re: Bogus National Title claims: Alabama claims 18 but most are questionable

quote:

---

3. Auburn - 2 claims, 0 are bogus. 0% bogus claims despite the push by some ignorant Auburn fans to change it.

---

Weird how the post-season games pre-70s only apply to Alabama.

How did I miss this thread all these years? Now I'm going to have to read all 101 pages. If my brain doesn't combust first.

quote:

---

Even the ncaa says Alabama has more NC than 13. That is the point.. Research, try it before posting

---

Wow. You are completely retarded.
Do you really want that to be your final answer? did you confuse my post with someone else’s?

This is why you com off as a douche and an idiot. You take about 10% of what was posted and make it 100% of what was said.

I hate to borrow a phrase from a fellow ranter, but “we are laughing at you”. I mean, you really are an idiot fueled by contempt.

quote:

---

He isn't even a real Bammer. He didn't attend school there and he has never been to Bryant-Denny Stadium.

---

I mean, he just basically created a narrative in his mind about what I said. And it was so far off it has to be a weak-as-hell troll.

But still…..I read that and said, “wow. This guy is really dumb.”

quote:

---

1) I have been to way more than 200 Alabama games, but thanks for asking

---

You're a liar. You don't drive up from Florida every week. You never have.

quote:

---

2) I have seen Alabama win 3 NCs in person, and Alabama has won more than 3 since then

---

TV doesn't count.

quote:

---

While I do have one of my degrees from the University of Alabama,

---

There is so much bullshite in that statement it is comical.

I'll ask again.

quote:

---

WTF does it matter to you, you bandwagon idiot.

You didn't go to Bama and you have never even been to a Bama game.

---

quote:

---

Wow. You are completely retarded.
Do you really want that to be your final answer? did you confuse my post with someone else’s?

This is why you com off as a douche and an idiot. You take about 10% of what was posted and make it 100% of what was said.

I hate to borrow a phrase from a fellow ranter, but “we are laughing at you”

---

I answered your question (statement). Shoot I even copied your post, yet you seem unwilling or unable to comprehend the information

I guess showing you correct information is not your style.

quote:

---

1) I have been to way more than 200 Alabama games, but thanks for asking
You're a liar. You don't drive up from Florida every week. You never have.

---

I am originally from Huntsville, but you probably can not read a map (you sure can not read information provided to you)

quote:

---

2) I have seen Alabama win 3 NCs in person, and Alabama has won more than 3 since then
TV doesn't count.

---

Awww, using my own quote back at me, how original.

quote:

---

While I do have one of my degrees from the University of Alabama,
There is so much bullshite in that statement it is comical

---

You might want to go look at why someone would live in Huntsville and also live on the Space Coast....


Really dude you probably need to stop, you are killing what little brain cells you have left.


This is so much fun, but I do feel like I am taking advantage of your disability

quote:

---

No….you didn’t.

---

Yes I did

quote:

---

Shoot I even copied your post,

---

Which I did , twice

quote:

---

I guess showing you correct information is not your style
except that you didn’t.

---

again, you can keep saying this, but people can go back and find where I did this

quote:

---

yet you seem unwilling or unable to comprehend the information


This is the funny part. Guys do this when they “. intellectually tap out”.

---

And when people are losing the argument or have nothing to add of value they say that.

Really do you even read your own posts?

quote:

---

I have PROVED you pulled 5 out of thin air, you bandwagon riding idiot.

---

You haven't proven shite other than flaunting how unabashedly ignorant you are, you cousin fricking boomer redneck. Google is your friend (have your grandson teach you how to use it). You can literally dig up vintage newspaper articles from the day after these 20s/30s title games were played to see Alabama was named "national champs".

Also, setting those facts aside, Bama had the "best record" in 1925, 1930 and 1934 (tied Stanford in the 26 Rose Bowl) and won the only bowl game that existed. So don't contradict yourself here by saying these are "illegitimate" when you use "better record" as the criteria in your other arguments...

quote:

---

1964 - AP; Coaches - Lost to Texas who Arky beat....and they had a better record

---

By your own admission, AP title. That's equivalent to saying BCS titles are illegitimate.

And Bama had a better record than the national champs in 1937, 1945, 1966 and 1974... Are you willing to apply your own logic here and crown Bama champs for these aforementioned seasons?

Also, in 1977, Notre Dame and Bama both finished the season 11-1 yet ND was awarded the AP title. But guess what? ND Lost to Ole Miss- a team that Alabama shellacked that year. So using boomer Tvalley logic, Alabama's the true champs of 1977!

quote:

---

1965 - AP - 3 teams with better records.

---

Cool. So once again using this logic, that means considering Alabama finished with a "better record" than the national champs in 1937, 1945, 1966 and 1974, we're the true champs those seasons?

1937: Alabama: 8-0-1; National champ Minnesota: 7-1

1945: Alabama 10-0; National champ Army 9-0

1966: Alabama 11-0; National Champs Notre Dame and Michigan State 9-0-1

1974: Alabama 11-1; National Champ USC 10-1-1

1977: Alabama 11-1; National champ Notre Dame 11-1 (but lost to a team Alabama blew out)

Lmao. Keep unwittingly self owning yourself, you fricking retard.

quote:

---

In 1973 they played the AP number 1 about a week after UPI gave it to them.

Who won?

---

UPI title. Awarded prior to the bowl games being played. You can't apply the standards of today to yesteryear just because it hurts your feelings.

Boy by this logic, a lot of programs are going to have to retroactively vacate AP/UPI titles because they "lost" their exhibition bowl games - despite this being the methodology of that era - simply because that system triggers snowflakes like Tvalley and his Alabama inferiority complex.

quote:

---

In 1978 Bama got beat on the field by what team?

---

AP title. Alabama jumped USC midway through the season after USC lost to mediocre Arizona State, while Alabama never lost another game.

To complete the season, number 2 Alabama defeated number 1 Penn State in the Sugar Bowl, winning the AP title. Weren't you alive when this game was played, you boomer bitch?

You should endorse this one since it was awarded after the bowls, which you've so vehemently argued in favor of in every other season...

And again, does this mean Bama is the true champs of 1977 since Bama and AP champion Notre Dame both finished 11-1 - yet ND lost to Ole Miss who Alabama annihilated that year? Go ahead, once again apply your own logic to this one as well, you knuckle dragging phaggot.

quote:

---

Kirby Smart (1): 2021

---

Diminished title due to not winning the SEC (LDU logic) and Williams and Metchie missing the rematch.

quote:

---

Ed Orgeron (1): 2019

---

Diminished title due to Tua being out of action for a few weeks prior to the game with Bama (explains why he was rusty in the first half). Bama wins with a healthy Tua.