Started By
Message
re: Auburn without Cam Newton
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:06 pm to blzr
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:06 pm to blzr
One thing I pointed out to an AU fan is that without Cam AU would have been an 8 win team at best. Consider that going into this season the expectations would have been the same due to the losses. Most people expect AU to be at best a 7 win team this year. Now consider that it's Chizick's third year and no one expects him to do anything. Then again thats the difference in contenders and wanna be's. LSU, FL, or BAMA gets a new coach we expect to win it all by the third year. AU gets one and starts preping their grandchildren for the next #1 to come around.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:06 pm to BigerTait
Why exactly do you feel like its your mission to prove to Auburn fans they wouldn't have been as good LAST YEAR without their star QB? It's obvious to most of us that we wouldn't have had the season we had without him...
The argument is completely stupid though because he DID play for Auburn. yeah, there were a lot of unsung heroes on that team that didnt get attention but saying "you wouldn't have won without Cam" is just an attempt to belittle what they did. It's like saying "Your car wouldn't have won that race if it had no gas"... It's stupid and a childish reason to try to take the wind out of their sail IMO.
Here LSU is looking like world beaters this year and IMO has a great chance to take it to the house and you're worried about if AU would've won last year without Cam...
The argument is completely stupid though because he DID play for Auburn. yeah, there were a lot of unsung heroes on that team that didnt get attention but saying "you wouldn't have won without Cam" is just an attempt to belittle what they did. It's like saying "Your car wouldn't have won that race if it had no gas"... It's stupid and a childish reason to try to take the wind out of their sail IMO.
Here LSU is looking like world beaters this year and IMO has a great chance to take it to the house and you're worried about if AU would've won last year without Cam...
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:06 pm to Hubbhogg
I wasnt the one who started the topic in the car, just giving my opinion on the matter.
To all the Auburn fans with the "Umad?" responses.
No. Not mad. Auburn represented the SEC well last year. Im just trying to be realistic and get a serious response out of you.
To all the Auburn fans with the "Umad?" responses.
No. Not mad. Auburn represented the SEC well last year. Im just trying to be realistic and get a serious response out of you.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:07 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
I mean come on, what is the point to even having these discussions?
The rest of the SEC likes to see Aub/Bama fans get wrapped around the axle over meaningless crap to see how many pages of bullsh we can spew.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:07 pm to BigerTait
Just read your post. I agree that AU wouldn't have won the NC without Cam. It is impossible to know what the record would have been, so it is silly to argue about because there is no way for anyone to be proven right or wrong. I agree that Cam was clutch with his ability to pound the ball and control the clock in the 4th quarter last year.
I disagree that anything you see from AU this year, including the defensive struggles so far, lends any credence to your points about how much AU misses Cam. In fact, AU misses its interior D-Line and experienced MLB much more than Cam so far this year.
I disagree that anything you see from AU this year, including the defensive struggles so far, lends any credence to your points about how much AU misses Cam. In fact, AU misses its interior D-Line and experienced MLB much more than Cam so far this year.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:08 pm to 4nmylifetime
quote:
win it all by the third year.
And Chizik did it in his second. frick off redneck...we'll be competing for the MNC next year and very often after that.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:08 pm to 4nmylifetime
quote:
without Cam AU would have been an 8 win team at best.
Debatable, senior led team can do a lot.
quote:
Most people expect AU to be at best a 7 win team this year.
All our 35 Seniors/Juniors left.
quote:
LSU, FL, or BAMA gets a new coach we expect to win it all by the third year. AU gets one and starts preping their grandchildren for the next #1 to come around.
2-0
ETA: You can take Cam off your sig now, he won't hurt your team anymore.. unless you're a Saints or Falcons fan.
This post was edited on 9/14/11 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:09 pm to 4nmylifetime
quote:
4nmylifetime
he definitely still mad.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:09 pm to BigerTait
quote:
three of my good friends who just happen to be Auburn fans.
Eww.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:10 pm to BigerTait
quote:
Im just trying to be realistic and get a serious response out of you.
The Rig gave you a serious response. Play calling throughout the games would have been completely different, so the comebacks may have not been necessary. We may have lost 4 or 5 of those, or maybe a couple of those close games aren't even close and we win going away. These scenarios are silly.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:11 pm to stat19
quote:
The rest of the SEC likes to see Aub/Bama fans get wrapped around the axle over meaningless crap to see how many pages of bullsh we can spew.
I think we average about 22.5 per topic
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:12 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
Oh, I forgot.
Cam stole a laptop.
Cam stole a laptop.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:12 pm to Eagle Of War AU
quote:
Why exactly do you feel like its your mission to prove to Auburn fans they wouldn't have been as good LAST YEAR without their star QB? It's obvious to most of us that we wouldn't have had the season we had without him...
The argument is completely stupid though because he DID play for Auburn. yeah, there were a lot of unsung heroes on that team that didnt get attention but saying "you wouldn't have won without Cam" is just an attempt to belittle what they did. It's like saying "Your car wouldn't have won that race if it had no gas"... It's stupid and a childish reason to try to take the wind out of their sail IMO.
Here LSU is looking like world beaters this year and IMO has a great chance to take it to the house and you're worried about if AU would've won last year without Cam...
^^^^^THIS^^^^^
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:14 pm to WDE24
quote:
I disagree that anything you see from AU this year, including the defensive struggles so far, lends any credence to your points about how much AU misses Cam. In fact, AU misses its interior D-Line and experienced MLB much more than Cam so far this year.
THIS^^^ AU's Offense will still be among the top ranked in the SEC this year, WITH freshman Oline.
Where we miss Cam is on 3rd&under5. He could just fall forward and keep drives going. Trotter will prob have more passing yards than Cam this year. Our offense will still put up points.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:14 pm to BigerTait
To answer this stipud thread...witout Cam Newton AU runs an entirely different offense and thus each game last year would have been entirely different. So to say that we won close games with Cam and because of Cam si dumb.
take away the best player in the country and otehr players are forced to step up and make plays. defenses are forced to scheme differently. Would AU have won more or less than 9-10 games...nobody knows because THE GAMES DIDNT HAPPEN.
Without Cam Newton, AU is 10-5 today under Coach Chizik with close losses to Bama, UGA, and UK. The reason I bring up the losses are that only LSU and Arky have proven that they can blow out an AU-less Cam Newton.
take away the best player in the country and otehr players are forced to step up and make plays. defenses are forced to scheme differently. Would AU have won more or less than 9-10 games...nobody knows because THE GAMES DIDNT HAPPEN.
Without Cam Newton, AU is 10-5 today under Coach Chizik with close losses to Bama, UGA, and UK. The reason I bring up the losses are that only LSU and Arky have proven that they can blow out an AU-less Cam Newton.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:16 pm to BigerTait
Hmmm...wonder what Stanford would be like without Luck...wonder what Bama would have been like in 2009 without Ingram...LSU without PP7....oh thats right...doesn't matter because they DID have those players...
These discussions are the dumbest...
I wouldn't get wet when it rains if rain wasn't water and water wasn't wet...
These discussions are the dumbest...
I wouldn't get wet when it rains if rain wasn't water and water wasn't wet...
This post was edited on 9/14/11 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:17 pm to DonAUfan
quote:
Why exactly do you feel like its your mission to prove to Auburn fans they wouldn't have been as good LAST YEAR without their star QB?
I dont think its my mission. I am just recounting a discussion that was brought up by one of my Auburn friends. Listening to them made it difficult to not chime in and give my opinion, which I dont think is absurd.
This post was edited on 9/14/11 at 3:19 pm
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:18 pm to BigerTait
quote:
which I dont think
This is very apparent and also your problem...
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:21 pm to BigerTait
quote:
I am just recounting a discussion that was brought up by one of my Auburn friends.
It was a dumb argument then to.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 3:33 pm to Aubie83
quote:
which I dont think
Come one now...
I gave my opinion on a topic, so what?
How about you come up with your own opinions rather than bash others for having them.
This post was edited on 9/14/11 at 3:34 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News