Started By
Message
re: Best QB-Receiver combos in the SEC
Posted on 9/19/10 at 9:02 pm to Razorback4life
Posted on 9/19/10 at 9:02 pm to Razorback4life
Chris Relf and Lsu's secondary 
2
Posted on 9/19/10 at 9:02 pm to FTBLFN
If you made a top 10, Mallett/Childs and Mallett/Adams could arguably both be in there...
(in fact if you look at the SEC receiving stats, Arkansas has three receivers in the top 10 yards receiving, each with 14 receptions or more)
McElroy/Jones is definitely up there
Garcia/Jeffrey for sure
Murray/Durham after last night...
(in fact if you look at the SEC receiving stats, Arkansas has three receivers in the top 10 yards receiving, each with 14 receptions or more)
McElroy/Jones is definitely up there
Garcia/Jeffrey for sure
Murray/Durham after last night...
Posted on 9/19/10 at 9:02 pm to Maroon80
Posted on 9/19/10 at 9:02 pm to Maroon80
quote:
Chris Relf and Lsu's secondary
Tyler Russel did pretty well too
Posted on 9/19/10 at 9:03 pm to Hog on the Hill
quote:
(in fact if you look at the SEC receiving stats, Arkansas has three receivers in the top 10 yards receiving, each with 14 receptions or more)
It's been like that 3 years in a row and really doesn't mean shite. His WR's did that at Louisville.
But when push came to shove they were terrible
Posted on 9/19/10 at 9:13 pm to memphisplaya
quote:
But when push came to shove they were terrible
Dont know how stats like that make you terrible.
Posted on 9/19/10 at 9:18 pm to Woopigsooie20
quote:
Mallett/Adams 18 hookups 344 yards 2 TD's
Mallett/Childs 19 hookups 254 yards 3 TD's
Posted on 9/19/10 at 9:24 pm to Razorback4life
quote:
Dont know how stats like that make you terrible.
His reasoning is based around the assumption that Mallett/Childs/Adams/Williams/Hamilton/Wright/ETC weren't any good because the team is not capable of winning on the road in the SEC.
You have to ignore that they faced the top defenses from the SEC on the road, that they were true fresh/sophs, and most importantly to remember that Arkansas doesn't improve from year to year, all the teams around them either get better or worse.
Posted on 9/19/10 at 9:26 pm to DaleDenton
No when push came to shove means .... when not in his system.
In other words the NFL.
It proved just how much of "SYSTEM" he runs
In other words the NFL.
It proved just how much of "SYSTEM" he runs
Posted on 9/19/10 at 10:32 pm to FTBLFN
McElroy/Hanks
Posted on 9/19/10 at 10:36 pm to memphisplaya
quote:
No when push came to shove means .... when not in his system.
In other words the NFL.
It proved just how much of "SYSTEM" he runs
You mean the same offense over half the NFL runs?
You just make the "system" shite up.
Maybe LSU should start running our so called "system" offense, and you might score some points.
This post was edited on 9/19/10 at 10:40 pm
Posted on 9/19/10 at 10:45 pm to Woopigsooie20
Someone's nuts are orbiting the moon right now
Posted on 9/19/10 at 10:46 pm to Woopigsooie20
Without a QB it doesn't matter what system you use and they don't have any.
Posted on 9/19/10 at 11:11 pm to memphisplaya
quote:Here let me copy and paste the thread title for you since you missed it the first time around:
It's been like that 3 years in a row and really doesn't mean shite. His WR's did that at Louisville.
But when push came to shove they were terrible
"Best QB-Receiver combos in the SEC"
SEC != NFL
LSU receivers wouldn't even make it into the top 15 list because you have crappy QBs.
Posted on 9/19/10 at 11:16 pm to Hog on the Hill
Hartline-Cobbs
Posted on 9/19/10 at 11:27 pm to Hog on the Hill
quote:sad isn't it. I am almost positive that we have the best receiving corps in the sec, quite possibly the country.
LSU receivers wouldn't even make it into the top 15 list because you have crappy QBs.
Posted on 9/20/10 at 1:04 am to memphisplaya
quote:
No when push came to shove means .... when not in his system.
In other words the NFL.
The talent level of the WR's that he had at Louisville doesn't even begin to compare to the talent level of the current crop of WR's that Arkansas has.
Posted on 9/20/10 at 2:30 am to Razorback4life
quote:
we dont want, or need julio...we have some of the best recievers already.
You are a dumbass. Julio is better than any of Arky's recievers.
Posted on 9/20/10 at 2:35 am to Funky Tide 8
quote:
You are a dumbass. Julio is better than any of Arky's recievers.
Yet he hasn't done anything to PROVE that.
Posted on 9/20/10 at 2:46 am to ocelot4ark
quote:
Yet he hasn't done anything to PROVE that.
He has better stats than Childs in almost every statistical category while being in a run first offense(as opposed to Arky's pass happy offense), but yeah, you are right, he has not proven anything.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News