Started By
Message
re: Curious what Bama and Auburn fans think...
Posted on 10/10/11 at 10:30 pm to NATidefan
Posted on 10/10/11 at 10:30 pm to NATidefan
Holy fricking shite-balls...
I don't know about Auburn, but if you think Alabama receives preferential treatment from the zebras, you seriously need to open you eyes.
I'll concede the PP7 non-interception call in '09 was BS, but there were also three questionable/bullshite calls in that game that went LSU's way as well. Peterson's call stood out the most because of how close the game was and it happened at a critical point in the game.
I've seen numerous times where calls were missed against 'Bama in almost every game, and I've also seen where calls were missed against Alabama's opponents.
It's a two-way street, peeps, whether you want it to be or not. Sit down and watch an entire game next time if you'd like to see it for yourself.
Have we forgotten the Arkansas and Georgia games last year? Or the 2004 and 2006 LSU games? Seriously, take your REC BS (which you were beating around the bush) back to ITAT or ATPB.
I don't know about Auburn, but if you think Alabama receives preferential treatment from the zebras, you seriously need to open you eyes.
I'll concede the PP7 non-interception call in '09 was BS, but there were also three questionable/bullshite calls in that game that went LSU's way as well. Peterson's call stood out the most because of how close the game was and it happened at a critical point in the game.
I've seen numerous times where calls were missed against 'Bama in almost every game, and I've also seen where calls were missed against Alabama's opponents.
It's a two-way street, peeps, whether you want it to be or not. Sit down and watch an entire game next time if you'd like to see it for yourself.
quote:
1. I believe bama gets the calls and benefit of the doubt a disproportionate amount. I won't speculate as to why and do not believe it is necessarily intentional and I do not believe it is any conspiracy, but I think it happens year in and year out over time.
Have we forgotten the Arkansas and Georgia games last year? Or the 2004 and 2006 LSU games? Seriously, take your REC BS (which you were beating around the bush) back to ITAT or ATPB.
2
Posted on 10/10/11 at 10:38 pm to BradPitt
IMO Auburn gets the most "close calls" go their way.
I've felt for UA and UF when Playing AU, otherwise, sec officials are weak
I've felt for UA and UF when Playing AU, otherwise, sec officials are weak
Posted on 10/10/11 at 11:09 pm to TigerFanFontenot
SEC always takes care of its milk cow....every year the benefit goes to the better teams
2007- LINK
yall got the calls, 2009 florida got the calls against arkansas, 2009 we got the interception call against you, last year auburn got away with stuff. Its nothing to do with the state of alabama, its all about making sure we have teams in the best bowls so we get the most money.
2007- LINK
yall got the calls, 2009 florida got the calls against arkansas, 2009 we got the interception call against you, last year auburn got away with stuff. Its nothing to do with the state of alabama, its all about making sure we have teams in the best bowls so we get the most money.
Posted on 10/10/11 at 11:30 pm to crimsontde65
i remember matt caddells catch against LSU in 2007 being called complete and then OVERTURNED when the ball didn't even touch the ground. LINK
Posted on 10/10/11 at 11:48 pm to mla0003
To the OP - did you watch the Arkansas game last Sat? Not the reason we lost or anything, but we got hosed on some big calls. Everyone has calls for them and against them. Even LSU (one that immediately comes to mind is the spot on 4th down in the 2007 game in BR).
Posted on 10/11/11 at 7:16 am to BurnHardLonger
The quality of officiating is not uniform from crew to crew in the SEC. Some crews are awful. Some are good. Every team in the league has been the beneficiary of some bad calls. Some of them really bad. I don't think LSU or any other school gets worse/better treatment.
Posted on 10/11/11 at 8:06 am to BurnHardLonger
quote:
It seems with the Wing "taunting" penalty that the "State of Alabama" favoritism in officiating is beginning to surface again.
You do realize that Florida isn't in Alabama, right?
Posted on 10/11/11 at 8:13 am to BurnHardLonger
Posted on 10/11/11 at 8:17 am to BradPitt
quote:
Have we forgotten the Arkansas and Georgia games last year? Or the 2004 and 2006 LSU games? Seriously, take your REC BS (which you were beating around the bush) back to ITAT or ATPB.
You can go frick yourself asshat
1. I have never made a post on ITAT and rarely even go there. ATPB? Maybe you should take your arse there gump. Why would I? That is where YOU belong.
2. I stated my opinion and said so. A lot of others share that opinion, in fact it seems to be a consensus around the SEC in general. I can name a half dozen bad calls ALL in Bama's favor from last year's IB alone. There is no need to go down that road (as you seem to want) however.
Posted on 10/11/11 at 8:18 am to BurnHardLonger
quote:
It seems with the Wing "taunting" penalty that the "State of Alabama" favoritism in officiating is beginning to surface again.
How did you come to the conclusion that a penalty in the LSU / UF game shows SEC favoritism to the "State of Alabama"?
Posted on 10/11/11 at 8:29 am to TigerFanFontenot
Since CPA isn't here.
Posted on 10/11/11 at 8:33 am to BurnHardLonger
Posted on 10/11/11 at 8:39 am to Joe Blow
Don't hit'em with stats and facts, it screws everything up
Posted on 10/11/11 at 8:47 am to bona fide
Its amazing that LSU fans always conveniently forget that EASILY the worst call of the 2009 SEC season went their favor in the Arkansas game.
Petrino really should be undefeated against LSU. Move the SEC office out of Birmingham.
Petrino really should be undefeated against LSU. Move the SEC office out of Birmingham.
Posted on 10/11/11 at 8:52 am to bona fide
quote:
Don't hit'em with stats and facts, it screws everything up
Just curious if you clicked the link and happened to notice that less penalties get called on bama than any team in the SEC every single year?
Bama is ranked #2, #1, #3, #2, #1 in having the fewest penalties called against them.
Argue that however you like, just pointing out what the stats show.
This post was edited on 10/11/11 at 8:53 am
Posted on 10/11/11 at 9:02 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
Just curious if you clicked the link and happened to notice that less penalties get called on bama than any team in the SEC every single year?
Bama is ranked #2, #1, #3, #2, #1 in having the fewest penalties called against them.
Argue that however you like, just pointing out what the stats show.
Bama prides itself on discipline and good sportsmanship.
Posted on 10/11/11 at 9:09 am to crimsonsaint
Sounds good to me. 
I just stated my opinion here and not just as it relates to bama, but I think the home teams in the SEC tend to get too many calls as well.
I just stated my opinion here and not just as it relates to bama, but I think the home teams in the SEC tend to get too many calls as well.
Posted on 10/11/11 at 9:11 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
I clicked on the link and noticed that Bama's opponents have been called for less penalties than any other SEC team
Posted on 10/11/11 at 9:15 am to BurnHardLonger
quote:
BurnHardLonger
Burn yourself just a little bit longer and you should feel better.
Posted on 10/11/11 at 9:25 am to bona fide
quote:
I clicked on the link and noticed that Bama's opponents have been called for less penalties than any other SEC team
Actually middle of the pack at a 5.8 ranking for opponents penalties called.
Page 4 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News