Started By
Message

re: Auburn May Add National Championships

Posted on 1/31/14 at 2:53 pm to
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

well there is a big difference between the two, Ill let you be the judge


The only difference is '41 Alabama didn't win their conference. They still went to a major bowl (the Cotton Bowl) and won it. While you'd think on the surface that a conference championship is a big deal, 2011 Alabama proves this is not the case.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54193 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

because not a single one of the teams you mentioned above (1941 Alabama included) finished #1 in a major poll.
I think that is the entire point being made. AU is considering not limiting themselves to just major poll championships because the teams that they are compared to don't either.

I wouldn't do it if I were making the call, but I don't really care one way or the other.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

I'm glad LSU is above this bs.

Y'all should claim 1908. The NCAA says it's good.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

AU is considering not limiting themselves to just major poll championships because the teams that they are compared to don't either.


Which is why I am fine with Auburn wanting to add 1910, 1913, and 1914. Those make plenty of sense in the grand scheme of things. But to include 1958, 1983, 1993, and 2004 just because Alabama claims ONE non-legit title in the poll era is simply asinine.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

I think that is the entire point being made. AU is considering not limiting themselves to just major poll championships because the teams that they are compared to don't either.

I wouldn't do it if I were making the call, but I don't really care one way or the other.

Here's the problem though. As bad as the 41 claim is for Alabama, they still got a selection. Y'all didn't get a single one in 1910, 14, 58, or 2004.

Starts on page 74.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

The only difference is '41 Alabama didn't win their conference.


close, but still not there.

hint think about why yall claimed "rose bowl titles"
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Korin
quote:

Here's the problem though. As bad as the 41 claim is for Alabama, they still got a selection. Y'all didn't get a single one in 1910, 14, 58, or 2004.

Starts on page 74.


sorry you are still having a hard time grasping
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

close, but still not there.

hint think about why yall claimed "rose bowl titles"

The Rose was the only bowl game until 1934.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54193 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

But to include 1958, 1983, 1993, and 2004 just because Alabama claims ONE non-legit title in the poll era is simply asinine.
First, it isn't just Bama, but I don't understand why it is asinine.


Here, AU is simply deciding whether to "officially" claim championships that have already been awarded to them the same way other program, including Bama, have.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54193 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Here's the problem though. As bad as the 41 claim is for Alabama, they still got a selection. Y'all didn't get a single one in 1910, 14, 58, or 2004.



quote:

All were recognized as national champions by at least one national selector, which are used by other schools to recognize National Championships.


Nice alter btw.
This post was edited on 1/31/14 at 3:04 pm
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Here, AU is simply deciding whether to "officially" claim championships that have already been awarded to them the same way other program, including Bama, have.



If that's the case then Alabama can go ahead and claim 1937, 1966, 1975, 1977, 1991, and 1994 to the list of championships they could claim. Alabama could claim as many as 27 but only claims 15.

Posted by Wallacewade04
Valhalla
Member since Dec 2011
2780 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:05 pm to
either way if you do it you go Bammer

welcome to the club again
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54193 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

If that's the case then Alabama can go ahead and claim 1937, 1966, 1975, 1977, 1991, and 1994 to the list of championships they could claim.
Are you sure? They were awarded championships by a national selector that other schools use to claim Championships?

If so, I suppose they could. I suspect you are just saying that because another poster said so and you don't really know.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

The Rose was the only bowl game until 1934.


good god, you need to read up before you start posting
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

They were awarded championships by a national selector that other schools use to claim Championships?


How many schools claim the New York Times as their soul reason for awarding themselves a national championship? How many legit selectors awarded Auburn the national championship in 1993 and 2004?

If these were legitimate national selectors, Auburn would have awarded themselves these championships years ago. The same goes for Alabama with the years I listed above.
This post was edited on 1/31/14 at 3:09 pm
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:10 pm to
They got 1 selection in 93 (National Championship Foundation). They got none in 04.
This post was edited on 1/31/14 at 3:10 pm
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54193 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

How many legit selectors awarded Auburn the national championship in 1993?

If these were legitimate national selectors, Auburn would have awarded themselves these championships years ago.
Umm...this title is recognized by the NCAA already. Did you even read the article in the OP?

quote:

1993: Finished 11-0. Outscored opponents 353-192. Recognized national champion by four selectors including National Championship Foundation. Recognized by the NCAA.
This post was edited on 1/31/14 at 3:12 pm
Posted by S.E.C. Crazy
Alabama
Member since Feb 2013
7905 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:10 pm to
RED HEADED STEP CHILD YOU WILL ALWAYS BE, YOU WILL.

YODA.......
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54193 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

They got 1 selection in 93 (National Championship Foundation).
4.

Why the alter? What happened to the other account?
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

good god, you need to read up before you start posting

Your hook is REALLY showing now.
Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13 14 15 ... 24
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 24Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter