Started By
Message
re: **Cam Newton investigation UPDATED Page 1 - 11/5, 1:30am**
Posted on 11/5/10 at 11:08 am to sandjunky
Posted on 11/5/10 at 11:08 am to sandjunky
quote:
Auburn is risking EVERYTHING by ignoring these allegations and I hope they make the right choice
Auburn has known about these allegations since June. Apparently Cecil Newton also had to turn over church financial statements in June also. If Auburn was worried about Cam's eligiblty then he never would have taken a snap at Auburn. Shouldn't the NCAA have ruled on Cam before the season started? (In private of course.Not that we would have known how they ruled.)
1
Posted on 11/5/10 at 11:09 am to chadau79
quote:
If Auburn was worried about Cam's eligiblty then he never would have taken a snap at Auburn. Shouldn't the NCAA have ruled on Cam before the season started? (In private of course.Not that we would have known how they ruled.)
I think they did and decided this wasn't true then new evidence came to their attention.
Posted on 11/5/10 at 11:13 am to adammwilson
quote:
I think they did and decided this wasn't true then new evidence came to their attention.
Lack of institutional control. They should have done a more thorough job investigating.
Posted on 11/5/10 at 11:14 am to Choctaw Hog
Kenny Bell b a roads skolla, u alrdy kno.....
Posted on 11/5/10 at 11:16 am to m2pro
quote:cajun lingo..
2 b honest I hope cam newton do get 2 play cuz da game want b interesting so wen we win it want b no excuses like Texas but I c he scared alot of pple smh wat happen 2 loyalty.....kb7
Posted on 11/5/10 at 11:17 am to m2pro
Copy and pasted, bruh
Posted on 11/5/10 at 11:21 am to Cheetah Flex
Whats bad about this, is the SEC first got news of this back in January, and didntpass the info to the NCAA until last month. The NCAA is just getting started.
im sure there will tons of theories as to why the SEC sat onthis for 8-9 months.
im sure there will tons of theories as to why the SEC sat onthis for 8-9 months.
This post was edited on 11/5/10 at 11:22 am
Posted on 11/5/10 at 11:23 am to alabamabuckeye
Yes, but the NCAA had this info in June also. I am sure that they would not have let Cam play if his eligibilty was in doubt. Look at the boat trip with Ingram and Jones. They did not find out they could play until the day before the first game, but the NCAA did at least make a ruling.
Posted on 11/5/10 at 11:24 am to BobBoucher
I think the bottom line will be this:
Does the Newton family have any ties to this Kenny Rogers?
If it can be shown there is no connection, then Kenny Rogers acted alone and should be punished. Nothing will happen to Cam.
If the Newtons were involved with Rogers, then the NCAA digs further.
Does the Newton family have any ties to this Kenny Rogers?
If it can be shown there is no connection, then Kenny Rogers acted alone and should be punished. Nothing will happen to Cam.
If the Newtons were involved with Rogers, then the NCAA digs further.
Posted on 11/5/10 at 11:24 am to TT9
quote:
I c he scared alot of pple smh wat happen 2 loyalty.....kb7
Fig Newton scared the rest of the SEC, so people squealed on him? Whatever happened to loyalty?
Posted on 11/5/10 at 11:44 am to alange
How much did Auburn pay Jordan Jefferson to go to LSU?
Posted on 11/5/10 at 11:45 am to Fewer Kilometers
Not sure but it was worth every penny
Posted on 11/5/10 at 11:46 am to Bankshot
quote:
I think the bottom line will be this:
Does the Newton family have any ties to this Kenny Rogers?
If it can be shown there is no connection, then Kenny Rogers acted alone and should be punished. Nothing will happen to Cam.
If the Newtons were involved with Rogers, then the NCAA digs further.
Its already been established that the Newtons have had contact with Rogers going back to his Florida days... so multiple times spanning several year.
I dont recall where i read that though.
Posted on 11/5/10 at 11:46 am to Fewer Kilometers
quote:
How much did Auburn pay Jordan Jefferson to go to LSU?
about tree fiddy!!!
Posted on 11/5/10 at 11:54 am to BobBoucher
quote:
Its already been established that the Newtons have had contact with Rogers going back to his Florida days... so multiple times spanning several year.
I dont recall where i read that though.
I heard it on ESPN.
Posted on 11/5/10 at 11:58 am to TigerNAtux
quote:
Lack of institutional control.
Magic words
________________________
The Aubies are waking up to day two realizing they have a brand new role to play now. They are the fiddler on the Titanic.
Posted on 11/5/10 at 12:05 pm to chadau79
quote:
Yes, but the NCAA had this info in June also. I am sure that they would not have let Cam play if his eligibilty was in doubt
Like with Reggie Bush?
Did the NCAA stop the UNC players from playing us? No, the team did.
Posted on 11/5/10 at 12:25 pm to igoringa
Here is my question about the whole thing (and excuse me if this has been posted before I didn't feel like reading 40+ pages).
Based on what I have been reading, MSU and other schools were recruiting Newton. Rogers calls Bond and tells him other schools have offered up $200k but MSU could get Newton for $180k. Bond tells this to the MSU AD and while they do not pay, they continue to recruit Newton as they would any other player. Do I have that part of the story correct?
If that is correct, and any connection to Rogers wuld make Newton inelligible to play, why did MSU continue to recruit him? In turning the information over to the SEC did they talk to the Newtons to see what was going on? Did they receive some type of information to make them think that this would not hurt his elligibility?
Just seems strange to me that if Mullen/MSU AD felt that Newton was damaged goods they would continue to recruit him.
Based on what I have been reading, MSU and other schools were recruiting Newton. Rogers calls Bond and tells him other schools have offered up $200k but MSU could get Newton for $180k. Bond tells this to the MSU AD and while they do not pay, they continue to recruit Newton as they would any other player. Do I have that part of the story correct?
If that is correct, and any connection to Rogers wuld make Newton inelligible to play, why did MSU continue to recruit him? In turning the information over to the SEC did they talk to the Newtons to see what was going on? Did they receive some type of information to make them think that this would not hurt his elligibility?
Just seems strange to me that if Mullen/MSU AD felt that Newton was damaged goods they would continue to recruit him.
Posted on 11/5/10 at 12:30 pm to PJinAtl
Do any of you ever remember the media flipping out ilke this, with as little info as they have? I mean seriously, the journalists and analysts are as bad as the message boards.
Page 48 of 54
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News