Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/27/12 at 9:31 pm to npt817
quote:
At the end of the day you are still just Arkansas.
Based on the posts of these piggy fans, this has got to just drive them crazy.
Posted on 1/27/12 at 9:47 pm to Quantrill
Hey guys what's going on in this thread? Can someone summarize the last 9 pages?
Posted on 1/27/12 at 10:03 pm to Hog on the Hill
quote:
Hey guys what's going on in this thread? Can someone summarize the last 9 pages?
Butthurt, lots and lots of butthurt.
As we sail on...
Posted on 1/27/12 at 11:51 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Posted by Message
DaleDenton
quote:
Butthurt, lots and lots of butthurt.
Trolling, lots and lots of trolling.
As is usual when DD is part of a thread, much less the OP.
Posted on 1/28/12 at 1:02 am to roadGator
quote:
High number of missing teeth and lots of banjo music?
One of my favorite bands to see in Fville, led by a New Orleans Katrina transplant. Lots of crazy hippies and rednecks come out for this group, it's a wild time.
Mountain Sprout - OCC @ George's
Posted on 1/28/12 at 6:51 am to Latarian
quote:
Things we've taken from Tennessee:
Arky starts to have a few good season's and now have 19 mythical championships...
Posted on 1/28/12 at 6:59 am to volhound
quote:
mythical championships
Posted on 1/28/12 at 11:12 am to TT9
quote:
TT9
Posted on 1/28/12 at 11:46 am to SunHog
Tennessee outspends every program in the nation.
they live by OOS recruiting.
They have a business model based on filling that 110,000 person stadium.
a lot of those seats go to pay the recruiting bill.
they live by OOS recruiting.
They have a business model based on filling that 110,000 person stadium.
a lot of those seats go to pay the recruiting bill.
Posted on 1/28/12 at 11:55 am to ottothewise
quote:
Tennessee outspends every program in the nation.
I believe Auburn spends more on football than anyone else, but it could have been percentage based, I read that somewhere one time.
Posted on 1/28/12 at 12:08 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
I believe Auburn spends more on football than anyone else,
it's Tenn. for recruiting expenses, at least for 2010-2011.
LINK
Posted on 1/28/12 at 3:42 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
I believe Auburn spends more on football than anyone else, but it could have been percentage based, I read that somewhere one time.
quote:
it's Tenn. for recruiting expenses, at least for 2010-2011.
We talking about recruiting expenses, or money spent on recruits?
Posted on 1/28/12 at 4:50 pm to volhound
hahahaha
Posted on 1/30/12 at 9:56 am to DaleDenton
quote:
LSU and Auburn have only won when the division, conference and FBS level of football have been down.
So, by your own admission, Arkansas had a down year in 2011 then? And, by that same admission, so did 'Bama, who won the National Championship?
Bless your heart. You try so hard.
Posted on 1/30/12 at 10:26 am to gallagherkck
quote:
So, by your own admission, Arkansas had a down year in 2011 then? And, by that same admission, so did 'Bama, who won the National Championship?
Read the entire sentence.
2003, 2007, and 2010 were very lean years for CFB in the BCS era.
Posted on 1/30/12 at 10:53 am to DaleDenton
quote:
Read the entire sentence.
2003, 2007, and 2010 were very lean years for CFB in the BCS era.
Try harder.
Posted on 1/30/12 at 10:54 am to SunHog
quote:
The SEC wasn't any better than the SWC and we've been over this many times.
Here is the SWC's glory years:
From 1960-1990, The SWC only had 1 team with an overall winning record against SEC teams during that 30 year period: Texas.
From 1960-1990, the SEC only had 1 team with an overall losing record against SWC teams during that 30 year period: Tulane, who quit the SEC, because they couldn't compete.
Arkansas was .700+ against SWC competition during this period, but was approx. .440 against SEC competition during this period. Coincidently, Arkansas is approx. .450 against SEC competition since joining the SEC in 1992.
The SEC Champion has won .600+ of the Sugar Bowls since the Sugar Bowl was established. The SWC Champion has won approx. .400 of the Cotton Bowls when their champion had a tie-in to that bowl.
There are only 2 current SEC teams with all-time losing bowl records and they just so happen to be the 2 newest members: Arkansas and S. Carolina. The traditional SEC members all have winning bowl records. This means that when traditional SEC teams ventured out of conference to play, they usually won, whereas when Arkansas ventured out of the SWC, they usually lost.
In all time winning percentages, Arkansas is #7 behind Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, LSU, Auburn, and Florida.
That's all-time and with an easier record to work with each year.
Arkansas isn't in the top-half in any meaningful category for SEC teams.
Win a freaking conference title, please, before you want to claim that Arkansas has arrived in the SEC.
You are talking to fans of programs that have all won multiple SEC conference championships and multiple national championships.
Posted on 1/30/12 at 1:17 pm to DaleDenton
[quote]Posted by Message
DaleDenton
Arkansas is Copying the Tennessee Business Model
LSU and Auburn have only won when the division, conference and FBS level of football have been down.
Wait you just said this was the hardest division in the hardest conference and LSU just won an SEC title? Now we only
won cause things are down? You look like a huge homer and tool.
Btw the problem everytime someone objectively looks at Arkansas from an all time historical standpoint their abysmal bowl record will rear its ugly head. % wise they are bottom 5 all-time (with more than like 10 bowl games played I believe). This past cotton bowl was only 4 bowl win in 30 years.
DaleDenton
Arkansas is Copying the Tennessee Business Model
LSU and Auburn have only won when the division, conference and FBS level of football have been down.
Wait you just said this was the hardest division in the hardest conference and LSU just won an SEC title? Now we only
won cause things are down? You look like a huge homer and tool.
Btw the problem everytime someone objectively looks at Arkansas from an all time historical standpoint their abysmal bowl record will rear its ugly head. % wise they are bottom 5 all-time (with more than like 10 bowl games played I believe). This past cotton bowl was only 4 bowl win in 30 years.
This post was edited on 1/30/12 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 1/30/12 at 1:29 pm to Tammany Tom
quote:
The SEC wasn't any better than the SWC and we've been over this many times.
Here is the SWC's glory years:
From 1960-1990, The SWC only had 1 team with an overall winning record against SEC teams during that 30 year period: Texas.
From 1960-1990, the SEC only had 1 team with an overall losing record against SWC teams during that 30 year period: Tulane, who quit the SEC, because they couldn't compete.
Arkansas was .700+ against SWC competition during this period, but was approx. .440 against SEC competition during this period. Coincidently, Arkansas is approx. .450 against SEC competition since joining the SEC in 1992.
The SEC Champion has won .600+ of the Sugar Bowls since the Sugar Bowl was established. The SWC Champion has won approx. .400 of the Cotton Bowls when their champion had a tie-in to that bowl.
There are only 2 current SEC teams with all-time losing bowl records and they just so happen to be the 2 newest members: Arkansas and S. Carolina. The traditional SEC members all have winning bowl records. This means that when traditional SEC teams ventured out of conference to play, they usually won, whereas when Arkansas ventured out of the SWC, they usually lost.
In all time winning percentages, Arkansas is #7 behind Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, LSU, Auburn, and Florida.
That's all-time and with an easier record to work with each year.
Arkansas isn't in the top-half in any meaningful category for SEC teams.
Win a freaking conference title, please, before you want to claim that Arkansas has arrived in the SEC.
You are talking to fans of programs that have all won multiple SEC conference championships and multiple national championships.
Thar goes the flagship!!!
Page 9 of 10
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News