Started By
Message
re: Arkansas > Texas A&M
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:06 pm to ShreveportHog94
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:06 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
Another stupid fricking post with an Arkansas doesn't belong undertone.
Why are you so insecure? I wasn't saying that at all. I was comparing Arkansas to Texas A&M and saying that Arkansas was better. However, I think it will be really important for Arky to win the first 2-3 matchups with both teams in the SEC to solidify that going forward.
But, as of right now, Arkansas is the better program.
Still, you gripe. Wow.
The rest of this thread worked perfectly. Even got Arky and A&M fans arguing about WWII. It doesn't get any better than that!
That is the one thing I like about Texas A&M joining the SEC. There is lots of history with A&M and Arkansas, LSU, and even Alabama. Missouri? Not so much. Have any of us ever even played Missouri?
1
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:09 pm to AlaTiger
quote:
Missouri? Not so much. Have any of us ever even played Missouri?
I know Arkansas has only played them 5 times total. IIRC, 3 of those were bowl games.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:11 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
ShreveportHog94
You might want to learn how to use the "reply buttons" as my post said nothing about the hogs in any way.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:37 pm to T Rey WI
Yeah well i just click on a reply to any post. Doesn't really matter to me as long as my message is posted. And I'm just saying that fans and media are going to believe what they want to believe. Who ever is hot will get the praise while whoever is garbage will get treated as such. Unless of course you are ND. Winning games is all that matters to me. Arkansas has been better than GA and Tenn recently, but would anyone write Arkansas in as the better SEC program? Not by a long shot unless this trend continues for another 20 or so years.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:44 pm to T Rey WI
Yeah well i just click on a reply to any post. Doesn't really matter to me as long as my message is posted. And I'm just saying that fans and media are going to believe what they want to believe. Who ever is hot will get the praise while whoever is garbage will get treated as such. Unless of course you are ND. Winning games is all that matters to me. Arkansas has been better than GA and Tenn recently, but would anyone write Arkansas in as the better SEC program? Not by a long shot unless this trend continues for another 20 or so years.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:44 pm to ShreveportHog94
Jst curious to see if Arky will ever be able to get a Texas kid who A&M wants.
Oh, and congrats on being one of five teams in which A&M was able to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory against.
Arky is not a threat or worry. They were able to soundly beat a crappy 09 team, squeek by a decent 10 team, and I've already mentioned the 11 edition.
Oh, and congrats on being one of five teams in which A&M was able to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory against.
Arky is not a threat or worry. They were able to soundly beat a crappy 09 team, squeek by a decent 10 team, and I've already mentioned the 11 edition.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:47 pm to AlaTiger
We've beat that arse for decades, doesn't really change much with conference affiliation.
They'll just be mediocre and everybody not named Ole Miss or UK will gangbang them for a decade or so.
They'll just be mediocre and everybody not named Ole Miss or UK will gangbang them for a decade or so.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:48 pm to DWag215
What about the other 40 wins? How do you explain away those? 
This post was edited on 12/21/11 at 2:50 pm
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:49 pm to Woopigsooie20
quote:
We've beat that arse for decades, doesn't really change much with conference affiliation. They'll just be mediocre and everybody not named Ole Miss or UK will gangbang them for a decade or so.
Just an awful post.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:50 pm to TheCheshireHog
Before or after A&M was an all male military school?
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:53 pm to DWag215
You can't really disagree with the part about us beating your arse for decades.
Personal opinion is opinion, our ownage of A&M is fact.
Personal opinion is opinion, our ownage of A&M is fact.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:53 pm to DWag215
quote:
Before or after A&M was an all male military school?
And that matters, why? You guys have girls on your team or something?
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:54 pm to NCrawler
Thanks for the laugh, kids.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:55 pm to DWag215
A&M was actually most successful against Arkansas when you were all-male.
We've owned you for decades.
Pick one.
We've owned you for decades.
Pick one.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:58 pm to NCrawler
Wait, you mean top athletes dont mind going to an all male school in which their service in the military is required?
Or was it that the school's population and thus availability of any athlete was decimated by WW2, Korea, and Nam?....you Arky boys are sharp.
Or was it that the school's population and thus availability of any athlete was decimated by WW2, Korea, and Nam?....you Arky boys are sharp.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 3:01 pm to DWag215
You can spout your "all-male military academy" bullshite all you want.
I'm 34 years old. In my lifetime, Arkansas has only lost to TAMU 5 times.
5 times.
I'm 34 years old. In my lifetime, Arkansas has only lost to TAMU 5 times.
5 times.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 3:01 pm to wmr
Decades? Hell, we hadn't played you in damn near two prior to 09.
Look, the facts are facts and you guys have the clear edge in the series. But let's not pretend Arky's potential and resources are comparable. If I sound arrogant, I'm sorry. It's just that Texas A&M shouldn't really ever lose in anything (athletically or otherwise) to an Arkansas.
Look, the facts are facts and you guys have the clear edge in the series. But let's not pretend Arky's potential and resources are comparable. If I sound arrogant, I'm sorry. It's just that Texas A&M shouldn't really ever lose in anything (athletically or otherwise) to an Arkansas.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 3:02 pm to wmr
quote:
You can spout your "all-male military academy" bullshite all you want. I'm 34 years old. In my lifetime, Arkansas has only lost to TAMU 5 times. 5 times.
Dumb Arkansas logic.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 3:02 pm to DWag215
quote:
Or was it that the school's population and thus availability of any athlete was decimated by WW2, Korea, and Nam?
So I guess you UT stepchildren were the only ones affected by said wars? Damn, good thing you sent all your males to Europe and Asia to win the war for us...
Posted on 12/21/11 at 3:02 pm to DWag215
quote:
If I sound arrogant, I'm sorry. It's just that Texas A&M shouldn't really ever lose in anything (athletically or otherwise) to an Arkansas.
But yet you continue to...
I bet it really pisses you off.
Page 3 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News