that is the cost to the fans.


First two rounds on campus. Would not be a huge burden on fans, especially if season was shortened to 11 games.

quote:

Right now with just 2 playoffs games your are talking very expensive trips that the average college football fan will struggle to be able to pay for with it being over the Christmas holidays


NC game is 475 face value...in an expensive part of California. Yeah its way overpriced and you wont have normal fans going to that game. Completely agree there

quote:

I already think that multiple playoff sites should be set aside to better accommodate teams.


Agreed. Bama-OU lets play in Nashville or New Orleans. Clemson-ND Charlotte, Nashville, etc. Id even be ok with a college stadium hosting if there were enough hotel rooms in that town.

We can agree to disagree on the expanded playoff. Right now bowls are being held on to because that is what we know. Unfortunately its a sinking ship. The bowls have no meaning anymore and its sad(from a fan perspective) that only 4 teams can really have a meaningful post-season.

Id kill to have 16 games with national championship implications within a 45ish day period. It would would be lifeblood to a sport that, as it is now, is slowly fading. Youd bring back the west coast fans as well.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54595 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Not for the money makers


Even the money makers will die, and it will be sooner than most think.

As an old guy, those between 105 and 75 have been the bulk of the donations as they have the bulk of the money. The pre war generation is dying quickly because they are old and those nearer the end of the baby boom (say 1950 to 1960) are getting too old to care.

Problem is they have been supporting bloated salaries and office costs that have been growing well faster than both inflation and average wages. This will lead to a perfect storm very soon as TV is only 1/3 of the revenue stream while 1/3 is donations and 1/3 is live event revenue. Imagine any company where 1/3 of its revenues disappears over a few short years. Multiply that by universities that know how to spend, but not spend efficiently.

Granted I am old, but in my generation they were smart and kept fan cost low so the poor and middle class kids could produce the next generations of donors. The bigger problem is sports were the event but the real value was cementing interpersonal relationships with the fans. Fans sat next to each other for generations and created bonds with each other exceeding just the sporting event. That has been replaced by corporate folks who change from game to game and would rather discuss their money than their family.

quote:

Today, most colleges are struggling to keep athletics


Not as much as you would think because they have old farts to donate. The real issue is they continue to spend like lottery winners and less like Scottish bankers. Leadership ASSUMES that the money will grow at 15% and they can give themselves a 15% raise each year. Clearly this is not the case but they do not see it because they would have to earn less and spend less.


quote:

The old guard doesn't want to recognize this, but it is true.


Who do you think the old guard is? The old guard of fans have watched the money grab over the past 20 years and certainly the past 10 with disgust. The old guard of presidents and AD's are NOT the old guard in case you have not noticed. That is part of the problem as presidents and AD's are replaced it is not with a modest and sustainable 2% to 4% but a 200% to 400% that can not be sustained long term. Paying the former AD 200K and his replacement 2M will catch up sooner than later.

The bigger issue is the facilities arms race going on right now where only the handful of contractors are the real winners. College kids may be young but not stupid in they know this is jay throwing money in a fire as opposed to using it to build a future. It is not that a place like Berea College exists, it is that so few want to ensure their own future by learning how they did it.
Posted by John Milner
Member since Jan 2015
6448 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Back in the old days, you didn't have TV at all,


damn. You an old fricker ain't ye
Posted by John Milner
Member since Jan 2015
6448 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 11:17 am to
quote:

Sorry about the fake punt man


How long till there is a poster by the name of "Kirby's Fake Punter"
This post was edited on 12/7/18 at 11:18 am
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54595 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Everything is cyclical. There is a downward trend now but things can be turned around. A lot of this has to do with universities having milked every dollar out of football programs with every old tradition and every bit of fan experience for sale to the highest bidder.


I am beginning to doubt this because those in charge will not take a pay cut to make it happen. They will go down with the ship instead of getting to port and fixing it while you still can.

Any old farmer worth his salt was smart enough to set back part of this years seed to grow next years crop. The current AD's and presidents have gone the other way in insuring the next generation of fans don't grow and mature because they don't have money today.
Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
7482 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Id kill to have 16 games with national championship implications within a 45ish day period. It would would be lifeblood to a sport that, as it is now, is slowly fading. Youd bring back the west coast fans as well.


Let me ask you a question with regards to the 16 team model you advocate. Would those first round teams that are beaten be done for the year or would you allow them to attend a bowl perhaps against those schools that did not make the 16 team tournament? Just curious.

I do like 12 games in a regular season because I like more football and not less. Most teams also need that extra game for the income and if only 16 teams make the tournament then that's going to be a pretty sizable pay cut for a lot of programs.
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Let me ask you a question with regards to the 16 team model you advocate. Would those first round teams that are beaten be done for the year or would you allow them to attend a bowl perhaps against those schools that did not make the 16 team tournament? Just curious.


Done lose you are out.

quote:

for the income


CFB will ride this train to the grave. Sacrificing everything for a dollar today will eventually have everyone fighting over nickels later
This post was edited on 12/7/18 at 12:18 pm
Posted by yatesdog38
in your head rent free
Member since Sep 2013
12737 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 12:17 pm to
Sounds like your deepwater well dried up. Sorry you are out of a job. Shouldn't be too hard to get another tho.
Posted by Slackaveli
Fayetteville
Member since Jul 2017
15163 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Sorry about the fake punt man
That fake punt was like nervously going all-in with a pair of 3s
This post was edited on 12/7/18 at 12:23 pm
Posted by gohogs141
Fayetteville
Member since Jun 2011
7511 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

SEC football is threatened by the significant drop in youth and high school football across this country.


Yeah Little Rock used to produce a fair number of football athletes for us, but now most of them are playing basketball. Cheaper for non-affluent families and easier to play.
Posted by theliontamer
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2015
856 posts
Posted on 12/7/18 at 12:43 pm to
I think you're right man, going to sporting events is just not fun anymore. If i really want to watch the game, I want to watch it on tv. If i want to socialize, i would rather just tailgate and go to the bar.

Games are definitely still cool, and I go to a couple every year, but i have no desire to go every week like back in undergrad. People that do go every week, I image they just have nothing better to do.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter