Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/15/25 at 11:10 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
If you consider a dynasty winning 3 championships in 5 years, you left out Alabama 1933-1937. Bama was SEC champions in 1933, 1934, & 1937.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 12:45 am to Violent Hip Swivel
Posted on 12/16/25 at 1:13 am to Uga Alum
quote:
LSU really hasn’t sustained success throughout their football history.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 6:08 am to remaster916
quote:
Bama 09-23
Yep. That 2010 year was magical.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 6:22 am to captdalton
quote:
Nobody gives a shite what you think. Once you realize that the happier it will make everyone.
I'd be a lot more convinced if you all wouldn't respond to the post. The fact that you took time says you at least gave one small turd if not more.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 6:24 am to jatebe
That 71-79 stretch for Bama with no conference championship ties is pretty impressive.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 8:08 am to theballguy
quote:
No one ever will
Well, there is Princeton and Yale with 28 and 27.
You could argue they don't count because they were not AP named, but then you would have to say that 1925,1926,1930,1934,1941 and 1973 do not count for Alabama.
Then the AP poll was released before Bowl games until 1968, which throws 1964 into doubt.
I have seen many Alabama fans claim Georgia's 1942 title does not count because they were not AP named champions, even thought they were consensus National Champions. Fair enough. If we only count AP named titles, then Alabama has 12 they can count.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 8:25 am to Violent Hip Swivel
quote:
It's all subjective, but I consider a dynasty to be 3 championships in 5 years.
Hince the debates: all depends on a person’s individual definition.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 8:29 am to Violent Hip Swivel
quote:?
Ole Miss – 1960 through 1963
Not understanding this. LSU beat Ole Miss in 1961 and was co-champ of the conference with Bama.
And it's a long time ago, but LSU did win back-to-back conference championships in 1935-36.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 8:33 am to Violent Hip Swivel
quote:
Alabama – 2012 through 2023
Nope. The 2009 SECCG was epic. Florida was going for its 3rd national championship in 4 years, its first undefeated season, and they brought everyone back to get it done. BAMA winning the SEC was the official start of the BAMA dynasty, the complete changing of the guard. 2009-2023.
Frankly, given that BAMA won the SEC in 2020, 21, 23, and played in the SECCG in 25 might well indicate no one should be in a big hurry to suggest BAMA won't dominate the Roaring Twenties. I mean, other than SEC hubris. But then, that's hardly science or fact.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 9:20 am to makersmark1
quote:
True, but they have a rich history with several decades of success.
Wilkinson
Switzer
Stoops
All 3 had Big8/12 dynasties
The thread title specifies SEC.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 9:35 am to Violent Hip Swivel
lol.. i'm not sure 87-89 really counts as a dynasty..
Posted on 12/16/25 at 10:30 am to bamameister
quote:
no one should be in a big hurry to suggest BAMA won't dominate the Roaring Twenties
That'd basically be predicting multpiple national championshps for Alabama in the next 4 years, so good luck with that.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 10:56 am to Uga Alum
Ok. I’m gonna burn all my LSU memorabilia because the program has never had a dominate era. The program is a top 12 program all time . I was OK with that but you just set me straight. I guess I needed to hear it.
But damn! 2019 was FUN !!
But damn! 2019 was FUN !!
Posted on 12/16/25 at 11:46 am to Violent Hip Swivel
Conference dynasties… 
This sad.
This sad.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 11:49 am to Violent Hip Swivel
Georgia could very well have Bamas trophy case. They are gaining every year. And with Saban gone and Kirby not yet 50 the sky is the limit
Posted on 12/16/25 at 11:52 am to SaturdayNAthens
Yeah…call me when he gets 6natties…
Or I dk .500 vs Alabama
Or I dk .500 vs Alabama
This post was edited on 12/16/25 at 11:52 am
Posted on 12/16/25 at 11:54 am to Violent Hip Swivel
quote:
That'd basically be predicting multpiple national championshps for Alabama in the next 4 years, so good luck with that.
The thread was, and is, concerning SEC dynasties. That would have very little to do with the number of NCs that result.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 12:15 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
There are only two dynasties in the SEC:
Bear's
Saban's
One could make the argument for Spurrier, and Neyland would almost assuredly have had one if not for the war.
These three year stretches are hardly dynasties.
Bear's
Saban's
One could make the argument for Spurrier, and Neyland would almost assuredly have had one if not for the war.
These three year stretches are hardly dynasties.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News