Started By
Message
re: Bowls prove Stanford should have been 4th playoff seed.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:16 pm to sullivanct19a
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:16 pm to sullivanct19a
Sullivan being stupid again. Stanford lost to a Big Ten team, fagg0t.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:17 pm to JCdawg
Maybe that loss to NW gave them pause. NW was blown off the field 3 times this yr
This post was edited on 1/3/16 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:26 pm to dbuchanon
The 2 losses. Losses have to mean something.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:29 pm to Tigerman97
That too
But losing to a team that was blanked by Iowa and Michigan by 30 plus killed their chances at being a final 4 team
But losing to a team that was blanked by Iowa and Michigan by 30 plus killed their chances at being a final 4 team
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:29 pm to JCdawg
quote:
I could not believe they put Oklahoma in.
Hindsight is 20/20.
OU closed out the season on a hot streak and that's what got them in. They beat the top Big-12 teams which we now know were not that good. Less than a week ago people were acting like it would take a miracle for Clemson to beat Oklahoma.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:45 pm to JCdawg
4 team playoff is going to create this. You have 4 spots for 5 conferences, leaving one out every year. They should start by assessing which conference is the weakest, eliminating the champion of that conference. Shitty deal for an undefeated conference champion, but strength of schedule has to count for something.
People would say this is an SEC thing, but the SEC still gets the shitty end of the stick, even after this is done. In any given year, there is going to be 1 or 2 teams in the final 4 that would lose convincingly to #2 or #3 in the SEC. Anyone think Ole Miss doesn't beat Chokelahoma or Michigan State this year?
Many of those ignoring strength of schedule and saying 2 losses is pretty much an automatic elimination are going to be pissed when it is used to keep the SEC out of the final 4. We beat on each other all year, it is bound to happen. Just like it did to the PAC12 this year.
Playoff needs to expand to 8 teams, and the sooner the better.
People would say this is an SEC thing, but the SEC still gets the shitty end of the stick, even after this is done. In any given year, there is going to be 1 or 2 teams in the final 4 that would lose convincingly to #2 or #3 in the SEC. Anyone think Ole Miss doesn't beat Chokelahoma or Michigan State this year?
Many of those ignoring strength of schedule and saying 2 losses is pretty much an automatic elimination are going to be pissed when it is used to keep the SEC out of the final 4. We beat on each other all year, it is bound to happen. Just like it did to the PAC12 this year.
Playoff needs to expand to 8 teams, and the sooner the better.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:47 pm to troyt37
That's crap about assessing the weakest conference. Because in general people. Are wrong about that
You might as well leave out Kentucky of the NCAA tournament or definitely a number one seed then every year because they play in a horrible basketball conference
You might as well leave out Kentucky of the NCAA tournament or definitely a number one seed then every year because they play in a horrible basketball conference
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:51 pm to bmy
quote:
Michigan St/Iowa were bigger pretenders than OU..
We probably should have been looking at
1) Clemson
2) Alabama
3) Oklahoma
4) Ohio St
How can you put OSU over Michigan State when MSU beat OSU, with a back-up playing QB, in the Horseshoe?
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:57 pm to MeatPants
quote:
NCAA tournament
Apples and oranges. 65>4
Posted on 1/3/16 at 1:59 pm to troyt37
Not for number one seeds. 4=4
Kentucky should never get a number one seed. Ever
Going by that logic
Kentucky should never get a number one seed. Ever
Going by that logic
Posted on 1/3/16 at 2:04 pm to SammyTiger
Two loss teams should be forbidden from being in a four team playoff unless it's a crazy year like 2007. And outside of that '07 LSU team and 1990 Miami, I have yet to see a two-loss team that looked like the best team in college football in a given year.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 2:04 pm to MeatPants
Why would a #1 seed matter much in a 65 team tournament? #65 still has the opportunity to win it all, don't they?
Posted on 1/3/16 at 2:06 pm to JCdawg
nope. they had two losses they eliminated themselves. I'd hate to see 2 loss teams getting in unless it is unavoidable.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 2:11 pm to Bench McElroy
So the team with the weakest conference always gets a shot at the NC. Brilliant.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 2:25 pm to troyt37
quote:
So the team with the weakest conference always gets a shot at the NC. Brilliant.
Exactly. I guess Oklahoma gets a pass every year...
And the Pac-12 needs to drop back to 8 conference games, and Stanford should stop scheduling Notre Dame and start scheduling Rice and Tulsa. I swear there is no logic anymore. Ohio State didn't win their conference period, out. Stanford won arguably the second best conference in college football while playing 9 conference games and two quality out of conference teams, and a conference championship.
What is Oklahoma's record in BCS and New Years 6 games?
4-6, with their most recent wins Alabama and Uconn, and several bad losses in those games.
This post was edited on 1/3/16 at 2:28 pm
Posted on 1/3/16 at 2:40 pm to JCdawg
quote:
Pac-12 is vastly superior to the Big 12 top to bottom.
This is beyond stupid.
Oregon and Utah split against Michigan and MSU.
USC lost to Wisconsin. UCLA lost to a 5-7 Nebraska. What does that hindsight say about your fricking Pac-12? Not the mention the fact that Washington State...tied for 3rd best conference record...lost to fricking Portland State.
Top it off with Stanford losing to Northwestern. A two loss Stanford getting in ahead of MSU? Hell, if the bowls proved anything, they proved that even Ohio State should go ahead of Stanford. They beat the shite out of a Notre Dame team that Stanford struggled to beat at home.
This post was edited on 1/3/16 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 1/3/16 at 2:42 pm to JCdawg
quote:
and the Big 12 hasn't performed well in bowl games for a while.
Are you actually going to sit there...allegedly with more brain cells than a turnip...and suggest that the playoff participants should be determined by how their fellow conference members performed two, three, or even four years ago?
Posted on 1/3/16 at 2:46 pm to JCdawg
quote:
Exactly. I guess Oklahoma gets a pass every year.
I'm sorry...refresh my memory...how did Oklahoma fare in their playoff game last year?
Posted on 1/3/16 at 3:09 pm to JCdawg
Because Stoops is Big Game Bob.
Posted on 1/3/16 at 3:26 pm to troyt37
If four conference champions have one loss or less and another has two losses the two loss team is out period. That's how it should be. Even if the two loss team were SEac champ. Stanford lost what was essentially an elimination game n week one. College football has the best regular season because the playoffs begin in September.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News