Started By
Message

re: Bowls prove Stanford should have been 4th playoff seed.

Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:16 pm to
Posted by Taurus 357
Great Lakes Gambler
Member since Dec 2014
3916 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:16 pm to
Sullivan being stupid again. Stanford lost to a Big Ten team, fagg0t.
Posted by dbuchanon
Member since Nov 2014
19837 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:17 pm to
Maybe that loss to NW gave them pause. NW was blown off the field 3 times this yr
This post was edited on 1/3/16 at 1:18 pm
Posted by Tigerman97
Member since Jun 2014
10354 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:26 pm to
The 2 losses. Losses have to mean something.
Posted by dbuchanon
Member since Nov 2014
19837 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:29 pm to
That too

But losing to a team that was blanked by Iowa and Michigan by 30 plus killed their chances at being a final 4 team
Posted by americanrealism
Smoking an 8th in the multiverse
Member since Nov 2012
1515 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:29 pm to
quote:


I could not believe they put Oklahoma in.


Hindsight is 20/20.

OU closed out the season on a hot streak and that's what got them in. They beat the top Big-12 teams which we now know were not that good. Less than a week ago people were acting like it would take a miracle for Clemson to beat Oklahoma.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13342 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:45 pm to
4 team playoff is going to create this. You have 4 spots for 5 conferences, leaving one out every year. They should start by assessing which conference is the weakest, eliminating the champion of that conference. Shitty deal for an undefeated conference champion, but strength of schedule has to count for something.

People would say this is an SEC thing, but the SEC still gets the shitty end of the stick, even after this is done. In any given year, there is going to be 1 or 2 teams in the final 4 that would lose convincingly to #2 or #3 in the SEC. Anyone think Ole Miss doesn't beat Chokelahoma or Michigan State this year?

Many of those ignoring strength of schedule and saying 2 losses is pretty much an automatic elimination are going to be pissed when it is used to keep the SEC out of the final 4. We beat on each other all year, it is bound to happen. Just like it did to the PAC12 this year.

Playoff needs to expand to 8 teams, and the sooner the better.
Posted by MeatPants
Member since Nov 2015
8853 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:47 pm to
That's crap about assessing the weakest conference. Because in general people. Are wrong about that

You might as well leave out Kentucky of the NCAA tournament or definitely a number one seed then every year because they play in a horrible basketball conference
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65051 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Michigan St/Iowa were bigger pretenders than OU..

We probably should have been looking at

1) Clemson
2) Alabama
3) Oklahoma
4) Ohio St


How can you put OSU over Michigan State when MSU beat OSU, with a back-up playing QB, in the Horseshoe?
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13342 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

NCAA tournament


Apples and oranges. 65>4
Posted by MeatPants
Member since Nov 2015
8853 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:59 pm to
Not for number one seeds. 4=4


Kentucky should never get a number one seed. Ever


Going by that logic
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33937 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 2:04 pm to
Two loss teams should be forbidden from being in a four team playoff unless it's a crazy year like 2007. And outside of that '07 LSU team and 1990 Miami, I have yet to see a two-loss team that looked like the best team in college football in a given year.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13342 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 2:04 pm to
Why would a #1 seed matter much in a 65 team tournament? #65 still has the opportunity to win it all, don't they?
Posted by Pelican fan99
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Jun 2013
34709 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 2:06 pm to
nope. they had two losses they eliminated themselves. I'd hate to see 2 loss teams getting in unless it is unavoidable.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13342 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 2:11 pm to
So the team with the weakest conference always gets a shot at the NC. Brilliant.
Posted by JCdawg
Member since Sep 2014
7797 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

So the team with the weakest conference always gets a shot at the NC. Brilliant.




Exactly. I guess Oklahoma gets a pass every year...

And the Pac-12 needs to drop back to 8 conference games, and Stanford should stop scheduling Notre Dame and start scheduling Rice and Tulsa. I swear there is no logic anymore. Ohio State didn't win their conference period, out. Stanford won arguably the second best conference in college football while playing 9 conference games and two quality out of conference teams, and a conference championship.

What is Oklahoma's record in BCS and New Years 6 games?

4-6, with their most recent wins Alabama and Uconn, and several bad losses in those games.
This post was edited on 1/3/16 at 2:28 pm
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26957 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

Pac-12 is vastly superior to the Big 12 top to bottom.


This is beyond stupid.

Oregon and Utah split against Michigan and MSU.

USC lost to Wisconsin. UCLA lost to a 5-7 Nebraska. What does that hindsight say about your fricking Pac-12? Not the mention the fact that Washington State...tied for 3rd best conference record...lost to fricking Portland State.

Top it off with Stanford losing to Northwestern. A two loss Stanford getting in ahead of MSU? Hell, if the bowls proved anything, they proved that even Ohio State should go ahead of Stanford. They beat the shite out of a Notre Dame team that Stanford struggled to beat at home.
This post was edited on 1/3/16 at 2:41 pm
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26957 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

and the Big 12 hasn't performed well in bowl games for a while.


Are you actually going to sit there...allegedly with more brain cells than a turnip...and suggest that the playoff participants should be determined by how their fellow conference members performed two, three, or even four years ago?

Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26957 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

Exactly. I guess Oklahoma gets a pass every year.


I'm sorry...refresh my memory...how did Oklahoma fare in their playoff game last year?

Posted by Sebastian
Member since Jun 2015
3756 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 3:09 pm to
Because Stoops is Big Game Bob.
Posted by VivaZapata27
Natchez, Ms
Member since Apr 2013
3573 posts
Posted on 1/3/16 at 3:26 pm to
If four conference champions have one loss or less and another has two losses the two loss team is out period. That's how it should be. Even if the two loss team were SEac champ. Stanford lost what was essentially an elimination game n week one. College football has the best regular season because the playoffs begin in September.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter