Started By
Message
re: Case for a National Seed: Auburn vs LSU
Posted on 5/26/25 at 4:47 pm to MetryTyger
Posted on 5/26/25 at 4:47 pm to MetryTyger
quote:
'99% of LSU fans on this site.' ???? So, you took a poll and did marketing demographic research on every LSU fan on this site ???
I have absolutely no clue what you are talking about. I never said anything about 99% of LSU fans being anything.
1
Posted on 5/26/25 at 4:52 pm to terd ferguson
quote:
You gonna cry?
about being the 4 seed? Nah, I'm good.
Just talking shite back to the LSU fans that have been talking shite for days. You want in this back and forth?
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:01 pm to FredbullTN
quote:
and you are the little kid on the playground playing the flute
I asked you to quit whining after getting what you want, not describe your wet dream to me
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:03 pm to Adventure Junkie
quote:um this board would be dead without this sort of thing
not describe your wet dream to me
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:20 pm to Adventure Junkie
quote:
I asked you to quit whining after getting what you want, not describe your wet dream to me
this is foreplay
this thread is my wet dream
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:36 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
weren't you one of the ones that said LSU would absolutely be a higher seed? Yes you were.
Youve got the wrong guy, champ.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:39 pm to AUTiger789
Getting a national seed is great and makes the road to Omaha much easier and both teams earned it. Will be interesting to see if LSU can use it towards their 8th National Championship or if Auburn can make their 7th CWS appearance, and maybe get to the Championship series.
This post was edited on 5/26/25 at 5:40 pm
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:42 pm to AUTiger789
quote:
You people are ridiculous. You arrogantly proclaimed that there was no way Auburn would be seeded higher than LSU. This thread is full of LSU fans proclaiming LSU would be seeded higher…. RPI is basically meaningless… the SEC standings is all that matters… LSU would always get the benefit of the doubt over Auburn because of its “brand”… Auburn fans don’t understand how all this works… Multiple said Auburn would be traveling on the road… and several said they couldn’t wait to bookmark this thread and revisit it after LSU was seeded higher. I come back to point out I was right and you were wrong, and you cry like whiny babies when it gets shoved back in your face. I was wrong only about one thing: I severely underestimated my Auburn Tigers. For that, I apologize to the entire Rant community. I was correct that LSU had the 6th best resume in the conference, but I was wrong to assume that Auburn would be 5th. That turned out to be Georgia. In the end, RPI did end up being the most reliable metric to project the National Seeds. The Top 7 RPI teams all received national seeds with LSU being the only exception of a team outside the RPI Top 8. The SEC standings were not as important as you people tried to pretend they would be. Turns out beating up on Mizzou didn’t count the same for playing the top teams. Series wins etc turned out to not be much of a factor, with Tennessee getting a regional host despite being 4-6 in SEC series. Basically all the metrics you LSU fans arrogantly proclaimed to know would be the most valued by the committee were not much of a factor, and all the things Auburn fans pointed out to be a big deal ended up being a bigger deal than even we had thought. I’m sorry you people got your feelings hurt and were exposed to not be the experts you were in your mind.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:54 pm to im4LSU
quote:
Youve got the wrong guy, champ.
I posted your quote.
quote:
"The problem is, all of these guys are hung up on comparing solely against LSU for some reason when multiple people have told them they need to be looking elsewhere for a fight. They want to be able to look at all of it in a vacuum and that’s just not the case".
very first post
ETA You have other gems in that thread
This post was edited on 5/26/25 at 5:55 pm
Posted on 5/26/25 at 6:01 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
I posted your quote.
I don’t see where he said LSU would be the higher seed. You are looking kind of foolish right now.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 6:13 pm to FredbullTN
quote:
I don’t see where he said LSU would be the higher seed. You are looking kind of foolish right now.
Your reading comprehension sucks then.
He said Auburn should not be comparing their resume with LSU's. They should be looking somewhere else...........word for word.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 6:16 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
Your reading comprehension sucks then. He said Auburn should not be comparing their resume with LSU's. They should be looking somewhere else...........word for word.
The thread was started by an Auburn fan comparing LSU saying we are 6th on the totem pole. LSU fans then provided counter arguments saying he was wrong (which he was). Pointing out singular posts is dumb because the whole premise of the thread was dumb. As correctly pointed out by many LSU fans lol. It was never a fight between Auburn and LSU for a top 8.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 6:20 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
quote: weren't you one of the ones that said LSU would absolutely be a higher seed? Yes you were.
That is what you said dipshit. He said “you have the wrong guy” and then you proceeded to post some other shite that has nothing to do with what you were claiming. You haven’t shown where he said that LSU would be the higher seed. My reading comprehension skills are just fine. You don’t even understand what you are trying to prove.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 6:22 pm to vidtiger23
quote:
The thread was started by an Auburn fan comparing LSU saying we are 6th on the totem pole.
Can anybody at LSU read? That thread was started by a Texas fan saying where he thought the seeding would go.
ITT and that thread................
Auburn fans pointed out that Auburn's SOS was #1 vs. LSU's 53rd.
Auburn fans pointed out that Auburn's RPI is #3 as opposed to LSU' #10.
LSU fans wanted to point out record.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 6:24 pm to vidtiger23
You are too stupid to grasp the meaning of words. I am done with you. He said word for word that Auburn had no case against LSU. Auburn needed to pick somebody else to compare resumes against.
ETA sorry vid. This post was not directed at you. It was directed at FredbullTN
ETA sorry vid. This post was not directed at you. It was directed at FredbullTN
quote:
That is what you said dipshit. He said “you have the wrong guy” and then you proceeded to post some other shite that has nothing to do with what you were claiming.
This post was edited on 5/26/25 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 5/26/25 at 6:24 pm to AUTiger789
This thread aged well. Auburn ahead of LSU in national seeding. 
Posted on 5/26/25 at 6:32 pm to AUtigerNOLA
quote:
This thread aged well. Auburn ahead of LSU in national seeding.
Both Top 8. All that matters lol
Posted on 5/26/25 at 6:36 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
Can anybody at LSU read? That thread was started by a Texas fan saying where he thought the seeding would go.
I was referring to this thread. Which was started by an Auburn fan comparing LSU and Auburn’s resumes and was quickly pointed out that it didn’t matter as both would be top 8. If there is another thread out there I am behind the 8 ball on that one and don’t remember it.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 6:41 pm to vidtiger23
The OP asked why LSU should get a higher seed than Auburn? I don't see where he said LSU should not be an 8 seed. I think he was just comparing resumes.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 6:48 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
The OP asked why LSU should get a higher seed than Auburn?
The OP’s entire premise was that the SEC wouldn’t get 6 top 8s. That was wrong. And if it did come down to it, it would be down to LSU and Auburn for the last top 8 from the SEC, also wrong. He said Texas was the clear #1. Wrong. He said Texas, Vandy, Arkansas, and UGA were the clear 1-4. Also wrong.
Then he spent pages upon pages telling us essentially why Auburn should be a top 8 over LSU in this made up and inevitably wrong hypothetical. LSU fans largely said it didn’t matter because both would and should be top 8 seeds.
He also kept screaming RPI. Well, the final 1-8 RPI looks like this
1 Vandy
2 UGA
3 Auburn
4 Texas
5 Arkansas
6 UNC
7 Oregon St
8 Coastal
9 Clemson
10 LSU
11 Tennessee
12 Ole Miss
13 Alabama
14 FSU
15 UCLA
16 Oregon
The 16 seeds were actually
1 Vandy (1)
2 Texas (4)
3 Arkansas (5)
4 Auburn (3)
5 UNC (6)
6 LSU (10)
7 UGA (2)
8 Oregon St (7)
9 FSU (14)
10 Ole Miss (12)
11 Clemson (9)
12 Oregon (16)
13 Coastal (8)
14 Tennessee (11)
15 UCLA (15)
16 Southern Miss (19)
This post was edited on 5/26/25 at 7:00 pm
Page 17 of 20
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News