Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/18/12 at 5:37 pm to MedDawg
quote:
The Annar Rankings are calculated by comparing yardage statistics (yards per game, yards per rush attempt, yards per pass attempt, etc.) of each team with the average yardage statistics from their opponents defense and comparing these numbers recursively until all teams are "connected". The Annar Rankings do not care who won the game, what the score was, turnovers, injuries, game location or special teams play. The rankings aren't a list of who the best football teams are from top to bottom but rather a list of what teams consistently outperform their opponents (and their opponents' opponents, etc.) average yardage stats.
Posted on 1/18/12 at 5:39 pm to MedDawg
quote:Awesome.
The Annar Rankings do not care who won the game, what the score was, turnovers, injuries, game location or special teams play.
This post was edited on 1/18/12 at 5:39 pm
Posted on 1/18/12 at 5:40 pm to MedDawg
quote:
86 Auburn
legit.
Posted on 1/18/12 at 5:51 pm to MedDawg
quote:
27) Arkansas State
quote:
35) Arkansas
Mother of god.
Posted on 1/18/12 at 11:20 pm to 870Hog
And people thought Gus Malzahn was jumping ship... looks like he upgraded if you look at these rankings. 
Posted on 1/18/12 at 11:38 pm to LSU316
quote:
your thread title is misleading this is not even a computer poll that is included in the BCS system.....so it is definitely not indicative of the "final 2011 cfb computer ranking
Calm down swamptard he never claimed it was a "BCS 2011 Computer Ranking", just a final 2011 College football computer ranking. The rankings were done by a computer so the title is correct. It's not misleading your'e just stupid.
This post was edited on 1/19/12 at 9:24 am
Posted on 1/18/12 at 11:44 pm to THEBEARLIVES
quote:
your just stupid.
Posted on 1/19/12 at 1:28 am to bamascott2
quote:
I think that site is legit...LSU did look like a #11 team last week!
Shut up. We get it pods. Y'all won.
Posted on 1/19/12 at 1:59 am to MedDawg
That's one stupid computer.
This post was edited on 1/19/12 at 2:05 am
Posted on 1/19/12 at 2:28 am to WDE24
quote:
Awesome.
Dude. The Annar computer takes what it wants!
This post was edited on 1/19/12 at 2:32 am
Posted on 1/19/12 at 7:49 am to bamascott2
Idiot posters gonna be idiot posters
Posted on 1/19/12 at 7:54 am to 2007lsuno1
I like this system. They should all work this way
Posted on 1/19/12 at 8:19 am to MedDawg
Seems legit.
Posted on 1/19/12 at 8:23 am to starkag
quote:
I like this system. They should all work this way
Posted on 1/19/12 at 8:35 am to 2007lsuno1
2011=86
2012
2012
Posted on 1/19/12 at 8:38 am to Herman Frisco
quote:
2011=86
2012
Prolly at least in the bottom tier no doubt
Posted on 1/19/12 at 9:59 am to Stonehog
computer ranking has the SEC as the second best conference.
Posted on 1/19/12 at 10:15 am to LSU316
That may possibly be the absolute worst ranking system. Who actually thought of a ranking system that doesn't take head to head matchups into consideration?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News