Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/23/13 at 11:03 am to Aggie Dynasty
I don't remember the play in question, but calling this cheating without actually seeing where the runner is down or out of bounds is ridiculous.
Have you considered the possibility that the referee saw the runner go down or out of bounds at the stick then incorrectly marked the spot with his foot and then looked to correct his initial mistake?
I'm not saying this is the case, but the editing of the video to cut out the play is odd. The case for cheating would be much more compelling if we could see where the ball should have been spotted by watching the play.
Have you considered the possibility that the referee saw the runner go down or out of bounds at the stick then incorrectly marked the spot with his foot and then looked to correct his initial mistake?
I'm not saying this is the case, but the editing of the video to cut out the play is odd. The case for cheating would be much more compelling if we could see where the ball should have been spotted by watching the play.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 11:04 am to Aggie Dynasty
Six letters
REC
DWI
REC
DWI
Posted on 9/23/13 at 11:07 am to thatdude1985
You will now down to Alabama in the Fall and to Kentucky in the Winter, understand? Very occasionally there will be seasons when we will allow you to exercise a win or two to keep you interested.
All hail the fiefdom of Bamatucky!
All hail the fiefdom of Bamatucky!
Posted on 9/23/13 at 11:28 am to pvilleguru
quote:
Is it not common knowledge that we run this conference?
Do we? According to the Bayou Bengals, LSU has been the team to beat and runs the show.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 11:30 am to hsqb
Posted on 9/23/13 at 11:36 am to Aggie Dynasty
Sorry, but why would we have to explain a ref spotting a ball? Because he looked back to see where the field judge was telling him to spot the ball?
Do you have another angle of what the field ref was telling him where to put the ball? Please share.
LINK
Also, it was the correct spot if you look at the play.
also, why would the refs cheat for us in the first quarter against fricking OM.
Do you have another angle of what the field ref was telling him where to put the ball? Please share.
LINK
Also, it was the correct spot if you look at the play.
also, why would the refs cheat for us in the first quarter against fricking OM.
This post was edited on 9/23/13 at 11:38 am
Posted on 9/23/13 at 11:39 am to tjhilton
quote:
Kinda like this "no-call" pass interference;
LINK
Gimme a break, there were plenty of bad calls both way, don't act like yall got screwed.
bunch of whining babies in this thread.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 11:41 am to Funky Tide 8
quote:
Because he looked back to see where the field judge was telling him to spot the ball?
he looked back at the first down marker
Posted on 9/23/13 at 11:42 am to Choctaw
That's because he knows who runs things around here.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 11:43 am to Aggie Dynasty
looks like cheating to me...
but im from Abbeville.. what do i know?
but im from Abbeville.. what do i know? 
Posted on 9/23/13 at 11:45 am to taylormade
Bama so powerful they shut Uncle Milty and his Victoryland casino down after it was used to pay Cam's Dad Cecil 232k. 
Posted on 9/23/13 at 11:46 am to Choctaw
quote:
Because he looked back to see where the field judge was telling him to spot the ball?
he looked back at the first down marker
After he looked at the field judge. Also, is a ref not allowed to look behind him. It was obviously the right spot where the WR went down.
OMGZZz cheaterzzz
Posted on 9/23/13 at 11:47 am to Aggie Dynasty
quote:
Please tell me this doesn't go on over here in the SEC.
Of course it does. Welcome back to being the league bitch.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 11:49 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Question for Auburn fans:
Did you guys think that the illegal touching on that onside kick was a good call? I thought it was perfectly executed, and was very surprised that they called it illegal touching.
Did you guys think that the illegal touching on that onside kick was a good call? I thought it was perfectly executed, and was very surprised that they called it illegal touching.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 11:50 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
didn't bama go an entire season without a holding call a few years ago?
Posted on 9/23/13 at 11:51 am to Funky Tide 8
quote:
I thought it was perfectly executed, and was very surprised that they called it illegal touching.
he was about 2 inches too quick
Posted on 9/23/13 at 11:51 am to Choctaw
quote:
didn't bama go an entire season without a holding call a few years ago?
No
Posted on 9/23/13 at 11:52 am to Funky Tide 8
No way it even mattered. We spotted them too many points off turnovers (not that they wouldn't have scored anyway without the turnovers). Their line completely blew us off the ball at the start of the game.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News