Started By
Message
re: Bo Bounds with a new level of delusion just now on Finebaum.....
Posted on 12/15/14 at 10:16 pm to ABearsFanNMS
Posted on 12/15/14 at 10:16 pm to ABearsFanNMS
My education blows your education out of the water.
4
Posted on 12/15/14 at 10:24 pm to TeLeFaWx
That proves it....you are delusional! Why not go compare the 2 schools rankings and come back and tell me how that is? Let me help you since a simple google search may be too much for you to handle...88>55
Do you want to compare graduate degrees also?
Do you want to compare graduate degrees also?
Posted on 12/15/14 at 10:27 pm to TeLeFaWx
Can you give me Trill's updated score?
Posted on 12/15/14 at 10:29 pm to NIH
That would take a google search which is too much for him to handle 
Posted on 12/15/14 at 10:30 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
Jobs better than State/Ole Miss
quote:
Notre Dame - about the same
Oklahoma - about the same
If you're not a troll, you need to have your head examined.
This post was edited on 12/15/14 at 10:30 pm
Posted on 12/15/14 at 10:34 pm to TeLeFaWx
So why didn't they hire Nick Saban and why haven't they been relevant in 20 years?
Posted on 12/15/14 at 10:36 pm to Henry Jones Jr
Seriously?
Big Choke Bob is what this year? When was Oklahoma relevant? Back before the SEC arms race right? Do you think he could compete in the SEC any better than Mullen's or Freeze.
Notre Dame? Did you forget 42-14 just a couple years ago? How about this year? They were 7-5 in a modified ACC schedule.
So no, I am not trolling just being realistic. Both those programs are living off the past and will quickly fall behind the SEC and even the PAC-12 unless they change things within their conference/quasi-conference.
Big Choke Bob is what this year? When was Oklahoma relevant? Back before the SEC arms race right? Do you think he could compete in the SEC any better than Mullen's or Freeze.
Notre Dame? Did you forget 42-14 just a couple years ago? How about this year? They were 7-5 in a modified ACC schedule.
So no, I am not trolling just being realistic. Both those programs are living off the past and will quickly fall behind the SEC and even the PAC-12 unless they change things within their conference/quasi-conference.
Posted on 12/15/14 at 10:40 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
My education blows
Most aggie diplomas require a good deal of blowin.
Posted on 12/15/14 at 10:43 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
When was Oklahoma relevant? Back before the SEC arms race right?
Yeah they didn't win a national title in 2000 or anything. Not to mention they finished with a top 10 ranking last year and dismantled Alabama in the Sugar Bowl.
quote:
Do you think he could compete in the SEC any better than Mullen's or Freeze.
Yes
quote:
Notre Dame? Did you forget 42-14 just a couple years ago?
They played in the national title game. When was the last time Ole Miss did that and has State ever done that?
quote:
Both those programs are living off the past
You're an Ole Miss fan saying this. Our greatest accomplishments are in the 1950's and 1960's. State's greatest accomplishments are a divisional title from 16 years ago and one SEC title from the 1940's. We both use those arguments from the past in the pissing contests about who has the better program.
Miami has won 5 national titles in the last 34 years but Ole Miss and State have a better program than they do? We've both had one good year and neither ended in any kind of championship. So no. Neither one of us are close to the program that Michigan, Notre Dame, Oklahoma or Miami are.
This post was edited on 12/15/14 at 10:47 pm
Posted on 12/15/14 at 10:49 pm to Sabear
Landmass-united is a beautiful thing...
Posted on 12/15/14 at 10:50 pm to Henry Jones Jr
You are missing my point. I am talking about the here and now. Today, both Mississippi programs are in a better position and making the right investments (in facilities, coaching & players) that will pay long-term dividends. Throw in the influx of money from the SEC network and national recognition you will continue to see the programs excel. Whereas with both Oklahoma & ND they are basically stagnant. So yes, even with storied programs, I would say that all 4 programs are about equal.
Posted on 12/15/14 at 11:00 pm to Henry Jones Jr
Furthermore, I am not a dyed in wool Rebel. Heck I am a guy who grew up in the Midwest when the Big 10 and Big 12 were the kings of college football. I would love to see Big Blue (btw I was accepted there but choose a different route), the Golden Domers, Husker and Boomer Nations rise again. But realistically that isn't going to happen. The best coaches are no different than the best players. They want the competition. They want to square off against the cream of the crop week in week out. You won't find that in those conferences/quasi-conference affiliation any more unless they make some drastic changes. It may be hard to accept for older guys like myself but the SEC is quickly going to out pace many schools. The only conference which is investing in coaches & infrastructure on a comparable level to the SEC is the PAC-12.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 1:06 am to engie
quote:
Pank is taking you fools to the woodshed up in here...
I legit spit truth up in this bish......one of these days...you MF's will learn to listen.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 2:40 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:
My education blows your education out of the water.
My daddy can beat up your daddy.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 11:46 am to rolltide32
Of course, Finebaum preceded Bounds' comments by saying "Alabama is obviously the top program in the country, but how would you rank Miss. St & O.Miss'?" Bounds explained in great detail why he thought this and made sense, but he was talking bottom line, now, not in the past.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 12:12 pm to Sabear
quote:
You have been served
Well, we know your first link (licensing revenue) is garbage, because it doesn't even have Kentucky listed in the top 75, but does have Texas State, UL Lafayette, and Montana State listed, along with Delaware etc.
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News