Started By
Message
Best Five Non-SEC Football Teams in 2013
Posted on 7/7/13 at 5:11 pm
Posted on 7/7/13 at 5:11 pm
Who will they be?
Clemson
Ohio State
Florida State
Stanford
Virginia Tech
That's my opinion.
Clemson
Ohio State
Florida State
Stanford
Virginia Tech
That's my opinion.
This post was edited on 7/7/13 at 5:45 pm
Posted on 7/7/13 at 5:20 pm to deeprig9
WV was a joke last year when they played good team.. Why should they be better this year?
Posted on 7/7/13 at 5:22 pm to deeprig9
Oregon
Ohio St
Stanford
Louisville
Michigan
Ohio St
Stanford
Louisville
Michigan
Posted on 7/7/13 at 5:22 pm to mrbroker
I don't know that they're even top 3 in their conference.
Posted on 7/7/13 at 5:28 pm to deeprig9
Ohio state
stanford
Louisville
oregon
Oklahoma
stanford
Louisville
oregon
Oklahoma
Posted on 7/7/13 at 5:30 pm to SpartyGator
quote:
Ohio state
stanford
Louisville
oregon
Oklahoma
Posted on 7/7/13 at 5:40 pm to dallasga6
Clemson (should) be good this year. I'd put them in my top five not SEC. West Virginia though? That's just crazy talk.
Posted on 7/7/13 at 5:45 pm to Lima Whiskey
I meant Virginia Tech in the OP, and edited as such. It was a brain fart.
Posted on 7/7/13 at 5:49 pm to deeprig9
1. Stanford
2. Ohio State
3. Clemson
4. Oregon
5. Louisville
2. Ohio State
3. Clemson
4. Oregon
5. Louisville
Posted on 7/7/13 at 5:56 pm to CrimsonFlounder
Sanford
Ohio State
Texas A&M
Clemson
Louisville
Ohio State
Texas A&M
Clemson
Louisville
Posted on 7/7/13 at 5:56 pm to CrimsonFlounder
1. Stanford
2. Clemson
3. TCU - My surprise team for the year
4. Ohio State
5. Louisville
2. Clemson
3. TCU - My surprise team for the year
4. Ohio State
5. Louisville
Posted on 7/7/13 at 5:56 pm to CrimsonFlounder
How much does louisville lose from last years team?
Posted on 7/7/13 at 5:56 pm to deeprig9
quote:
I meant Virginia Tech in the OP, and edited as such. It was a brain fart.
VT is gonna suck fat cock this year.
Posted on 7/7/13 at 5:58 pm to deeprig9
Tech... homerism aside, I don't see it.
They're losing the recruiting battle and they have serious issue at QB, and with their o-line. Logan Thomas looked great two years ago, but that was when he had NFL caliber receivers that could catch anything. They should be solid on defense, but they'll have trouble putting up points.
Louisville has one of the easiest schedules in D1 football, they'll earn a top ten ranking by the end of the season. Will they deserve it though?
They're losing the recruiting battle and they have serious issue at QB, and with their o-line. Logan Thomas looked great two years ago, but that was when he had NFL caliber receivers that could catch anything. They should be solid on defense, but they'll have trouble putting up points.
Louisville has one of the easiest schedules in D1 football, they'll earn a top ten ranking by the end of the season. Will they deserve it though?
This post was edited on 7/7/13 at 6:05 pm
Posted on 7/7/13 at 5:58 pm to FootballNostradamus
OSU probably isnt in the top 5 in talent, but they will have a higher ranking and more wins because of their high school type schedule. They would finish out of the top 5 in the SEC.
Posted on 7/7/13 at 5:59 pm to CrimsonFlounder
quote:
1. Stanford
2. Ohio State
3. Clemson
4. Oregon
5. Louisville
There's the winning list. OU replaces Landry Jones with a big lug who runs well but cannot pass. I don't know enough about VT. I have to leave off FSU simply because they're always overrated at the start.
Posted on 7/7/13 at 6:01 pm to finestfirst79
Oregon
Stanford
Clemson
FSU
Louisville
Stanford
Clemson
FSU
Louisville
Posted on 7/7/13 at 6:06 pm to CatsGoneWild
quote:
OSU probably isnt in the top 5 in talent, but they will have a higher ranking and more wins because of their high school type schedule. They would finish out of the top 5 in the SEC.
Agreed, the lack of parity in scheduling makes the whole ranking business madness.
This post was edited on 7/7/13 at 6:08 pm
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News