Started By
Message
re: Auburn’s rings are in!!
Posted on 4/18/18 at 12:25 pm to thomasbrown_2007
Posted on 4/18/18 at 12:25 pm to thomasbrown_2007
quote:
It's okay, the other names for them are war robin's.
It's War Tigers idiot. You can't even tell the joke the right way.
1
Posted on 4/18/18 at 12:35 pm to DaveyDownerDawg
quote:
No. The schools decide on the rings designs and who gets them. But let’s keep acting like Bama doesn’t do these types of things...
It was a bowl ring that included winning the SEC West. It was not an SEC West championship ring. Just accept that you did this and move on.
Posted on 4/18/18 at 12:37 pm to StopRobot
quote:
It was a bowl ring that included winning the SEC West. It was not an SEC West championship ring. Just accept that you did this and move on.
So you made a bowl ring for a bowl game you lost? How Ole Miss of Alabama
Posted on 4/18/18 at 12:39 pm to lsufball19
Not as bad as making championship rings that say #2 on them.
Posted on 4/18/18 at 12:42 pm to AHM21
quote:
Not as bad as making championship rings that say #2 on them.
Actually making an SEC West Champions and Sugar Bowl participation ring is worse than making an SEC Championship ring with their record and final ranking on the side.
What's funny is you created this thread to bag on Auburn for making SEC West Champions rings, when, in fact, Alabama has done the same exact thing. No need to crawfish now that your troll thread has collapsed on top of you.
This post was edited on 4/18/18 at 12:46 pm
Posted on 4/18/18 at 12:47 pm to AUsteriskPride
This is such an Auburn move 
Posted on 4/18/18 at 12:52 pm to lsufball19
It’s nine pages in. You’re still commenting.
You win?
You win?
Posted on 4/18/18 at 12:53 pm to AHM21
quote:
It’s nine pages in. You’re still commenting.
yes, and clearly others are as well considering it's gone 9 pages. I have like 4 or 5 posts ITT
quote:is this you conceding you were a dumbass in the OP?
You win?
Posted on 4/18/18 at 12:57 pm to lsufball19
I’ve enjoyed this thread. There’s no need to get worked up.
In the OP, I never piled on. Rings are in, #26-14. No idea why that upsets you.
In the OP, I never piled on. Rings are in, #26-14. No idea why that upsets you.
Posted on 4/18/18 at 12:59 pm to AHM21
You didn't know that y'all had already made division rings before. No idea why that upsets you.
Posted on 4/18/18 at 1:00 pm to Rabern57
quote:
Still not as bad as having to brag about your record against Auburn every time someone starts mentioning NCs. But maybe you'll get over the Hump some day.
UG fans have this weird obsession with regular season wins over titles (see my sig).
Posted on 4/18/18 at 1:02 pm to AHM21
quote:
I’ve enjoyed this thread. There’s no need to get worked up.
In the OP, I never piled on. Rings are in, #26-14. No idea why that upsets you.
no one is getting worked up, they're just calling you out for your swing and a miss. Just be honest, when you created this thread, you had no idea Alabama made West Championship and Sugar Bowl participation rings. Neither did the majority of your fan base.
This post was edited on 4/18/18 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 4/18/18 at 1:06 pm to AHM21
Way to go, you guys! Great season.
Posted on 4/18/18 at 1:53 pm to lsufball19
Almost every school makes rings like that. It's a gift to the players. I don't really have a problem with anyone doing it. Little bit strange, sure, but there is nothing wrong with it. Celebrate accomplishments.
Posted on 4/18/18 at 2:05 pm to bamaboy87
I think it's pathetic to make division rings, especially for any of the upper tier SEC programs.
Posted on 4/18/18 at 2:18 pm to Korin
I agree. Just because everyone does it doesn’t make it right. I would’ve been making fun of Alabama in April of 2009.
This post was edited on 4/18/18 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 4/18/18 at 2:28 pm to bamaboy87
quote:
Almost every school makes rings like that. It's a gift to the players. I don't really have a problem with anyone doing it. Little bit strange, sure, but there is nothing wrong with it. Celebrate accomplishments.
I agree. Rings are no different than trophies to me. I'm sure plenty of guys in here were named All-District or something to that extent in high school and were given a trophy/plaque to commemorate it. They don't throw the plaque in the trash because they were only All-District and not All-Americans. That is basically what some people are implying in this thread, that giving out rings for division titles is stupid because they weren't national titles. One accomplishment is certainly better than the other but that doesn't mean the lesser accomplishment isn't still an accomplishment and shouldn't be recognized.
This post was edited on 4/18/18 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 4/18/18 at 3:25 pm to StopRobot
quote:
It was a bowl ring that included winning the SEC West.
No it was a ring Alabama designed to commemorate the year
quote:
It was not an SEC West championship ring.
its also not a bowl ring
quote:
Just accept that you did this and move on.
I am not the one having trouble accepting what their school has done. You are the one trying to say they didnt, when they did make a ring for losing two games. Posted on 4/18/18 at 3:31 pm to Korin
quote:
I think it's pathetic to make division rings, especially for any of the upper tier SEC programs.
They are allowed to spend a certain amount, so they do it. they want to make sure they use every part of the NCAA allowed money
Posted on 4/18/18 at 4:20 pm to lsufball19
quote:You have to be smart enough before you can concede to stupidity. Just look at the Bama fans thinking if they post a picture of some NC ring or spin it to something else it takes away the fact they have done the exact same thing the OP is making fun of.
is this you conceding you were a dumbass in the OP?
Page 9 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News