Started By
Message

re: Danny Sheridan has the info

Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:31 pm to
Posted by DonAUfan
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2011
363 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:31 pm to
quote:

To think they had verifiable evidence of money changing hands in one corner of the NCAA offices, but ignored it and reinstated Cam solely on the basis of info AU gave them is laughable.


Exactly, why would they have info and not take it into consideration?
Posted by Dribble
Hey, nice marmot.
Member since Jun 2008
9576 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

Alahunter

I can't scan though 69 pages of BS could you give me a cliff note?
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57010 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:32 pm to
Actually it appears from your previous quote that they have two bodies one that deals from the athletes side and another that deals from the institutional side. The reinstatement side handles the eligibility of the student. Does it say anywhere the have no investigative capabilities?
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86321 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:34 pm to
quote:

To think they had verifiable evidence of money changing hands in one corner of the NCAA offices, but ignored it and reinstated Cam solely on the basis of info AU gave them is laughable.
Wait, no one is saying that.

Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54836 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:34 pm to
quote:

I can't scan though 69 pages of BS could you give me a cliff note?

DS claims he now has the name of the alleged bagman but would not reveal it because he was afraid he would be sued and forced to reveal the identity of his source.

That is the only new info in the entire thread.
Posted by chilld28
Get in B Chord and Mash It!!
Member since Nov 2009
29622 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:34 pm to
quote:

The student-athlete reinstatement process provides for the evaluation of information submitted by an NCAA member institution on behalf of enrolled and prospective student-athletes who have been involved in violations of NCAA regulations that affect their eligibility.


quote:

Student-athlete reinstatement decisions are based on an evaluation of the information provided to the staff by the involved school, given the NCAA reinstatement staff’s role is not investigatory in nature. While the student-athlete reinstatement staff may ask additional questions related to the reinstatement request, it is the school’s responsibility to provide all necessary information for the staff to consider.


LINK
Posted by secfan123
beverly hills
Member since Jan 2010
9646 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:34 pm to
How is this still going? How do you get 69 pges when a guy DOESNT name names?
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

I am saying the NCAA had been investigating the matter for months and didn't ignore information they already had (whether from enforcement or eligibility) and rely solely on what AU provided.


Link that shows this, please. Anywhere, that compliance or enforcement did this. Not the NCAA Prez who was getting lambasted and kept coming out trying to get the media off his arse. But from the folks who actually made the decisions.

quote:

To think they had verifiable evidence of money changing hands in one corner of the NCAA offices, but ignored it and reinstated Cam solely on the basis of info AU gave them is laughable.


Again. They are separate from one another and do not base reinstatement on anything other than what is given them from the University at the time. Otherwise, please.. a link showing that both enforcement and compliance worked together on this 24 hr decision. From someone that didn't have a vested interest in getting the media off his back.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54836 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

Link that shows this, please. Anywhere, that compliance or enforcement did this. Not the NCAA Prez
So you want a link, but not the one from the head guy I already provided? Nice.

Show me the smoking gun, as long as it isn't that gun over there that is smoking.
Posted by Dribble
Hey, nice marmot.
Member since Jun 2008
9576 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

DS claims he now has the name of the alleged bagman but would not reveal it because he was afraid he would be sued and forced to reveal the identity of his source.

That is the only new info in the entire thread.



Pretty much what I thought he would do.

Thanks WDE24.


ETA: - kick off can't get here soon enough.
This post was edited on 8/17/11 at 7:38 pm
Posted by NEWOTiger
New Orleans, La.
Member since May 2010
449 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:37 pm to
Basically been a bad day for some of our SEC West brethren.

Yahoo 10, Danny boy, FBI tapes all produced squat. (AU wise)

See post below. They a little upset.

This post was edited on 8/17/11 at 7:43 pm
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

I can't scan though 69 pages of BS could you give me a cliff note


Have no idea for 67. The last two, WDE is saying Cam's reinstatement was based on investigation by compliance AND enforcement staff. Even though the NCAA guidelines, state they do not work together and base reinstatement decisions, based on the info a University provides them of the investigation that said University has done.
Posted by blzr
Saratoga
Member since Mar 2011
30744 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

So you want a link, but not the one from the head guy I already provided? Nice.



NCAA Prez not a reliable source
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

Show me the smoking gun, as long as it isn't that gun over there that is smoking


I haven't stated anything about DS or Cam's guilt. I am simply contesting your claim that enforcement played a role in his reinstatement. You've made some definitive statements on how the NCAA handled that aspect, and it is in direct discrepency on how that is actually handled.
Posted by Dribble
Hey, nice marmot.
Member since Jun 2008
9576 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

Cam's reinstatement was based on investigation by compliance AND enforcement staff.




Well just to keep an open mind....
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

NCAA Prez not a reliable source


Not when his statements are after he's getting nailed by every major news source and is in direct conflict of how the NCAA departments actually work.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86321 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

Exactly, why would they have info and not take it into consideration?
I'm not saying they had it. I'm sayin, the two work independant of one another. They people dealing with eligibility typically have no idea what the ongoing investigation has. They don't even ask.


Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54836 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

You've made some definitive statements on how the NCAA handled that aspect, and it is in direct discrepency on how that is actually handled.
I've simply repeated what the NCAA president said when discussing the Cam case specifically and how it was handled (and provided video evidence). Since he isn't reliable in your opinion, there isn't much else to discuss.
This post was edited on 8/17/11 at 7:42 pm
Posted by DonAUfan
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2011
363 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

The last two, WDE is saying Cam's reinstatement was based on investigation by compliance AND enforcement staff. Even though the NCAA guidelines, state they do not work together and base reinstatement decisions, based on the info a University provides them of the investigation that said University has done.


You should have looked at Pages 65 and 66. What was stated was that they made their decision based on info that was provided by MSU and Auburn. It was stated that they don't share any info given to them and that is not correct.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

They people dealing with eligibility typically have no idea what the ongoing investigation has. They don't even ask


Exactly. And what the NCAA says on their website. Contrary to WDE's claim.
Jump to page
Page First 67 68 69 70 71 72
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 69 of 72Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter