Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 14
Started By
Message
locked post

Are you pleased with the SEC Expansion adding Mizzou & A&M?

Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:31 am
Posted by TenTex
Member since Jan 2008
15949 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:31 am
We are halfway into the 2012 season and we are seeing more A&M and Mizzou football than we ever have. I think both schools were great additions and seem to be happy with being apart of the SEC.
So hear are my questions:

1) First to Mizzou and A&M Fans, what are your thoughts with being in the SEC so far? Are there any differences you notice from SEC fans compared to Big 12 fans?

2) How do the original SEC 12 schools feel about A&M and Mizzou and their fans? Do you have any personal stories to share from interacting with fans from either school?

3) Has traveling to the 2 new schools been a pleasurable experience? If so, how? Have there been any special greetings?

4) For Mizzou and A&M fans, how has travel been to SEC schools so far? Any special greetings?

5) Was adding both schools good for the SEC fan base? We know its good for increased revenues.

6) Should we add another 2 schools soon to get our expansion to 16?

Any other comments?

Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:32 am to
No. Really preferred FSU and Clemson.
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:32 am to
frick LSU
Posted by VolsFan24
Member since Jun 2011
2153 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:33 am to
Im okay with tx am... Mizz just does not seem like an sec team at all. No way, shape, or form.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
44849 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:33 am to
quote:

6) Should we addanother2 schools soon togetour expansion to 16?


16 will happen whether we like it or not. Personally, I'm sick and tired of the expansion and "super conference" bullshite but it is gonna happen within the next 5 years. I have absolutely no idea who it will be and any speculation on my part is an uneducated guess.

As far as on the field, A&M has a ton of potential. They are situated in the best state for high school recruiting, and they can sell Texas kids on playing in the SEC. Their fanbase gets picked on a lot, but they definitely love their team and their stadium is SEC material.

Missouri doesn't have the same built in advantages. Pinkel will need to tweak his offensive philosophy to make it not so dependent on the QB run, which is what made it successful in the Big 12 with Franklin and Brad Smith. Even when Chase Daniel and Blaine Gabbert running the show, they still had no inside running game. They need several years of recruiting and an overhaul of what they want to do on offense.
This post was edited on 10/23/12 at 8:37 am
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95916 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:34 am to
quote:

Really preferred FSU and Clemson.


Careful what you wish for. If you think A&M fans have been mouthy. Mizzou fans have quieted down but they were mouthy too before the season.

Clemson and FSU? Oh my god the Rant would get terminal cancer.
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:34 am to
quote:

Mizz just does not seem like an sec team at all. No way, shape, or form.


They're midwestern/northern and were a terrible addition.
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96013 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:35 am to
quote:

Are you pleased with the SEC Expansion adding Mizzou & A&M?


of course not.
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:36 am to
Nothing to do with fans, wished we could have added those two the last time.
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:37 am to
No you don't.
Posted by trillhog
Elite Membership
Member since Jul 2011
19407 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:37 am to
quote:

Im okay with tx am... Mizz just does not seem like an sec team at all. No way, shape, or form.


this is my feelings
Posted by Aggie Fishfinder
Republic of Texas
Member since Feb 2012
4260 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:38 am to
I can't speak for every Aggie, but I LOVE being in the SEC. We are getting more publicity every week and every game as been on TV. That is a HUGE improvement from what we are used to. Just a few years ago, we had conference games that were not picked up on TV. The exposure we are getting is great.

I have only been to the UF and LSU games, but I was very impressed with how well the fans traveled to College Station. MUCH better than many Big 12 schools. Waco is only 90 miles away from CS, and Baylor usually only brought 2-4 thousand fans to the games in College Station. Same with Texas Tech, OSU, etc. UF and LSU easily tripled that number.

We have lost two games this year, but I believe we are heading in the right direction and am very excited about what is ahead.
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:41 am to
I think the SEC schools minus Mizzou are full of inbred racist hicks with a collective IQ of 50.
Posted by McRebel42
North Mississippi Hollywood
Member since Oct 2012
11606 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:41 am to

$$$$$$

quote:

16 will happen whether we like it or not.


If it happens who do you expect to be the other two teams???
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:42 am to
A&M is a better school than Mizzouri, dicknose. Nice try.
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95916 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:42 am to
quote:

If it happens who do you expect to be the other two teams???


Virginia Tech and NC State are my best guesses.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119168 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:43 am to
quote:

Im okay with tx am... Mizz just does not seem like an sec team at all. No way, shape, or form.



It's not about the team, it's the TV market....
Posted by Aggie Fishfinder
Republic of Texas
Member since Feb 2012
4260 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:44 am to
quote:

If it happens who do you expect to be the other two teams???


I really don't know. I have heard that VT might be a good addition, but they are politically tied to UVA. We would have to take both. FSU would be good, but I don't think UF wants that and they might get the rest of the SEC to vote against it. Same probably goes with Clemson since USC would probably veto that.
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:44 am to
quote:

A&M is a better school than Mizzouri, dicknose. Nice try


You're funny. I like your style.
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 10/23/12 at 8:45 am to
Dammit, hold on...yes I do. I really like TexA&M but you guys are in great area loaded with good teams and should be in a conference there. I am not for the global conferences, no offense intended.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter