Started By
Message

re: BREAKING - LSU fills their two remaining roster spots, no NFL players - Sankey wins

Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:35 pm to
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
75082 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

An SEC team is legally allowed to do so, they'll simply pay the fine that's levied by the bylaws they voted for.


Sounds good to say, that will eventually fall though.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
15800 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

Sounds good to say, that will eventually fall though.


If a court can tell a private organization - that isn't violating laws or protected status designations - how to operate its own organization ... well you're talking about a landmark case.

Do not see it.
Posted by RIPMachoMan
Member since Jun 2011
9555 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

Except the rules have changed a lot.


They know… they are just in denial to pile on
Posted by RIPMachoMan
Member since Jun 2011
9555 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

that isn't violating laws


TBD
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
75082 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

If a court can tell a private organization - that isn't violating laws or protected status designations - how to operate its own organization ... well you're talking about a landmark case.

Do not see it.


It gets into different territory when a private organization starts colluding against athletes to limit their earnings.

If the P4 conferences operate in lock step with the NCAA, as with this case, they're effectively an arm of the NCAA.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
24130 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

Because baseball players don't declare for the MLB draft.

My understanding is that none of these players did either. They were ruled "eligibility complete", and entered into the draft pool for that reason.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
15800 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

It gets into different territory when a private organization starts colluding against athletes to limit their earnings.


There's no collusion here. Collusion requires intent to defraud or decieve.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
78312 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

If a court can tell a private organization - that isn't violating laws or protected status designations - how to operate its own organization ... well you're talking about a landmark case.
In a few years, I expect this door to be wide open.

Especially as conferences change.

If all of the conferences come together to make a rule preventing this, how does that work when it comes to collusion between entities and the concept of “monopoly”?

This all was inevitable when the first lawsuit passed.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
15800 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

TBD


Seriously, though, what law? An injunction is not law, nor did the SEC violate the injunction.
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
75082 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

There's no collusion here. Collusion requires intent to defraud or decieve.


What do you think is happening here?
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
15800 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

If all of the conferences come together to make a rule preventing this, how does that work when it comes to collusion between entities and the concept of “monopoly”?


What makes this extremely dicey is that the schools and the conferences are not paying this money. Private entities are.

Fundamentally it's like me suing Paramount because they haven't cast me in a blockbuster, costing me millions in endorsement money.

I have to prove two things: 1) that I actually could have made that money and, critically, 2) that there was no other avenue for me to do so, that these organization(s) worked in congress to deny my potential earnings

That's much harder than the NCAA cases, and worth noting that the NCAA barely put up a fight.
Posted by Thamma513
Member since Apr 2026
91 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:47 pm to
Depth is nice. Hype is more powerful. I think it was a win win regardless of outcome. Those guys aren't playing and no rules were broken. LSU football is the most popular talking point in the game atm and Sankey is dumb af. We will see what happens tomorrow and Thursday but the argument that the halftime comment was a breach or displayed lack of control is laughable
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
15800 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

What do you think is happening here?


If you have a case of fraud to show, please do so.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
78312 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:50 pm to
quote:

1) that I actually could have made that money and, critically, 2) that there was no other avenue for me to do so, that these organization(s) worked in congress to deny my potential earnings
That isn’t really a high bar in the current college sports environment.

Look, all I am saying is that, if you went back 10 years and told me that this is what college sports would like today, I would have told you that there wasn’t a chance in hell of this happening.
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8952 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:50 pm to
LSU is soft
Posted by Othello
the Neptonian Steel Mines
Member since Aug 2013
25179 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:53 pm to
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
75082 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:55 pm to
quote:

If you have a case of fraud to show, please do so.


The NCAA and its member conferences are attempting to circumvent court rulings by forcing penalties on member institutions if they sign certain individuals, effectively barring those individuals from the market.

It's why 5 for 5 will eventually be struck down. None of this is based on any law, it's just tradition and whimsy.
Posted by Drewbie
tFlagship
Member since Jun 2012
67351 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

It's why 5 for 5 will eventually be struck down. None of this is based on any law, it's just tradition and whimsy.
Because it makes so much sense to allow people to play collegiate sports for 10 years as long as they're a "student".
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 11:26 pm
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
78312 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:26 pm to
quote:

Right, because it makes so much sense to allow people to play collegiate sports for 10 years as long as they're a "student".
No one says it makes sense or is right, but it is the legal system we live in.

It has been determined that you cannot restrict these players.

People wanted to blow up the old system, well, this is the outcome.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 11:26 pm
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
15800 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:31 pm to
quote:

The NCAA and its member conferences are attempting to circumvent court rulings by forcing penalties


1) It's an injunction. It's saying "hold while we figure this out"

2) The NCAA is not a party to any of this
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter