Started By
Message
re: At least 5 teams way better than LSU
Posted on 9/17/25 at 9:48 am to Faurot fodder
Posted on 9/17/25 at 9:48 am to Faurot fodder
quote:
He said we had a shitty defense. It's top 5 in the nation.
Yeah, because no way playing Central Arkansas or UL Laffayette would pad your stats.
1
Posted on 9/17/25 at 9:49 am to mattieo
Bama is not better than LSU lolololol
Bama’s biggest asset in the LSU game is a lingering torso injury to our QB
I didn’t even know Mizzou was playing this year. Mizzou has to be the most boring team in football history. No one cares.
Bama’s biggest asset in the LSU game is a lingering torso injury to our QB
I didn’t even know Mizzou was playing this year. Mizzou has to be the most boring team in football history. No one cares.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 9:51 am to lowhound
You might want to take a look at the offense stats of the 3 teams LSU beat. They ain't that great.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 9:59 am to mattieo
What a stupid post.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 9:59 am to mattieo
What is Mizzou fans obsession with LSU? Mizzou fans definitely have little man syndrome.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 9:59 am to mattieo
That’s funny because we don’t really think about UMisery at all.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:06 am to OilfieldLSUFan
Like a cherry, Missouri offers nothing of substance
Coated in red dye
Overly sweet
And adorning foods and drinks made for children
Missouri is the acrid aftertaste of fakeness
Hereinafter referred to as cherries
Coated in red dye
Overly sweet
And adorning foods and drinks made for children
Missouri is the acrid aftertaste of fakeness
Hereinafter referred to as cherries
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:11 am to OilfieldLSUFan
quote:
What is Mizzou fans obsession with LSU? Mizzou fans definitely have little man syndrome.
I’m not sure.
That post on our board about pretending we’re playing LSU last week still hisses at me. I wish they’d delete it, but instead they banned me for criticizing it. It really is an embarrassing post.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:16 am to Faurot fodder
Top 5 against who? Kansas? ??
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:17 am to VT4
We think of LSU as the dingleberry of the SEC, all stinky, hairy and full of shite.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:18 am to PPeterson1
Have you even paid attention to how shitty Clemson, La Tech and Florida offenses have been?
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:19 am to Faurot fodder
Cherry numero uno
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:22 am to mattieo
Yea, these are some real world beaters this season:
SEC teams are averaging less than 30.0 PPG, with their starting QBs:
LSU — 20.0 PPG — QB: Garrett Nussmeier.
Texas — ~24.0 PPG (72 points in 3 games) — QB: Arch Manning.
Florida — 27.0 PPG — QB: DJ Lagway.
South Carolina — 23.0 PPG — QB: LaNorris Sellers.
Kentucky — ~23.5 PPG (47 points in 2 games) — QB: Cutter Boley.
-----
-----
Why are we even suiting up and playing games this season? LSU is obviously returned to all of their glory .... I mean just look at what they've done to some VERY STIFF competition this season thus far. Kind of wild too, seeing as how they are averaging the least amount of points scored this season.
SEC teams are averaging less than 30.0 PPG, with their starting QBs:
LSU — 20.0 PPG — QB: Garrett Nussmeier.
Texas — ~24.0 PPG (72 points in 3 games) — QB: Arch Manning.
Florida — 27.0 PPG — QB: DJ Lagway.
South Carolina — 23.0 PPG — QB: LaNorris Sellers.
Kentucky — ~23.5 PPG (47 points in 2 games) — QB: Cutter Boley.
-----
-----
Why are we even suiting up and playing games this season? LSU is obviously returned to all of their glory .... I mean just look at what they've done to some VERY STIFF competition this season thus far. Kind of wild too, seeing as how they are averaging the least amount of points scored this season.
This post was edited on 9/17/25 at 10:23 am
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:25 am to Faurot fodder
quote:
You might want to take a look at the offense stats of the 3 teams LSU beat. They ain't that great.
Someone slept through a few statistics courses. It’s 3 games. The low ranked defenses generally probably played the high ranked offenses. The high ranked offenses generally probably played the low ranked defenses. Hence the term “data points.”
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:25 am to genuineLSUtiger
quote:
When is the last time Vandy beat LSU? It doesn’t happen.
9-22-1990.
Ya'll are due.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:26 am to Tiger_Claw
quote:
LSU is obviously returned to all of their glory .... I mean just look at what they've done to some VERY STIFF competition this season thus far.
No one has said this. This thread wasn’t even started by an LSU fan lol. Unless you get this mad by people saying they don’t really think about Mizzou.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:29 am to vidtiger23
quote:
Unless you get this mad by people saying they don’t really think about Mizzou.
Not sure why you would think I am angry? I am use to the LSU hate (news flash -- not a new development). I am simply posting additional data that supports the OP's claims. LSU is scoring less points per game than even Kentucky. While I do "hear" that defenses win championships ... I am not so sure you got the horses to do it all via one side of the ball.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:30 am to vidtiger23
How are you measuring your defense?
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:30 am to mattieo
When has Mizpoo been relevant in anything? I'll wait
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:32 am to Tiger_Claw
quote:
I am not so sure you got the horses to do it all via one side of the ball.
I am also questioning if we do tbh. But being behind Kentucky in PPG has nothing to do with it. We have a very good chance of getting a last minute Touchdown against Florida if we wanted it. Did we want it? Of course not as it didn’t matter at all. Using solely PPG as a measure without context it’s stupid. Because Florida State scored 77 against a junior college doesn’t mean they are 20 points better than another team who may score 56 for example. Context matters.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News