theliontamer

Yea, def nice stadium. And willing to spend money on baseball. But history and tradition seems to mean a lot less. So, any school can get kids to come play. Miss State may have money, but they don't have UNC money. But, I think it comes down to location. It's hard enough convincing people to move to the deep south. A lot of highly paid coaches (and athletes) would not want to live in Starkville MS.

I wish all the unhappy people would just leave this country. But, they have to cede their citizenship first. We should pay them to do it.

Honestly haven't had a single problem with the amazon delivery people. And I live in mid city.

I don't see food truck as a good business venture. The food is overpriced, served on paper plates, and you have to fight to park somewhere that actually gets volume. I just don't see the revenue to where it is worth your while. Working weekends. Taxes, insurance, overhead, and maintenance eat way too much into profit. Unless you are trying to get you feet wet on entering the restaurant industry, it's a bad move.

I honestly blame the women 100% on unplanned pregnancies. It's their body their choice. There are a million forms of birth control and contraceptives out there. And they are the ones that get the government support. Cut off that financial support, and I bet you would see a drastic drop in single mother "unplanned" pregnancies.

We need to focus on reducing these people from having children in the first place, stop incentivizing it. We need to put forth an effort to attract the middle class to have children. It is a dangerous spiral we are caught in. The poverty class is not starving, they are eating junk food and drinking soda. A little more regulation would force them to make do with limited staples as opposed to corporate sponsored obesity. The children already eat in the schools also. And yes, you will be disadvantaged if you are raised by shitty parents. Life is not fair. It is not everyone else's fault that your parents were shite heads, and if they cant provide the bare minimum services to raise you, then maybe state sponsored homes would actually be better for you.

Widespread government benefits and subsidies are doing more harm than taking up tax funding. They hurt the community.

Everyone wants to live in safe and decent neighborhood. And let's face reality, the people on these government benefits are typically uneducated, unemployed, and less respectful of surrounding property. The government benefits allow these people to live in the same neighborhoods as hardworking lower and middle class Americans. We can preach all we want about equality and kindness, but when there's a guy smoking crack on the street corner and selling drugs in his house, it's not somewhere you want to raise kids. It's a slap in the face of people that worked hard to get into that neighborhood.

This causes unhappiness in that population of hardworking families (the people we actually should be helping). They then are burdened with the stress of figuring out a solution to the country's problem, because it has come the their door step. This causes a spike in blue collar wages, because they now need more money to avoid these people, or they see they can be subsidized to live in the same neighborhood, so they give up. This causes higher wages for plumbing/trucking/construction work, which is then passed on to the general consumer. The elite class does not feel the financial burden and the renting in city class does not deal with these costs either. They are heavily carried by the working single family. The corporate world really doesn't produce much, so they are less likely to raise wages, further stifling the middle class.

I think they should gut these programs and heavily reform the social construct of the poverty class. Fear of poverty should be driving people to work.

Younger kids dont drink much anymore. Also Colleges started accepting everyone who applies, so the clientele probably got pretty rough in the mid major college towns.

Yea, I think capping politicians at 75 would be more than reasonable. Should really be 70. Their job doesn't require any skill, they are supposed to be the voice of the people. Retire and be a consultant for a younger politician if you think your knowledge is irreplaceable. They just want the power and a legacy.

My experience in the industry: The trial attorneys are way worse than the insurance guys. They need to be regulated like the insurance companies if they are going to affect the market this much.