Started By
Message

re: Confirmed: NCAA investigation of Auburn continues

Posted on 7/14/11 at 9:15 am to
Posted by GregYoureMyBoyBlue
Member since Apr 2011
2964 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 9:15 am to
Well at least when Auburn cheated, they won something....more than i can say for GTech

LINK
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54843 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 9:16 am to
The NCAA often combines multiple investigations into one school all into one. It very well could be that the investigation into the Cam incident is mostly finished, but the NCAA is still looking at other things (street agents, HBO4, etc.). Just a thought.
Posted by townhallsavoy
Member since Oct 2007
3045 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 9:18 am to
I think the media caused the NCAA to act.

Things were getting out of hand.

Douchebags like Thayer Evans were starting to report on Cam's confidential academic record (which were refuted by Florida).

Imagine every news agency out there started reporting that Trent Richardson was bought. That he was a bad person. That he shouldn't be on the field.

We have to remember that we're dealing with young men. Even if they make mistakes, we can't treat them like objects.

If the reports affected Trent's play, that would not only mess up Trent's life but infuriate Alabama fans.

So you would want the NCAA to at least do something to quell the storm even though they were going to investigate the matter over the long term.

Just my two cents.
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
108548 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 9:28 am to
quote:

bama my heart


The arm of the NCAA that handles players eligibility issues is the one that cleared Cam.

The Enforcement Arm of the NCAA which investigates coaches, admin, boosters, etc. is the one that has yet to conclude. Is how I understand it anyway.
Posted by LSUdm21
Member since Nov 2008
17486 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 9:32 am to
quote:

The arm of the NCAA that handles players eligibility issues is the one that cleared Cam.


I think the key to Cam's eligibility was them using the pharse, "at this time." Leaving the door open if more info was found later.

quote:

The Enforcement Arm of the NCAA which investigates coaches, admin, boosters, etc. is the one that has yet to conclude. Is how I understand it anyway.


Which probably remained open due to your boys running their mouths to HBO.
Posted by Wild Thang
YAW YAW Fooball Nation
Member since Jun 2009
44181 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 9:33 am to
Just wanted to post in here.
Posted by AUtigR24
Happy Hour
Member since Apr 2011
20142 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 9:38 am to
This is what the NYtimes didn't tell you.
The conversation between CHiz and the NCAA started from a Q & A session specifically designated for any questions the coaches had for the NCAA.

The session began with Tennessee coach Derek Dooley calling for the NCAA to speed up investigations because lengthy probes are killing recruiting,
Just and example of how journalism can leave out details to make a story sound different.
Posted by ThaKaptin
The Sultan of Swag
Member since Nov 2010
21741 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 9:41 am to
quote:

The arm of the NCAA that handles players eligibility issues is the one that cleared Cam.

The Enforcement Arm of the NCAA which investigates coaches, admin, boosters, etc. is the one that has yet to conclude. Is how I understand it anyway.


Kind of, you are right when you say there are 2 committee's, but your purposes are a little off.

There is a committee that is devoted solely to eligibility issues. They do everything from checking grades, dealing with transfer issues, and in the case of Cam Newton, possible infractions that would effect eligibility. They dont actually do investigations on this though. The only info they use to make their decisions is the info provided by the schools themselves. So when they cleared Cam, it was based solely on the information provided to them by Auburn and possibly Miss St if they talked to them.

The committee on infractions has investigators that go out and attempt to dig up evidence to prove allegations against a team. They actually do the investigating themselves instead of relying solely on the word of a coach, AD, etc.

The "Clearinghouse" can clear a player to play and then the infractions committee can later come back and say that they were in fact NOT eligible because the clearinghouse was working off of inaccurate information. Sometimes this information is conveyed to them as a mistake, sometimes schools just flat out lie. This is where the infractions committee decides whether sanctions are in order or not.
This post was edited on 7/14/11 at 9:43 am
Posted by Dribble
Hey, nice marmot.
Member since Jun 2008
9576 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Just and example of how journalism can leave out details to make a story sound different.

How does that make it any different?
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
54361 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 9:51 am to
it makes dooley be the bad guy, and chizik the one who tries to get dooley's back
Posted by ThaKaptin
The Sultan of Swag
Member since Nov 2010
21741 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 9:52 am to
quote:

How does that make it any different?


I guess cause Dooley brought up the subject first? Not really relevant in my humble opinion. Mean Gene is the one that went off on her about never being told when the investigation was over.... which it never was.
Posted by ThaKaptin
The Sultan of Swag
Member since Nov 2010
21741 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 9:52 am to
Riiiiiight..

Posted by Dribble
Hey, nice marmot.
Member since Jun 2008
9576 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 9:54 am to
quote:

it makes dooley be the bad guy, and chizik the one who tries to get dooley's back
OK...
Posted by townhallsavoy
Member since Oct 2007
3045 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:03 am to
quote:

This is what the NYtimes didn't tell you.
The conversation between CHiz and the NCAA started from a Q & A session specifically designated for any questions the coaches had for the NCAA.


We as Auburn fans need to admit that Chizik made a mistake in asking this question.

If all is clear on Auburn's front, then don't worry about it until the NCAA says something.
Posted by GFunk
Denham Springs
Member since Feb 2011
14970 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:04 am to
quote:

Imagine every news agency out there started reporting that Trent Richardson was bought.


I heard Mom was very expensive for the REC. I'm also sure that all 17-18 year olds with 3 year old kids are fine, upstanding citizens that are healthy contributors to their community & society at large.
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
108548 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:05 am to
quote:

ThaKaptin



[
quote:

Roe Lach: The cases you mentioned were decided by our Student-Athlete Reinstatement department, which is actually housed in the Academic and Membership Affairs branch. That group decides all athlete eligibility issues. I work in the enforcement side and we investigate and deal with institutional responsibilities, boosters, coaches, administrators. I don’t go and talk to them. If issues come up that’s one thing. (The compliance offices) understand there are different processes in play. Those discussions, if they have questions, comments, support, or concerns, would be directed towards our Academic and Membership affairs group.


This is what I was trying to remember and where my answer was derived from. This was in response to a question about the controversy surrounding OSU players cleared to play in the Sugar Bowl and Cam Newton being cleared.
This post was edited on 7/14/11 at 10:07 am
Posted by AUnite
The Tragic City
Member since Nov 2010
14828 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:11 am to
So why did Chizik feel the need to act like Billy Badass in the meeting?
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
31904 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:13 am to
quote:

I'm more worried why Chizik decided to ask about it at that meeting.


Just a guess ~ Gene wanted a direct answer from the NCAA. Why else would he have continued to press the Newton investigation issue with Roe in a public forum?

He wanted a definitive answer, no pussy-footin around about it. It's affecting his recruiting, because he and his coaches are more than likely having to field questions about it from recruits, parents, etc.

I honestly think Chizik thought and believed that the Cam issue was wrapped up last year.

Well, he pressed Roe too far and she obviously felt the need to give him a direct answer regarding the investigation.

Not sure Gene wanted the answer she gave, but a least he knows now, and so does Jacobs.
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81621 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:14 am to
Chizik had to act like Cartman in front of the whole school and Wendy beat him down.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
54361 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 10:15 am to
he wanted a direct answer, if he was worried about something then he wouldnt have said something in front of everyone else


odds are he is frustrated that the ncaa takes their sweet time with everything they do
Jump to page
Page First 24 25 26 27 28 ... 52
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 26 of 52Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter