Started By
Message
re: Chances for major violations against LSU, Bama and Auburn from SWATS debacle
Posted on 2/3/13 at 8:17 am to ipodking
Posted on 2/3/13 at 8:17 am to ipodking
quote:
As usual Bama will get away with it while LSU and Auburn get hammered
Is that how it goes? I've never noticed that before. Could you help me please, by citing an example or two?
Posted on 2/3/13 at 8:52 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Considering I've never met you and I never refer to you specifically in my posts I'm not sure where you get that you have a "history" with me. You do seem to take my comments which aren't directed at anyone specifically personally for some reason though.
Posted on 2/3/13 at 10:56 am to thefloydian
the floydian:
Thought this was banned by the NCAA though - and not the bracelets and other stuff.
Thought this was banned by the NCAA though - and not the bracelets and other stuff.
This post was edited on 2/3/13 at 10:58 am
Posted on 2/3/13 at 9:01 pm to tampajoe
Food for thought? Has anyone else looked at the S.W.A.T.S. website? I just noticed that a former ole miss player and current ole miss coach has made an endorsement of S.W.A.T.S. May need to add them to the list, just saying.
Posted on 2/3/13 at 9:13 pm to Omahareb
didn't AU already get looked at for the bracelets? i dont think we ingested anything
Posted on 2/3/13 at 9:24 pm to 10888bge
You forgot to add Ole Miss and UGA to the death march.
It's a good thing they announced it cures ALS too.
It's a good thing they announced it cures ALS too.
This post was edited on 2/3/13 at 9:28 pm
Posted on 2/3/13 at 9:24 pm to Govt Tide
quote:
The idea that Alabama somehow gets away with anything NCAA violation related is so stupid that it's not even funny. The crying from Auburn fans about getting special treatment from the NCAA is so ridiculous and hypocritical considering Alabama has been on probation numerous times the last 18 years and got busted for frickin free textbooks. Nebraska did the exact same thing Alabama did and got nothing and didn't even have to vacate any football wins. Meanwhile, the NCAA and SEC loophole Auburn out of trouble with Cam Newton not even missing a game. 4 Auburn players openly admit taking illegal benefits from Auburn boosters yet nothing happens. Who is getting away with cheating again?
Just fricking WOW...Do you have nightmares about Cam every single night?
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:03 am to 10888bge
quote:
Al.com article
The above article points out some rule infractions that could have the NCAA knocking on LSU, Bama and Auburn's door. I don't know whether or not to believe what the two owners are saying. They seem to contradict themselves from interview to interview.
The problem is that story is written by Kevin Scarbinsky, who would have a hard time making it as a Wal-Mart greeter should he ever lose his al.com job.
He only survives by alternately rustling the jimmies of Auburn and Alabama fans. He does seriously bad work.
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:06 am to 10888bge
quote:0%
LSU
quote:0%
Auburn
quote:99% - they may be able to buy their way out though.
Bama
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:11 am to WDE24
Auburn Connection... We used the Chips which are not banned... Now some of the other stuff is banned, but Auburn did not use that...
They are called “chips” — tiny holographic patches worn on the skin at Chinese acupuncture points that, according to the company that supplied them to Etheridge, Sports With Alternatives To Steroids (S.W.A.T.S.), help the body maintain and replenish its energy supply.
If S.W.A.T.S. sounds familiar to you, it should. The company’s founder, Mitch Ross, has been in the news recently for another of his controversial products — The Ultimate Spray. It’s a supplement supposedly made from deer velvet antler which is touted to contain a growth hormone banned by every major professional sports league. Ross had ties to several coaches in the NFL and many players, but the league recently informed them they had to end their relationships with the supplement company.
But his other major product, these chips, have not been touted as containing any banned substance, and that’s what Etheridge says he used during his rehabilitation. When he was first injured, tearing ligaments in his neck and cracking his fifth vertebrae while making a tackle, doctors didn’t know if he’d ever take the field again. Eight months later, he was cleared to play. He credits the chips, in part, for his quick recovery.
They are called “chips” — tiny holographic patches worn on the skin at Chinese acupuncture points that, according to the company that supplied them to Etheridge, Sports With Alternatives To Steroids (S.W.A.T.S.), help the body maintain and replenish its energy supply.
If S.W.A.T.S. sounds familiar to you, it should. The company’s founder, Mitch Ross, has been in the news recently for another of his controversial products — The Ultimate Spray. It’s a supplement supposedly made from deer velvet antler which is touted to contain a growth hormone banned by every major professional sports league. Ross had ties to several coaches in the NFL and many players, but the league recently informed them they had to end their relationships with the supplement company.
But his other major product, these chips, have not been touted as containing any banned substance, and that’s what Etheridge says he used during his rehabilitation. When he was first injured, tearing ligaments in his neck and cracking his fifth vertebrae while making a tackle, doctors didn’t know if he’d ever take the field again. Eight months later, he was cleared to play. He credits the chips, in part, for his quick recovery.
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:20 am to 10888bge
quote:
But on your side of the ball that Cam farce was disgraceful.
Even after all this time, still so deliciously mad.

Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:29 am to beatbammer
The owner of the deer horn shop said he gave auburn players the chips and patches.(gave).
He also said that one of the barners did spray his product under both arms. Does that count?
He also said that one of the barners did spray his product under both arms. Does that count?

Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:32 am to Herman Frisco
quote:
The owner of the deer horn shop said he gave auburn players the chips and patches.(gave).
Did he say something else? something you might be leaving out here? something like "gave" could mean something like "gave" it to them after someone "purchased" them. I know its hard to understand but "gave" doesnt always mean to give something for free
Nice to see you in an Auburn thread again
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:40 am to NYCAuburn
Just trying to do my part.
Ps, gave means gave.
Ps, gave means gave.
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:42 am to Herman Frisco
quote:yes, but you are presenting it as gave meaning gave for free, like I asked, are you leaving something out here? I know you ATPB'ers are simple folk and have a hard time seeing a broad scope when you have your mind narrowed
Ps, gave means gave
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:50 am to NYCAuburn
What do you not understand about gave? Gave means gave. He gave them his product.
Now do you see what I am saying?

Now do you see what I am saying?
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:50 am to ipodking
LSU and Abarn should be use to getting hammered on the field by Bama, hence nothing new.
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:51 am to Herman Frisco
quote:
What do you not understand about gave? Gave means gave. He gave them his product. Now do you see what I am saying?
did he give it to them for free?
Back to top
